Hello All,
I am having difficulty getting REST & https working in conjunction with each
other, could any one post a complete example of a activemq.xml config file
that should provide this behavior?
I have tried adding the following to my configuration:
https://localhost:8443"/>
How
Does this mean that the configuration that you are placing between the Call
tags cannot go into the ativemq.xml file?
Thank you.
RJtokenlanring wrote:
>
> Hi all, I've followed all the threads and configurations guide for
> configuring HTTPS support
> (activeMQ 5.3.0 + JBOSS)
>
> I have activa
I figured this out but it was in no way obvious...
I had to add this to the DMLC:
Hope this helps someone else avoid wasting a whole day..
Charles
chudak wrote:
>
> I'm having a problem with message redelivery.
>
> I'm using:
>
> ActiveMQ 5.3.0
> Spring 2.5.6
> Spring Integration 1.0
> A
I'm having a problem with message redelivery.
I'm using:
ActiveMQ 5.3.0
Spring 2.5.6
Spring Integration 1.0
Atomikos 3.5.9
If I send a 'broken' message to my queue, the transaction rolls back
correctly but it NEVER gets redelivered even if I restart both the client
(application) and the broker.
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:48 -0800, Dragisa Krsmanovic wrote:
> while ((exchange = consumerTemplate.receive(endpoint, 2000l)) !=
> null) {
>
> result.append(exchange.getIn().getBody(String.class)).append('/');
> }
To add more detail. This loop seems to read only one message at a time.
Even
I already asked this question on Camel mailing list.
This seems to be a problem introduced in ActiveMQ 5.3.0. Reproducible
both with Camel 2.0.0 and 2.1.0.
Here is the unit test:
==
@ContextConfiguration
public class PollingConsumerTest extends
AbstractTestNGSpr
Hello,
using kahaDB, could you have the same performance?
Because I encounter the same problem, even using what in
ActiveMQ-througthput.xml
best regards,
titexe
Duro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i've tested kahadb and kahaPersistenceAdapter using same simple test
> conditions i.e.
>
> - persistent
Looks like enableJournalDiskSyncs is comparable to the AMQ message store's
syncOnWrite (sync every write to disk) property, which by default it set to
'false'.
http://activemq.apache.org/amq-message-store.html
Joe
Duro wrote:
>
> It seems enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" do the trick, but what
It seems enableJournalDiskSyncs="false" do the trick, but what does this
setting actually do? Is it something i should worry about when disabling
this feature?
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
> Hi Duro,
>
> kahadb has some trade-offs for scalability and recovery speed vs.
> performance, but shouldn't t
You should get some improvement on the producer side if you set useAsyncSend
to true.
If you have a relatively small number of destinations and high throughput is
important, the AMQ message store is the way to go.
Joe
http://www.ttmsolutions.com
Duro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i've tested kahadb a
The lock manager wasn't running on one of the Solaris boxes.
MrBen wrote:
>
> I've got two solaris servers, and want a broker running on each with a
> corresponding slave on the opposite server. I'm using AMQ Persistence I've
> got a NAS that is mounted on both and have used the same filesyste
Hi Duro,
kahadb has some trade-offs for scalability and recovery speed vs.
performance, but shouldn't that much slower. You can check
activemq-throughout.xml config and see if applying some the parameters
seen there can help you.
If performance is your main issue (not scalability and recovery) th
12 matches
Mail list logo
