Thanks a lot for your reply!
I've found the wireFormat.MaxInactivityDuration option somewhen last night
and that's the solution for my problem. I wonder if nobody else had that
problem, because I didn't find anything and the option is kinda hidden (I'm
new to jms)
Now I'm using the failover, too
Re AMQ-1648; it would be ideal to avoid as much as possible having to
evict/lose messages, because a queue or some other system resource has
reached its max capacity. Instead, you'd like to proactively monitor system
resources and invoke or trigger some action (e.g., whenever a resource
reaches a
I'm not using 5.3, still working in 5.2 land. However I had run across that
issue and implemented the work-around provided in that post. I'll upgrade
to 5.3 here in the next 5 weeks and see if that solves the issue. Thanks
Gary.
-Brett
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> Are you using 5.3?
> see: https:/
http://old.nabble.com/Admin-Console:-Sort-on-Queue-name-td25440691.html#a25440691
Bryan Murphy-4 wrote:
>
> Is there a way I can have the administration interface automatically sort
> the queues by name when I go to the queues page without having to click on
> the name column?
> Thanks,
> Bryan
>What sort of instability are you seeing? If there were some specific
>areas than people could comment on how they've addressed them.
Producer can send the message, but consumer nothing get.
There is two ActiveMQ servers and C# clients with failover on.
>what hardware are you using? or virtu
Joe Fernandez wrote:
>
> Sounds like you're wanting to implement a message-level audit trail? With
> Camel, you could very quickly implement a wiretap message pattern
> (http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap.html) and have the wiretap route the
> tapped messages to a log4j appender. The appender's l
Thanks, Gary.
-M@
On Nov 3, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Gary Tully wrote:
committed that repo ref to trunk and the activemq-5.3 branch. both
build happily now. just svn up
2009/11/3 Gary Tully :
That artifact is not available from central but you can find it at
the
fusesource.com m2 repo
Am not sur
fuse activemq 5.3.0-4 + STOMP PHP client from
http://code.google.com/p/stompcli/downloads/list
If I set expires: header to expiry timestamp in milliseconds and send
a message to a queue it all works as expected, if noone is subscribed
it disappears after the time is up.
However, If I send the s
committed that repo ref to trunk and the activemq-5.3 branch. both
build happily now. just svn up
2009/11/3 Gary Tully :
> That artifact is not available from central but you can find it at the
> fusesource.com m2 repo
>
> Am not sure whether this should be an optional or required dependency.
>
>
How does setDispatchAsync exactly work?
Asynchronous dispatch means it opens a tcp connection to consumer every time
message arrives?
Please advice.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-asynchronous-dispatch-tp26160197p26160197.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailin
Hi,
you can use http(s) protocol with ActiveMQ scenario you described
http://activemq.apache.org/http-and-https-transports-reference.html
Basically, it starts a web contained with a servlet on a server side and
uses http-client on the client side. All messages are passed as xml payloads
over htt
JMS is an API not a transport protocol. Each JMS provider has its own
transport or wire-level protocol. For example, one of AMQ's transport
protocols is called OpenWire
(http://activemq.apache.org/openwire-version-2-specification.html) which can
be tunneled over or through HTTP/S
(http://activemq.
Sounds like you're wanting to implement a message-level audit trail? With
Camel, you could very quickly implement a wiretap message pattern
(http://camel.apache.org/wire-tap.html) and have the wiretap route the
tapped messages to a log4j appender. The appender's logfile could rollover
based on si
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 01:08 -0800, KimSchneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Active NMS .NET to produce messages and a java consumer.
>
> I can send messages from the producer to the message queue and the consumer
> is able to use them. But after a couple of seconds without sending a
> message, I g
Hello,
I have a newbie question. First some background:
We have an application that sits in an environment where only outgoing HTTP
connections are allowed. This application needs to do two things: (1) send
data to a remote server over the internet (2) receive commands from the same
remote serve
Hello,
I have a newbie question. First some background:
We have an application that sits in an environment where only outgoing HTTP
connections are allowed. This application needs to do two things: (1) send
data to a remote server over the internet (2) receive commands from the same
remote serve
Hi,
I'm using Active NMS .NET to produce messages and a java consumer.
I can send messages from the producer to the message queue and the consumer
is able to use them. But after a couple of seconds without sending a
message, I get the following error
[code]
Apache.NMS.ActiveMQ.BrokerException:
Matthew Hixson wrote:
> I see these messages: "Slow KahaDB access: cleanup took 1998"
I've also seen those messages. It is nice to get a hint about
possible performance issues. Now it be even better if someone could
offer a ballpark figure when to worry, and what to do about it.
--
Fredrik Jon
18 matches
Mail list logo