So I realise that AMQ broadcasts on _default.ActiveMQ-4. and the java
libraries discover it just fine. However, to any other Bonjour client this
will be invisible since it's missing the protocol and domain (ie.
_default.ActiveMQ-4._tcp.local). Is there any way to adjust it so it's a
'real' Bonj
Do i have to install and configure Camel or it is done as part of AMQ 5.2
installation?
Any further clues in to camel-http component will be appriciated.
-vezee
---
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, vezee wrote:
>
> Similiar to Biztalk, can AMQ post messages
Hello,
I am a little confused about something and am having a hard time finding the
information in the documentation, although I definitely think its possible I
just don't know how to read it. In either a transacted session or a client
acknowledge mode session, if a consumer fails to commit or
I found this problem when I was trying to do a mysqldump --single-transaction
--all-databases which blocks on trying to do FLUSH TABLES which never
succeeds as something is holding a lock.
After sending this information to MySQL Enterprise Support, it turns out
that ActiveMQ is holding a lock bec
If i am adding the below content to activemq.xml .. is it not exposing the
REST interface?
---
http://server1.com:61333"/>
MessageServlet
org.apache.activemq.web.MessageServlet
1
destinationOptions
Hi again,
if it turns out to be a consumer, you could use the concept of a
Virtual topics to have several groups of consumers,
each group getting a message copy, but the group members sharing the
load.
To your question, You need to decide on a strategy what you do in case
of slow consumer
Having the same issue. Getting "No clientID header specified" in the browser.
Anyone any clue?
-vezee
-
hb7 wrote:
>
> I'm using activemq-4.1.0 (binary distribution) on a Debian/Linux AMD64.
> I'm
> running amq as a standalone server by calling:
>
> bin/ac
Hi Tanel,
It would be worth disabling flow control - e.g.
disable flow control by setting the producerFlowControl flag to false
on a destination policy in the Broker configuration - e.g.
memoryLimit="1mb">
Hi.
We have 1 producer app and 2 consumers in total. Messages are distributed
evenly between 2 separate topics.
Slow consumer should not be a problem, both consumers use
java.util.concurrent Executors working off an unbounded queue to process the
incoming messages and every attempt has been made
Environment: JDK1.5, JBoss 5.1.0GA, ActiveMQ 5.2.0(Embedded broker in JBoss)
My test program is very simple, a MDB is deployed in JBoss to receive a
message from the queue, and send the message to a topic after receiving it.
I followed all of the configuration steps in apache
website[http://activ
Hi,
We post messages to a topic, which is consumed by 4 consumers. Some messages
end-up in the DQL. Is it possible to know the consumer(s) that 'rejected'
the message ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DLQ-and-topic-tp25254349p25254349.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai
Have you commented the "org.jboss.ejb.plugins.MetricsInterceptor"
in jboss.xml?
Seyfula I. Seyfula wrote:
>
> Environment: ActiveMQ 5.2, JBoss 5.1GA
>
> Hello
>
> I have problem trying to send messages from EJB 3.0 bean from JBoss to
> ActiveMQ. I receive the following error: Transaction 'XI
I have tried almost all of the ways, but the result is failed, can anyone
help me?
Neo Wang wrote:
>
> Environment: ActiveMQ 5.2, JBoss 5.1GA, JDK 5
>
> I have configured the integration of JBoss and ActiveMQ(The embedded
> broker), in my test, a db update and jms message sending will be acte
I have the same problem as you, and our environment is same. I am also trying
to find out the reason. Any progress about it?
Seyfula I. Seyfula wrote:
>
> Environment: ActiveMQ 5.2, JBoss 5.1GA
>
> Hello
>
> I have problem trying to send messages from EJB 3.0 bean from JBoss to
> ActiveMQ. I
Hi Nishant,
Stomp 1.0 supports only string headers, so it's probably something with the
conversion that gets you always a false value. Currently you have to do your
own conversions from string to the type you want to use. This is something
we are looking to improve in Stomp 1.1 spec.
Cheers
--
De
15 matches
Mail list logo