Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

I can confirm that has resolved the issue I was seeing. Thanks Rob! What's ETA for 5.4 or applying this fix in 5.3? I'll need an official stable release to put into production. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/OOM-with-high-KahaDB-index-time-tp27217704p27413891.html Sent

Re: setting timetolive on ActiveMQ queue

ok. please include your use case, as in why you want this functionality. Some variant of the timestamp plugin may already suffice. On 2 February 2010 00:02, ssurabhi wrote: > > Gary, > > Unfortunately this is not what i was looking for. We are already using > Spring JMSTemplate to set a global t

Re: setting timetolive on ActiveMQ queue

Gary, Unfortunately this is not what i was looking for. We are already using Spring JMSTemplate to set a global timetolive on the messages which serves the same purpose as timestampplugin. >From your answer it is clear that we currently dont have per destination feature. I will ty to open issu

Re: setting timetolive on ActiveMQ queue

The time stamp broker plugin can do this for you for all messages that do not set a timetolive, see: http://activemq.apache.org/timestampplugin.html Seems like a nice per destination feature though, if the timestamp plugin does not meet your requirement, please open a jira issue to track this enha

setting timetolive on ActiveMQ queue

Hello, i am trying to figure if there is any way to set timetolive on "Destination" basis. I know we can set at MessageProducer level. I am trying to find out an equivalent function as weblogic jms. Weblogic JMS supports "delivery-override-params" attribute at queue level where we can set the tim

Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time

Good to know! - this was a silly error - When a consumer got so far behind a producer so that the cache was invalidated, after every acknowledgement of a message, a cursor would check to see if the index was empty. To do that it would ask for a count of still outstanding persistent messages

RE: OOM with high KahaDB index time

Ran this through some paces, and it works much better. Thanks for the help! -Original Message- From: Gary Tully [mailto:gary.tu...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 2:35 AM To: users@activemq.apache.org Subject: Re: OOM with high KahaDB index time Hi Daniel, builds from today

Re: Testing around BlobMessage

yea, that is correct. On 1 February 2010 15:16, johncarl81 wrote: > > Another related question... > > Am I required to have a ftp (or similar... scp?) server running side by > side > with activemq to utilize the BlobMessage functionality? Seems like I would > have to from the way the unit tests

Re: How to set alwaysSyncSend=true on a VM connector via URI? ("vm://MyBrk?alwaysSyncSend=true" does not work)

Hi, try jms.alwaysSyncSend, it should work Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Fred Moore wrote: > Hi Folks, >

Re: Testing around BlobMessage

Another related question... Am I required to have a ftp (or similar... scp?) server running side by side with activemq to utilize the BlobMessage functionality? Seems like I would have to from the way the unit tests work. Thanks again. John Gary Tully wrote: > > have a look at org.apache.a

How to set alwaysSyncSend=true on a VM connector via URI? ("vm://MyBrk?alwaysSyncSend=true" does not work)

Hi Folks, we are trying to create a 5.3 connection factory with this URI "vm://MyBrk?alwaysSyncSend=true" expecting to see alwaysSyncSend=true in the resulting ActiveMQConnectionFactory object... but this does not happen. What are we missing? FWIW: 1\ Setting alwaysSyncSend=true via Java code i

Re: Release date fpr 5.3.1 or 5.4 ( as Re: Problem with 'dispatched queue')

Watch the list of outstanding issues for 5.3.1 https://issues.apache.org/activemq/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10520&fixfor=12183 When these are resolved we can do a release. On 1 February 2010 13:57, Christoph Kutzinski

Re: GetConsumers

I don't know, hot can I programm it. Have anybody an idea? lernit2007 wrote: > > Hello, > > I want see which consumer or consumers have a queue. Have anybody a code > example for me? Thanks im behaviour. > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/GetConsumers-tp27335605p274054

Release date fpr 5.3.1 or 5.4 ( as Re: Problem with 'dispatched queue')

Which raises my next question: When can we expect a release of ActiveMQ 5.3.1 or 5.4? Christoph Kutzinski wrote: > > I've got the hint that this is related to > https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2567 > > I've now tried a current Snapshot of ActiveMQ 5.4 which contains the fix > fo

Re: Block Queue

The second publisher can send at the same time - there will be synchronization points in the broker around writing the message to disk - but apart from that the publish() will be interlaced. Have a look at http://fusesource.com/wiki/display/ProdInfo/Understanding+the+Threads+Allocated+in+Active

Re: Problem with 'dispatched queue'

I've got the hint that this is related to https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2567 I've now tried a current Snapshot of ActiveMQ 5.4 which contains the fix for it and it works as expected! Many thanks to Rudolf Janz for pointing me in that direction and to Gary Tully for helping me ge

Block Queue

Hello, if a producer send messages to a queue, it is then possible that second producer can send messages at the same time in the same queue or is the queue blocked until the first producer end with the send messages to queue? Thanks im behaviour -- View this message in context: http://old.na

Error : connector http

Hello, I received this error in ActiveMQ, is that someone has already encountered the same problem ? logger : org.mortbay.log btpool0-0 - Acceptor0 selectchannelconnec...@0.0.0.0:8161 java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: unable to create new native thread at java.lang.Thread.start0(Native Method)