MessageListener interface strictly define behavior of listeners in
multithreaded environment
(http://java.sun.com/j2ee/1.4/docs/api/javax/jms/MessageListener.html). Session
should serialize dispatching of messages to listener, so you don't need any
additional synchronization primitives over Mes
Hello there! We are using 5.3.1 deployed as a HA failover cluster via an NFS
mount.
We are able to kill a broker (which we are calling the HOT broker) and get a
second broker (or COLD broker) to take over with only a few messages lost in
transition (353 out of 1.3 Million) which are chalking up t
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2692
Gary Tully wrote:
>
>
> Can you raise an enhancement for this?
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Derby-is-not-stopped-when-undeploying-app-from-WLS-tp28181591p28195558.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing lis
We've nfsv4 deployed, but I can double-check. I'm aware of v3 issues with
locks, and decided to migrate to v4. Anything on ActiveMQ side that I need
to configure specifically for production environment, though it works fine
with other environments?
thanks,
Vish.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Ga
That did it! Many thanks.
jmarks wrote:
>
> I tried running StompExample after starting ActiveMQ using the following
> command line from Windows:
>
> bin\activemq.bat xbean:conf/activemq-stomp.xml
>
> ActiveMQ then indicated that it had started the two stomp connectors. When
> I tried to run t
glad that helped.
There is a policyEntry expireMessagesPeriod for a destination, it defaults
to 3 milliseconds so you can reduce that which will ease the processing
of large queue depths or set it to 0 if you don't use a message time to
live.
On 9 April 2010 14:33, moacsjr wrote:
>
> Thanks
Thanks Gary!
I have tried 5.3.1 and my application doesn't die. But the "Memory usage"
message is still there.
I have discovery that in production I have a lot of messages in queues that
doesn't have any consumers. So the ActiveMQ Scheduler was working hard on
every message on this queues at very
I'm sorry if this question has been answered before, but it is not clear to
me yet what the safe way is to update class fields from the 'onMessage()'
method of an asynchronous consumer.
I am using ActiveMQ 5.3.0 with the default settings (Java 1.6). The
following example code shows that 'onMessag
On Fri, 2010-04-09 at 00:11 -0700, Radha Manickam wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Even i tried with the latest version 3.1.2.
>
> It also shows me the same error.
>
> It is creating only the .d, .i and .lo files. But .o files are not at all
> created.
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Radha.
You can review this issue
you need a nfs version that supports shared distributed locks, on your
production box. nfsv4 should do the trick.
On 9 April 2010 01:33, Vishist Mandapaka wrote:
> Hi,
> We've two brokers running on shared data-store mounted through NFS.
> Broker version is 5.3.0 and jdk is 1.6.0.
> Everything
Hello Dejan,
currently I try to configure ActiveMQ with Java Service Wrapper 3.4.0, which
is now able to install the service. So the ActiveMQ broker service it will
start when the computer boots:
http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/launch-nix.html
This new feature in release 3.4.0 als
Hi,
the problem was in changed StompConnection API, as now the connect() method
do all the checks. It's fixed on the trunk, and you can also fix it in your
distro by removing
StompFrame connect = connection.receive();
if (!connect.getAction().equals(Stomp.Responses.CONNECTED)) {
throw new Excepti
Hi,
Even i tried with the latest version 3.1.2.
It also shows me the same error.
It is creating only the .d, .i and .lo files. But .o files are not at all
created.
Thanks & Regards,
Radha.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Error-in-Compiling-Activemq-cpp-using-aCC-in-HP-
13 matches
Mail list logo
