Hi Aaron,
we've spent a lot time addressing file handles/startup time - ActiveMQ
scales well in 5.3
cheers,
Rob
On 20 Nov 2009, at 11:40, Aaron Mulder wrote:
It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
(destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
t
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 16:50 -0800, Ted C. wrote:
> Please disregard this. We are see deadlocks in our application but the repro
> code included in the original message is incorrect.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ted C.
>
> Ted C. wrote:
If you do find a problem please feel free to open a new Jira issue and
Please disregard this. We are see deadlocks in our application but the repro
code included in the original message is incorrect.
Thanks,
Ted C.
Ted C. wrote:
>
> All --
>
> I'm hoping for some help. The following code reproduces a deadlock with
> both NMS 1.1.0 and trunk (Revision 882781).
All --
I'm hoping for some help. The following code reproduces a deadlock with
both NMS 1.1.0 and trunk (Revision 882781). The example behaves better
under the trunk but still locks up after about 3 minutes.
I've tried this with ActiveMQ 5.2 and 5.3 with essentially the stock configs
(discover
Hello,
I am setting up a configuration of activemq with a network of brokers (4
brokers instances) and I am facing several problems. I am using 5.2.0
release, java 1.6.0_07
1) Sometimes, the whole set of brokers would not respond anymore for message
producing. (blocking sendings). After restartin
On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 01:19 -0800, Saurbaum wrote:
>
>
> Timothy Bish wrote:
> >
> >
> > It would be helpful to know what version of the client you are using
> > along with some more info about your clients such as the acknowledgement
> > mode you are using, whether or not you are setting expir
w.r.t to partitioning, I imagine a scheme where destinations 1-X exist on
broker cluster A and X-N on broker cluster B. The client needs to randomly
choose a destination or use some lookup/location mechanism.
But as per Aaron's advice, do consider selectors as a way to reduce the
destination count.
Thanks for reply.
We had a lot of logging categories. I stripped then all out and left the
root category on DEBUG and then I see the logging as expected.
Thanks
Andrew
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> can you use -Dlog4j.debug (set the system property) to validate that log4j
> is getting the configurat
It was my experience that ActiveMQ does not handle that well
(destinations are not particularly "lightweight") and you'd do better
to have a smaller number of destinations with selectors. RAM is not
the main/only issue -- file handles and startup time also caused
problems.
Thanks,
Aaron
On W
Thank you, this is the kind of insight I was looking for.
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> It may be best to partition your destinations across a cluster.
>
How do you mean it?
What I have in mind is a network of brokers, X producers generate messages
on one end of the network, Y consumers process them
Hi,
new configurable IOException handling has been implemented
http://activemq.apache.org/configurable-ioexception-handling.html
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac - http://twitter.com/dejanb
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http:/
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
>
> It would be helpful to know what version of the client you are using
> along with some more info about your clients such as the acknowledgement
> mode you are using, whether or not you are setting expiration times on
> messages etc. There's just not enough informatio
I recall an issue with duplicates under certain circumstances with 5.2. What
version are you using?
Please verify with 5.3.0 or the latest SNAPSHOT
2009/11/20 O.
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I've made some tests and I saw something weird :
> - One producer sends 100 000 messages (with an ID) in a queu
Hi everybody,
I've made some tests and I saw something weird :
- One producer sends 100 000 messages (with an ID) in a queue
- Then one (and only one) consumer reads this 100 000 messages
The problem is that a package of 30 messages have been read twice by the
consumer.
I've done this 5 times
Hi Tim,
I am still not able to grasp the concept of ActiveMQ and how its
destinations are made available with JNDI.
I am following the tutorial at this link
http://activemq.apache.org/integrating-apache-activemq-with-jboss.html
Integrating Apache ActiveMQ with JBoss . I was able to successfully
thanks for the replies. on this project it turns out I didn't have to do
this in the end, but it's a really interesting area, and something I'll
certainly use in the future. we're very keen on the whole fire-and-forget
paradigm that JMS offers. I had a look around Joe's idea of interacting
with
16 matches
Mail list logo
