On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Adrian Co wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ 5.2.0, and I'm trying to use the option to configure a
> broker using properties file. (i.e. I don't want dependency on spring/xbean)
>
> See http://activemq.apache.org/broker-properties-uri.html
>
> Configuring th
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, vezee wrote:
>
> Similiar to Biztalk, can AMQ post messages from Q directly to a webservice
> withour our writing any listener or consumer code?
This is something that can easily be achieved with Apache Camel. If I
recall correctly, the camel-http component can sen
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 12:24 PM, vezee wrote:
>
> AMQ-5.2, OS-Solaris 10
>
> Since Pure master-slave has automatic failback issue(as per the doc), for
> the purpose of prototype, i have setup Shared File System Master Slave using
> a single server, running two brokers and pointing to the same data
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 5:10 PM, vezee wrote:
>
>
> Its been a while since the below post. So, i have a Qn in regards to
> Master-Slave clustering:
>
> Is fail-back still an issue in Master-Slave clustering? Any idea when its
> gonna be fixed?
There is currently no fail-back feature in ActiveMQ. T
Its been a while since the below post. So, i have a Qn in regards to
Master-Slave clustering:
Is fail-back still an issue in Master-Slave clustering? Any idea when its
gonna be fixed?
Clustering using Shared (FS/DB) seems to be the only solution at this moment
and is not a great idea for imple
AMQ-5.2, OS-Solaris 10
Since Pure master-slave has automatic failback issue(as per the doc), for
the purpose of prototype, i have setup Shared File System Master Slave using
a single server, running two brokers and pointing to the same data
store(solaris filesystem). I am using the example produc
there are a bunch of related issues fixed for 5.3. Please try out the
current snapshot[1] to validate your use case.
[1]
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.3-SNAPSHOT/
2009/8/27 SowmyaD
>
> Hi,
>
> We are using Activemq 5.2.0 with
Not sure there is any easy way. One option may be to check out:
org.apache.activemq.broker.Broker.setAdminConnectionContext(ConnectionContext)
where you have an option to specify the ConnectionContext used by JMX
operations.
2009/8/27
> Hi,
>
> I am evaluating using JMX to do some management, i
Hi,
I am evaluating using JMX to do some management, including moving
messages between queues. I'm currently trying to do it using the
WebConsole, just to see how it works before spending time on
development.
We are currently using the JaasAuthenticationPlugin, which adds a
SecurityContext to the
that is the connection factory from the RAR, (note the .ra package) Jboss is
responsible for populating its jndi space with artifact that originate from
a deployed RAR. Have a peek at the ra.xml conatined in the .rar file to see
the contract.
2009/8/27 moonbird
>
> ...now I am getting a little
...now I am getting a little bit confused. I can see the ActiveMQ
ConnectionFactory registered in my Global-JNDI-Namespace. (Did you see what
I posted in the JBoss forum ?) So did I find a bug ? In your described case
no other JMS-Provider than JBoss Messaging could register objects in JBoss
JNDI
...now I am getting a little bit confused. I can see the ActiveMQ
ConnectionFactory registered in my Global-JNDI-Namespace. (Did you see what
I posted in the JBoss forum ?) So did I find a bug ? In your described case
no other JMS-Provider than JBoss Messaging could register objects in JBoss
JNDI
12 matches
Mail list logo
