Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

2009-07-16 Thread mkonda
I think (not just in my case), it should be configurable - defaulting to localhost. One of the issues I have is to connect to the server remotely - to monitor and manage - which is THE main purpose of JMX. This is not being served if you leave the hardcoding. Thanks Madhu bsnyder wrote: > > O

Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

2009-07-16 Thread Jose Luna
- Original Message > From: Bruce Snyder > To: users@activemq.apache.org > Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 10:54:24 AM > Subject: Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:21 AM, mkondawrote: > > > > Hello All > > > > I have changed the m

Problems running activemq 5.2 + mysql persistence

2009-07-16 Thread Fec
Hi all, I'm a newbie using ActiveMQ, I`m trying to do persistence in mysql . Following the steps in Apache i have the following exception: ERROR DefaultDatabaseLocker - Failed to acquire lock: com.mysql.jdbc.exceptions.MySQLSyntax ErrorException: Access denied for user 'activemq'@'%' to

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP: how to send to temp queue?

2009-07-16 Thread Timothy Bish
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 07:46 -0700, Ivan Pechorin wrote: > > Actually its not nearly as hard as all that. Each of the Destination > > classes in CMS extends from cms::Destination which defines a clone > > method. When you receive a message that has a replyTo destination you > > can simply clone th

Re: Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

2009-07-16 Thread Bruce Snyder
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:21 AM, mkonda wrote: > > Hello All > > I have changed the managementContext in activemq.xml config to point to a > new port: > >   >             createConnector="true"/> >   > > My broker config is: > > dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data"> > > > > As you can see,

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP: how to send to temp queue?

2009-07-16 Thread Ivan Pechorin
> Actually its not nearly as hard as all that. Each of the Destination > classes in CMS extends from cms::Destination which defines a clone > method. When you receive a message that has a replyTo destination you > can simply clone the destination and use the new instance you created to > create

Re: Unable to have multiple consumers on the same broker

2009-07-16 Thread kkarank
Hi All, Thanks for your replies. Here is the code I am trying to use - Client 1 - subscribing to messages on '/queue/testing1' . $this->con=new Stomp($host); // connect $this->con->connect(); $this->con->subscribe('/queue/testing1'); . Client 2 - subs

Re: ActiveMQ-CPP: how to send to temp queue?

2009-07-16 Thread Timothy Bish
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 06:56 -0700, Ivan Pechorin wrote: > Hello > > I'm trying to implement Request-Response pattern with: > - ActiveMQ broker, > - NMS (C#) on the client (requestor) side, > - CMS (ActiveMQ-CPP) on the server (responder) side. > > This pattern is described very clearly > - f

Changing the ManagmentContext to point to non-localhost

2009-07-16 Thread mkonda
Hello All I have changed the managementContext in activemq.xml config to point to a new port: My broker config is: As you can see, I have added brokerName and useJmx tags so that my serivice url can be exposed to JMX Clients/console. However, when I start up the activ

ActiveMQ-CPP: how to send to temp queue?

2009-07-16 Thread Ivan Pechorin
Hello I'm trying to implement Request-Response pattern with: - ActiveMQ broker, - NMS (C#) on the client (requestor) side, - CMS (ActiveMQ-CPP) on the server (responder) side. This pattern is described very clearly - for JMS: http://remark.wordpress.com/articles/implementing-request-respons

Re: Is there a way to know if NMS is actually connected using Failover transport ?

2009-07-16 Thread Timothy Bish
On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 00:35 -0700, Michel Van Hoof wrote: > Hi, > > I have a situation where a lot of our clients are out of our control and so > is the network/internet. > > To counter this, we want to use the failover protocol which handles the > whole thing for us (yay).. However, they also ne

Re: Multiple consumer in exclusive mode does not work.

2009-07-16 Thread Gary Tully
Exclusive Consumers is designed to work that way. If you have very high load and message spooling to disk you may be seeing some duplicate message delivery. Some issues around occasional duplicate delivery were addresses on trunk over the past few months. The current 5.3-SNAPSHOT should behave bet

NMS / ActveMQ questions regarding network of brokers and ByteMessages.

2009-07-16 Thread Michel Van Hoof
Hi, After reading just about every article, documentation and forum about ActiveMQ / NMS the last couple of weeks, a couple of things are still unclear so i was hoping someone here could enlighten me :s ByteMessages We are looking at a situation where a lot of files between 5 to 200Mb (ocasiona

Is there a way to know if NMS is actually connected using Failover transport ?

2009-07-16 Thread Michel Van Hoof
Hi, I have a situation where a lot of our clients are out of our control and so is the network/internet. To counter this, we want to use the failover protocol which handles the whole thing for us (yay).. However, they also need to be sending us data and this is where the issue comes in: when us

Re: Authentication level

2009-07-16 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Igor, you can always write your own plugin to do that. You can take a look at the current security plugins http://activemq.apache.org/security.html and take it from there. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyd