I'm trying to determine my options for clustering my AMQ 5.3 application that
uses ServiceMix 3.3.1 and Camel 2.1. I'm performing high volume message
processing and I need to cluster for high availability and horizontal
scalability.
Here is basically what my application does (using Apache
Camel)
Ah. Thanks for the link. That'll save me a bunch of time. I'll rewrite my
code I guess. :)
thanks
sam
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> yea. I think you are seeing:
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2324
> I know some work started on it but give it your vote to give it a priority
> bump.
>
You might want to have a look at
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2384
there is a patch attached that make a first pass at enabling this via
properties but it needs more work.
Vote for that issue in any event to increase the priority order of it or
make it work if you can :-)
thanks.
yea. I think you are seeing:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2324
I know some work started on it but give it your vote to give it a priority
bump.
On 5 February 2010 15:18, samp wrote:
>
> I forgot to mention that this configuration file is exactly the same on
> both
> brokers. I *
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2 (FuseESB 4).
I have durable queue whitch contains about 3000 messages (via jconsole). But
when I try to browse queue using activemq web console I can see only 600
messages.
My broker's configuration is:
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="default"
d
I forgot to mention that this configuration file is exactly the same on both
brokers. I *think* that means I don't need it to be duplex, is that correct?
In any case, my problem still happens regardless of the duplex setting.
thanks
sam
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/res
Hello all,
I am a novice ActiveMQ user, and I hope that ActiveMQ community will can
helps/advices me.
In fact I would like to know if ActiveMQ is appropriate for large files
transfer, and if there are some limitations ?
1. What is the most appropriate protocol for large file transfer?
I would l
I've also tried a few other things I'll mention. I saw this error:
[2010-02-05 07:14:40 -0500] [DEBUG]
org.apache.activemq.network.DemandForwardingBridge - Broker Ignoring sub
ConsumerInfo {...} already subscribed to matching destination
So I added "conduitSubscriptions="false"". The error chang
Thanks for the pointer. I definitely wasn't setting duplex and it sounds like
I need it. This is my new config (duplex just added). I've bounced both
brokers but it appears I'm still seeing the same problem.
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.apache.org/sc
Hi, we are testing Pure Master/Slave component with following configuration :
- brokers are located on Vmware ESX in separate VM.
Linux 5.4.
Active-MQ 5.3.0
master :
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="localhost" waitForSlave="true" shutdownOnSlaveFailure="true"
persist
Hi all,
We are using ActiveMQ 5.2.0 over the WAN. We have a remote application that
has 2 consumers listening for messages. These 2 consumers use message
selectors in order to receive different types of messages and process these
messages accordingly. At first we were using Broker-To-Broker commu
I don't know. But the persistence mechanisms will not be writing text, it
will be binary data which should avoid encoding, no?
Have a go and report back with the next problem and we will take if from
there.
On 5 February 2010 08:51, Fred Moore wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> thanks for your answer.
>
> >
can you post the configuration of the brokers? sounds like you need a duplex
networkconnector or a networkconnector (as they are one way by default)
configured on each broker.
see:
http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html#NetworksofBrokers-NetworkConnectorProperties
On 5 February 2010
Hi Gary,
thanks for your answer.
> I guess you could run without xml configuration
> and set any non default values via code
yes right, we thought about that, it forces us to hardcode stuff we wouldn't
have hardocoded but it could be done, but...
...do you expect that the only issues about hav
Hi,
we don't have that implemented at the moment. You can raise a Jira for it
and ideally provide a patch. It shouldn't be hard to implement. Take a look
at
MessageListenerServlet.doMessages()
http://fisheye6.atlassian.com/browse/activemq/trunk/activemq-web/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/web/
15 matches
Mail list logo