Hi Kevin,
thanks for digging into this and raising a Jira. We should fix this as we
plan to upgrade to Spring 3 for the next release.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - ht
It might be worth turning off producer flow control - see
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/producer-flow-control.html
On 9 Feb 2010, at 02:04, hwl wrote:
Found a thread in the forum on similar issue that links to
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/my-producer-blocks.html.
We tried, and do not
I am running the demo webapp in the download without any modification, and it
apparently is connecting to the standalone broker which I started using the
activemq.bat file.
I don't understand why this should be, since the web.xml has a
org.apache.activemq.brokerURL
vm://local
hi. i am trying to check out during runtime, the queue of waiting tasks of a
thread pool.
I am using org.springframework.scheduling.concurrent.ThreadPoolTaskExecutor
and calling this:
ThreadPoolTaskExecutor.getThreadPoolExecutor().getQueue().size()
But it returns the pool size (ThreadPoolTas
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 1:35 PM, boday wrote:
>
> I'm trying to determine my options for clustering my AMQ 5.3 application that
> uses ServiceMix 3.3.1 and Camel 2.1. I'm performing high volume message
> processing and I need to cluster for high availability and horizontal
> scalability.
>
> Here
I’m using ActiveMQ with mySQL persistence.
I’m getting the error ACTIVEMQ_MSGS table is full, even though there are
only very few records in the table (<300)…By default ActiveMQ will create
the tables with innoDB as the storage engine type.
Appreciate your inputs
--
View this message in c
Found a thread in the forum on similar issue that links to
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/my-producer-blocks.html.
We tried, and do not observe the blocking issue so far. However, the
performance dropped, with the average response time now at about 600ms. We
set the usageManager limit to 128MB
Anyone can help me?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Exceptions-are-not-thrown-on-XA-Enviroment-tp27437336p27505906.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Yes, I was using Spring 3.0. (I didn't notice until you mentioned it that
the ActiveMQ distribution is using Spring 2.5.6. I guess somewhere between
the two the parsing started paying attention to the schema. When I switched
over to the spring jars that came with the distribution, it worked fin
I'd be interested as well.
I'm not using TTL, so I assumed my orphaned/non-sequence log files were due to
out of order message consumption, but I also see the occasional log file hang
around longer than expected. (say db-50.log then next is db-400.log, so big gap)
-Original Message-
Fr
Hi,
are you using Spring 3.0 in your application? I've seen this when tried to
upgrade Spring to 3.0. Still didn't find time to dig into the root of the
problem, but basically it seems that ordering of elements is now necessary.
So just, move 'destinationPolicy' tag up and everything should be fin
I wrote a tiny bit of code intending to experiment with starting up an
ActiveMQ instance inside a web application (with the intention of eventually
using an "in the VM" configuration). I'm using ActiveMQ version 5.3.0, and
Java 1.6.0_17.
To start with, I simply tried to start an instance program
Any suggestions on how to prevent pileups of data/kahadb/db-xxx.log files?
I just had to clean up 301 data/kahadb/db-xxx.log files that accumulated on
a QA machine over 6 days. Message time to live is one day so that should not
be happening.
Logs show KahaDB cleanup was taking longer than expe
Hi all
I m using this spring + xbeans configuration to start the broker with my
webapp:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 06:56 -0800, pshar...@sapient.com wrote:
> Hi,
> We are in the process of using Apache NMS dll's for implementing
> Transactional handling. In version 1.2.0, there is support of
> RedeliveryPolicy class.
>
> But as mentioned on website 'http://activemq.apache.org' - The NMS 1
Hi,
We are in the process of using Apache NMS dll's for implementing
Transactional handling. In version 1.2.0, there is support of
RedeliveryPolicy class.
But as mentioned on website 'http://activemq.apache.org' - The NMS 1.2.0
Client Releases are still in progress.
Can anyone please confirm on
Lionel Cons writes:
> I'm aware of the existence of Net::Stomp but this module does not
> provide the functionality that we need and seems to be unsupported
> (no reply from the maintainer).
Heh, it is supported, kinda, you just have to be loud enough. Last
time I wanted to add something to Net:
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 03:38 -0800, opernas wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> Im trying to use activemq-cpp to connect to activemq broker, but I need ssl
> support. I know that there is one trunk with ssl support, but i think that
> is not fully stable yet, is it? For all people who needs to implement c++
>
For your information, I've uploaded today a new module to CPAN
allowing a Perl client to interact with a STOMP server. I tested it
against ActiveMQ and it seems to work fine.
See: http://search.cpan.org/~lcons/Net-STOMP.
This module provides an object oriented client interface to interact
with se
You may need to tune the maxBrowsePage size destination policy option. This
is a limit on the amount of messages that the broker will bring into memory
for a jms browser. Typically the broker will page in 200 messages at a time
and 2*200 for a browser. The intention is to limit the impact of browsi
Hi all,
Im trying to use activemq-cpp to connect to activemq broker, but I need ssl
support. I know that there is one trunk with ssl support, but i think that
is not fully stable yet, is it? For all people who needs to implement c++
client for jms, there are some workaround to do this? another l
You can configure the destination prefetch on the broker configuration via a
DestinationPolicy rather than on the destination in JNDI. Or on the
connection factory. See:
http://activemq.apache.org/what-is-the-prefetch-limit-for.html
Prefetch 0 is useful for a polling consumer, a message is dispatc
Hi Gary,
Thanks for the workaround but this only works with synchronous consumers -
when I use the same topic (obtained from JNDI in reality - unlike the code I
shared) with an async consumer I get:
javax.jms.JMSException: Illegal prefetch size of zero. This setting is not
supported for asynch
23 matches
Mail list logo
