Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

Unfortunately I am seeing it in 5.3. I just posted on this more current thread as well: http://old.nabble.com/50k-%2B-messages-stuck-in-queue-with-all-consumers-blocking-on-receive-td27162095.html Thanks, Elliot rajdavies wrote: > > This should be resolved in 5.3 > On 20 Feb 2010, at 07:12,

Re: 50k + messages stuck in queue with all consumers blocking on receive

Hey Maarten, I am observing the same behavior in my AMQ application. Was your problem resolved? I've tried a few different connection factory approach to no avail :( Thanks, Elliot Maarten_D wrote: > > Hi Rob, > Sorry, I'd killed that particular JVM before I read your request, and the > err

Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

This should be resolved in 5.3 On 20 Feb 2010, at 07:12, Elliot Barlas wrote: Was this issue ever resolved? I am seeing this as well with a large number of concurrent consumers. Same symptoms. Lost messages until broker restart. Thanks, Elliot chrajanirao wrote: We are seeing issues

Re: Stuck messages - Dispatch issues

Was this issue ever resolved? I am seeing this as well with a large number of concurrent consumers. Same symptoms. Lost messages until broker restart. Thanks, Elliot chrajanirao wrote: > > We are seeing issues with ActiveMQ 5.1 and 5.2 RC2 with message > dispatching from queues. It is easi

Re: Persistence not working

Wxman wrote: > > But, looking at my code, it creates durable subscriptions to topics in my > *consumer* code. There is no reference to durable messages in the > producer code. So, am I leaving something out? (I must be, because my > app doesn't seem to behave in the way you describe Durable

Re: Persistence not working

bsnyder wrote: > > Two points within JMS that are often confused are message durability > and message persistence. Though they are similar, there are some > semantic differences but each has its specific purpose. Message > durability can only be achieved with the pub/sub domain. When clients > c

Re: Persistence not working

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Wxman wrote: > > > bsnyder wrote: >> >> The default configuration in ActiveMQ 5.3 will persist messages using >> KahaDB: >> >> http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html >> >> This will persist messages between broker restarts. But this will only >> work if the message

Re: Persistence not working

bsnyder wrote: > > The default configuration in ActiveMQ 5.3 will persist messages using > KahaDB: > > http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html > > This will persist messages between broker restarts. But this will only > work if the messages are marked for persistence by the message > producer:

Bridging not working reliable

H! I'm trying to use a Bridge to Oracle JMS. I have a embeded Broker with a local persistant Queue and a bridge to Oracle. If all systems are fine, no problems. - BrokerService broker = new BrokerService(); JmsQueueConnector jmsQueueConnector = new JmsQueueConnector(); QueueConnec

Re: Persistence not working

On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Wxman wrote: > > I'm using AMQ 5.3.0...  My programs successfully send and receive messages > through the broker.  However, this only happens for messages sent after its > launch.  Messages that were submitted *prior* to my app's launch are *not* > received.  My un

Persistence not working

I'm using AMQ 5.3.0... My programs successfully send and receive messages through the broker. However, this only happens for messages sent after its launch. Messages that were submitted *prior* to my app's launch are *not* received. My understanding of persistence is that this is the point of

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

That was it. Thanks! I had to set to indexCacheSize = 10 to get the performance I'm looking for. rajdavies wrote: > > ok - it looks like you might need to tune KahaDB - set the > indexCacheSize = 1000 - see http://activemq.apache.org/kahadb.html > > > -- View this message in conte

Re: ActiveMQ looses messages under windows 2003

one though, to alleviate any potential problem in the application code, it may be worth trying the example producer and consumer from both boxes. On 19 February 2010 16:53, js.w wrote: > > Hi, > > In the last few days I've tried several configurations on

ActiveMQ looses messages under windows 2003

Hi, In the last few days I've tried several configurations on several servers and saw some rather unusual results which I can't really figure out. I have a simple scenario for the JMS Server. A process adds about 10k messages (about 1kb size each) to a queue. A second process reads all the messag

How to resubmit Dead Letters via ActiveMQ?

I've been working with the IBM WebSphere 7 and it's embedded JMS messaging engine (SIB). What I eventually discovered is that in order to easily resubmit a Dead Letter, I'd need to upgrade to their ESB product. This upgrade would give me access to the "Failed Event Manager" tool, which appears t

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP - why ResourceLifecycleManager is not synchronized?

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 08:29 -0800, Ivan Pechorin wrote: > Hi Tim, > > > Care to work up a patch for it and create an issue? > > Sure, I will do it soon. > > Best regards, IVan Great! Thanks for your help. Regards -- Tim Bish Open Source Integration: http://fusesource.com ActiveMQ in Actio

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP - why ResourceLifecycleManager is not synchronized?

Hi Tim, > Care to work up a patch for it and create an issue? Sure, I will do it soon. Best regards, IVan -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-CPP---why-ResourceLifecycleManager-is-not-synchronized--tp27653021p27656486.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing li

URGENT QUESTION: AMQ 5.3.0 bug or configuration error??? - ObjectMessage is [still] being serialized when using setObjectMessageSerializationDefered and setCopyMessageOnSend

I'm sorry for the extremely URGENT nature of this question, but I believe I've either come across a bug in AMQ 5.3.0 or I need additional configuration settings. I have multiple POJO(s) that are using an embedded ActiveMQ broker via "vm" access. They are sending custom objects around as the payl

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP - why ResourceLifecycleManager is not synchronized?

On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 06:39 -0800, Ivan Pechorin wrote: > Hi! > > We use ActiveMQ C++ 3.1.0 client in a multi-threaded application. We use > activemq::cmsutil::SessionPool and activemq::cmsutil::PooledSession. > > Today the application crashed because methods createCachedProducer and > createCac

ActiveMQ-CPP - why ResourceLifecycleManager is not synchronized?

Hi! We use ActiveMQ C++ 3.1.0 client in a multi-threaded application. We use activemq::cmsutil::SessionPool and activemq::cmsutil::PooledSession. Today the application crashed because methods createCachedProducer and createCachedConsumer do not synchronize access to their shared ResourceLifecyc

Re: Newbie question - CMS and decaf::lang::Thread

On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:58 -0800, Gautam Divgi wrote: > Hi, > > I've just started using ActiveMQ and CMS. I was wondering if there was some > requirement that the decaf::lang::Thread was the way to thread an > application using CMS. I would much rather prefer using the boost threads. > Just wonde