Hi,
As the return message is map message, you need to set "transformation"
header when you subscribe to the topic. Take a look at
http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html#Stomp-Messagetransformations for
more info.
I'll try to put an example of using this plugin from stomp soon.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bos
Hi,
Thank you for your reply!
Yes, I've added the latest version of spring-jms jar in the classpath. even
after that I get lot of incompatibility issues. eg: XML parsing issues like
'destinationPolicy', 'jetty', not found in activemq.xml and the activeMQ is
not getting started at all.
but, If i
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Mark Greene wrote:
> What is the current (AMQ 5.3) recommended implementation for producer
> connection factories? The wiki page for Spring Support suggests
> the org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory which appears to have
> been removed from the API.
Hi Joe
I have tried lots of configs but this one below is the most simple for
example.
Sending either object messages or map messages.
Any ideas what the pagedin is referring to? Is there a cursor that
guarantees no disk paging and just memory?
Running the fuse version.
Thanks for any help!
Cool
BTW - The framework also comes with a SNMP v2 Agent and MIB for AMQ through
which you can query the broker. It essentially exposes the MBeans via SNMP.
Anyway, thought I'd mention that just in case it makes it easier for cacti.
Joe
ripienaar wrote:
>
>
> Joe Fernandez wrote:
>>
>> You
Hey everyone,
It's official ... ActiveMQ-CPP v3.1.0 has now been released. This release has
several bug fixes for issues found since the 3.0.1 release also there are some
new features that have been much requested.
Here's a list of some of the highlights of this release.
* Added an Inact
Hi,
Can you post your broker's cfg file?
Also, what is the average size of the non-persistent messages that you're
pushing through the broker?
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
Adrian A wrote:
>
> Hello All
>
> On 5.3.0.4 and 5.3.0.5
>
> Seeing some odd behaviour with a messageproducer.send
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> You may find this free AMQ monitoring framework interesting or applicable
> to your env.
>
> http://www.ttmsolutions.com/Transactional_Software_Solutions/Active_Monitor_AMon.php
>
That's quite interesting but not really what I am after, I don't code java
for one and
You may find this free AMQ monitoring framework interesting or applicable to
your env.
http://www.ttmsolutions.com/Transactional_Software_Solutions/Active_Monitor_AMon.php
It allows you to develop and embed Camel-based monitoring agents within the
Broker. The agents use a monitoring expression
hello,
I'm keen to access the statisticsBrokerPlugin from stomp, I think the
languages stomp supports is more appropriate for monitoring than java based
ones - lots of start/stop of monitoring scripts etc - so quite keen to get
this going.
I understand I need to send an empty message to ActiveMQ
Hi
I want to upgrade from 5.2 to 5.3. I don't want to have to stop all my
brokers simultaneously but would rather stop and restart them one after the
other.
Is it possible to simultaneously have 5.2 and 5.3 brokers that exchange
messages together ?
Generally speaking, does ActiveMQ programmers
11 matches
Mail list logo
