Hello.
I have issue where I can't assure time synchronization between the broker
and the clients.
I'm using request response and all of my messages are lost if the client
time is ahead of the broker time.
What would be the right way of soving this problem if I still want to use
request-response.
I was finally able to write unit test to replicate the problem without
using Camel.
Here is the issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2565
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:53 -0800, Dragisa Krsmanovic wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:48 -0800, Dragisa Krsmanovic wrote:
> > while ((exchang
On 01/12/2010 02:06 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
> Hi Marshall,
> can you add your configuration to that jira. I wonder/could a jdbc pool
> timeout or periodic check help to ensure that expired connections are reaped
> by the pool before being returned to the jdbc persistence adapter?
>
> Do you find tha
Hi,
I have a problem where TemporaryQueues are left (with 0 consumers) after the
applications creating them have finished.
This scenario occurs for both ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and 5.3.0 on my P4 2.6 GHz, 3
GB RAM, Ubuntu 9.10, Sun JDK, default settings for ActiveMQ.
I've tried to recreate a simpler ver
apr-1.3.9
apr-iconv-1.2.1
apr-util-1.3.9
first one comes here:
-
debug.exe!decaf::lang::exceptions::NoSuchElementException::NoSuchElementException(const
char * file=0x01486e78, const int lineNumber=239, const char *
msg=0x01486f28, ...) Line 110 C++
debug.exe!decaf::util::StlMap,st
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 06:51 -0800, Sodan wrote:
> its simple, all I do is:
>
> activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary();
> itsConnectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(brokerURI);
> itsConnection = itsConnectionFactory->createConnection();
>
> and at that point 'createConnectio
its simple, all I do is:
activemq::library::ActiveMQCPP::initializeLibrary();
itsConnectionFactory = new ActiveMQConnectionFactory(brokerURI);
itsConnection = itsConnectionFactory->createConnection();
and at that point 'createConnection', the first NoSuchElementException
appears...
(it comes fro
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 02:59 -0800, Sodan wrote:
> Hi all
>
> (using cms 3.1, vs 2008)
>
> If we do broker url:
> tcp://host:61616
> then everything is fine, but we need failover (for automatic reconnect) so
> we do:
> failover:(tcp://host:61616)
>
> but then we get a lot of:
> First-chance excep
Hello,
I want to execute a message and a DB operation in a single transaction.
I know it is only possible using JTA. I am not using spring.
I am using Tom Cat server as an App Server.
Can any one give an idea of how to achieve this?
Had any one implemented similar kind of thing?
Thank You,
Mano
Hi,
Thanks for your replay.
Netstat returns following (for 61616 port):
C:\>netstat -an | find "61616"
TCP127.0.0.1:1975 127.0.0.1:61616ESTABLISHED
TCP127.0.0.1:1979 127.0.0.1:61616ESTABLISHED
TCP127.0.0.1:1980 127.0.0.1:61616ESTA
Hi Marcin,
the thread is allocated from a pool - it should get collected after a
minute (I think) - you not seeing that ?
On 12 Jan 2010, at 11:59, marcin80 wrote:
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2 and I've noticed thad ActiveMQ create new
thread for
every connection but even the client will d
With a normal disconnect from a java client those reader threads should
disappear. With an abnormal disconnect, where the socket is not fully
closed, it can take some time (os tcp config dependent) for the broker to
identify the connection as closed.
What does netstat tell you about the active con
Hi,
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2 and I've noticed thad ActiveMQ create new thread for
every connection but even the client will disconnect its thread still alive
(state RUNNABLE). It is ActiveMQ normal behavior?
Can I change this? I would like to finalize thread if client will
dissconnect.
Cheers,
Mar
Hi all
(using cms 3.1, vs 2008)
If we do broker url:
tcp://host:61616
then everything is fine, but we need failover (for automatic reconnect) so
we do:
failover:(tcp://host:61616)
but then we get a lot of:
First-chance exception at 0x7505e124 in server_debug.exe: Microsoft C++
exception: decaf:
Hi Marshall,
can you add your configuration to that jira. I wonder/could a jdbc pool
timeout or periodic check help to ensure that expired connections are reaped
by the pool before being returned to the jdbc persistence adapter?
Do you find that the symptom is unrecoverable, that is, you see the s
Hi Marteen,
I think
http://activemq.apache.org/persistence.html
is the right place for it. We just need more material there.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://ww
Thank you. I am looking forward to that :)
Franz
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Yes we should do an article on that - I would recommend you look at
> Apache Directory Server for what you want: http://directory.apache.org/
> On 12 Jan 2010, at 02:23, FranzWong wrote:
>
>>
>> I have read the page http
17 matches
Mail list logo