magellings wrote:
>
> Could anyone tell me what edition of the 32-bit wrapper we get when we
> download activemq? Hopefully the 32-bit version is community...
>
>From http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.org/doc/english/download.jsp:
"64-bit Windows versions of the Java Service Wrapper are not curr
Does anybody know if JMX naming differs for JMS resource b/w 5.20 and
5.3-SNAPSHOT? When I tried Hermes Discovery with 5.3-SNAPSHOT it
didn't discover any destinations where 5.20 finds all destinations.
There's a new plugin in trunk for the broker that you can send a
message to to ask statistics on a Destination (Topic or Queue) - and
it will send back a MapMessage with the stats in. If you can't wait a
while for the 5.3 release - which should be soon - it you can use that.
This will wo
Yes I'm using failover. The problem is that if I don't set the
maxReconnectAttempts, it waits forever when I call send and the connection
is down. But if I set the maxReconnectAttempts, then after it reaches that
max number of attempts, it never connnects again. Shouldn't I be able to
attempt a
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:20 PM, dbczak wrote:
>
> OK, I was able to stop it from waiting forever by setting the
> maxReconnectAttempts setting. However, it still does not behave as
> expected.
>
> Once everything is up and running, I shut down one of the consumers. In the
> producer I get thi
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:03 PM, dbczak wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have two consumers running, and one producer (all written in java). The
> producer is sending a message to each consumer with the basic failover
> transport. In the producer, I have the persistent setting set to true.
I'm not sure wh
OK, I was able to stop it from waiting forever by setting the
maxReconnectAttempts setting. However, it still does not behave as
expected.
Once everything is up and running, I shut down one of the consumers. In the
producer I get this error:
DEBUG - Transport failed with the following exceptio
Hi,
I have two consumers running, and one producer (all written in java). The
producer is sending a message to each consumer with the basic failover
transport. In the producer, I have the persistent setting set to true.
My problem is that if one of the consumer crashes, when the producer goe
Zip file uploaded...
http://www.nabble.com/file/p25458793/ConsoleApplication1.zip
ConsoleApplication1.zip
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Getting-negative-number-of-pending-messages-tp22106707p25458793.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.c
I'm attaching a sample app, configurations, and logs in a zip file. This
uses the official 1.1 NMS provider. Ran a test against a 5.2 broker...first
starting producer sending 100 messages. Shortly after started consumer
while those messages were still getting produced. Everything went through
I found a workaround solution.
1) open standardista-table-sorting.js which is located in the
$ActiveMQHOME$/webapps/admin/js/ folder.
2) change the function...
function standardistaTableSortingInit() {
standardistaTableSorting.init();
}
to the following...
This is for anyone interested in this issue..
I found a workaround solution.
1) open standardista-table-sorting.js which is located in the
$ActiveMQHOME$/webapps/admin/js/ folder.
2) change the function...
function standardistaTableSortingInit() {
standardistaTableSorting.in
I'll see what I can do my code uses a lot of abstract behaviour but
I'll see I can find other similar test cases and adapt.
At work we have Websphere MQ so today I'll be able to compare behaviors.
On Sep 15, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
Can we have a test case please ? :)
On 15 Sep 20
I'm very new to ActiveMQ, and this is probably a problem with the way I'm
using it. I do not know how to create a JIRA. It would be hard to create a
test case without the extra processing code included. The test would be as
follows:
1) Run TIPServer.java in 2 locations.
2) Create a new instance
Can we have a test case please ? :)
On 15 Sep 2009, at 14:41, Robert Nicholson wrote:
I just tried my app with the 5.3 SNAPSHOT and when I run it I see my
process is consuming messages but every single one of them is always
left on the queue. This even when my JMS Session is AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE
All,
I switched from using my sender page to using the console Send To capability.
What I have discovered is that in all cases of sending from the admin page,
both the Msgs Sent and Msgs Received counters increment. However, the receiver
only generates output when I send well formed XML through
hi
I have a simple queue consumer defined in a spring context, defining
"connectionFactory", "jmsDest", and a consumer from the class "JmsTemplate".
It works well.
Now, the client should decide if it wants to handle the message and return
it to the queue if not. How can i do this? using acknowled
I just tried my app with the 5.3 SNAPSHOT and when I run it I see my
process is consuming messages but every single one of them is always
left on the queue. This even when my JMS Session is AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE
On Sep 15, 2009, at 2:40 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
On 15 Sep 2009, at 07:33, Robert Nic
What has changed in the 5.3 SNAPSHOT since Hermes gives me the
following error now when performing discovery
Has anything changed in regards to how you setup Hermes discovery with
5.3 SNAPSHOT vs 5.20?
hermes.HermesException: Failed to retrieve RMIServer stub:
javax.naming.ServiceUnavaila
On 15 Sep 2009, at 13:01, dbczak wrote:
the consumers do have normal url's (see TIPServer.java). But for
the sender,
what url do I use to send to multiple consumers?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Duplicate-Messages-on-Listener-Restart-tp25440673p25452663.html
Sent
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:01 AM, dbczak wrote:
>
> the consumers do have normal url's (see TIPServer.java). But for the sender,
> what url do I use to send to multiple consumers?
Just use the normal URL - tcp://:
If you want all subscribers to get a copy of a message, then you
should be using t
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Francesco Mascioli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I wrote a simple program using c++ sample, implementing a Producer and a
> Consumer class.
>
> Producer is asynchronous and put data in the queue at high rate (i.e. 1000
> msg/sec).
>
> Consumer is synchronous a
at first, thanks for helping me.
so, now my TOPIC is dealing with 3200 publishers.
but i want more capability.
is there any advices for increasing my ActiveMQ Performance?
--system-
cpu : pentium4 3.0Ghz
Physical Ram : 2Ghz
Network : Very Fast
ActiveMQ Version = 5.2 Release
Hi,
I am trying to create a bridge between activemq and Websphere MQ but it is
throwing an exception, that it failed to connect to the Queue Manager.
The activemq.xml conf i am using is as follows:
the consumers do have normal url's (see TIPServer.java). But for the sender,
what url do I use to send to multiple consumers?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Duplicate-Messages-on-Listener-Restart-tp25440673p25452663.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive
On 15 Sep 2009, at 11:29, dbczak wrote:
I used fanout because I need the producer to send the same message to
multiple consumers - but only once to each consumer. How do I do this
without getting duplicates when the consumer restarts? What should
the url
be?
--
View this message in contex
I used fanout because I need the producer to send the same message to
multiple consumers - but only once to each consumer. How do I do this
without getting duplicates when the consumer restarts? What should the url
be?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Duplicate-Messages
On 15 Sep 2009, at 07:33, Robert Nicholson wrote:
On each occasion when I notice messages are no longer being
delivered. If I restart my app after restarting the broker the
messages begin to deliver.
On Sep 15, 2009, at 12:56 AM, Rob Davies wrote:
On 15 Sep 2009, at 06:42, Robert Nichol
28 matches
Mail list logo
