Re: Durable Subscriber and unclean disconnection

I should have explained - that although this is client-side configuration - there is a handshake between the client and broker on initialization. The lowest value of maxInactivityDuration is used by both peers of the transport (client and broker). So if your client bounced - or the network

Re: Determining the client's AMQ interface within a JAAS login module

Sorry that I've taken so long to come back to this. However I think I have a solution. JaasCertificateAuthenticationBroker presently makes a check at line 73 as to whether there is a security context: if (context.getSecurityContext() == null) { I am wondering if an additional check should be

Re: Durable Subscriber and unclean disconnection

Thanks Rob. I had a look at those, but they appear to address the Client configuration. My problem is if the Client unexpectedly goes away and comes back, the durable subscriber is unable to re-connect because ActiveMQ 5.2 says that they are already connected. I will admit, I have yet to test if

Setting up network of brokers without shared database or file system

I am using ActiveMQ 5.2 with following configuration: http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>

How do I specify max retries for delivery and DLQ policies for dynamic queues

I am using ActiveMQ 5.2 with following configuration: http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";>

Re: Possible memory leak in statistics gathering

I can check the 5.3 snapshot, but I don't see the relationship between the two leaks. In my scenario, the consumers and sessions aren't meant to be reclaimed; they're meant to be long-lived. The problem is that they seem to be hanging onto a couple of Statistics objects for each message they hand

Re: Failed to build body from bytes

Hi >  Failed to build body from bytes. Reason: java.io.IOException: No > ClassLoaders found for: com.corpus.biemedia.servlet.MailEx I'd say you don't have the MailEx class on the same path as ActiveMQ. I suspect it's not good enough to have it inside the webapp because the activemq listener probab

Re: Large number of queues (HowTo)

Awesome! - thanks for getting this info together! will put this on the Apache site On 18 May 2009, at 19:27, Jose Luna wrote: Hello, We have the requirement of creating a very large number of queues (tens of thousands) in a single broker. My searches turned up several others trying to

Re: too many open files

> At this point it is clear that it is an operating system issue. Frederik is correct on this, I tested with CentOS 5. Here is an example of setting the hard and soft limit: *softnofile 8192 *hardnofile 65535 After that: ulimit -n 8192

Large number of queues (HowTo)

Hello, We have the requirement of creating a very large number of queues (tens of thousands) in a single broker. My searches turned up several others trying to do something similar, but with no results. We were recently able to accomplish this, so I decided to write a little howto. All of thi

Re: Publishing to Topic is very slow in higher loads ActiveMQ5.2.

Hi, In continuation with previous email, more information regarding the issue: we have analysed the logs and observed that there is some pattern of varying publishing times, for every few seconds. example: At the full load, the event published at 14:49:24,352 took TotalTime : 55 ms and then

Re: Possible memory leak in statistics gathering

this leak sounds a lot like https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2178 that is fixed on trunk and available in the current 5.3-snapshot. 2009/5/16 emersonf > > Hi, > > I've been running some load tests on a Spring Integration system backed by > ActiveMQ 5.2.0. I noticed that one of my ap

Re: JBoss and XAConnectionFactory

I've got the same question... ... anyone here to answer it ? :confused: Thanks, Bertrand -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JBoss-and-XAConnectionFactory-tp16961291p23595872.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Integrating Apache ActiveMQ with JBoss and XA Transactions

Which version of ActiveMQ am I using? ActiveMQ 5.2.0 Details of my environment # OS: Windows XP SP3 32bit # JVM: SUN JDK 1.6.0_13 # Application Server: JBoss 5.0.1 # Other: Mule 2.2.1 Dear all, I'm trying

Re: Queue URI Address

Hi, I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but maybe a Rest API ( http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html) can help you. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Sun, May 1

Failed to build body from bytes

My activeMQ version is 5.2.0 which is embedded inside Jboss4.2.2.Ga. when i am sending an object message Using Active producer inside a servlet i am getting the following exception Failed to build body from bytes. Reason: java.io.IOException: No ClassLoaders found for: com.corpus.biemedia.servle

Re: Durable Subscriber and unclean disconnection

Have you disabled the maxInactivityDuration by setting it to zero ? If you have - your broker may not detect the transport socket has expired - and cleanly closed the connection. See - http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html cheers, Rob On 18 May 2009, at 10:32, lyall wrote:

Re: How to know whether embedded broker is stoped?

On 18 May 2009, at 09:32, JS75 wrote: Dear Sir: Here is my scenario - multi-producers and multi-consumers in the same application. I am sure all consumers and producers are closed before I close the application. And please note that I close the application by terminate JVM. (so I may not cl

Re: Durable Subscriber and unclean disconnection

Thank you Gary. I had found another post regarding this same 'disconnected durable subscriber' issue. Simply saying 'BPEL should correctly disconnect', does not help if the BPEL server should happen to fail - power, hardware, network disconnect, etc. The new connection needs to replace the old, i

Re: Durable Subscriber and unclean disconnection

seems like a bpel process un/re-deployment logic should be doing an unsubscribe to remove the durable subscription. Failing this, an activemq feature where a configuration option on a durable subscriber could specify an inactivityTimeout after which time an inactive durable subscription would expi

How to know whether embedded broker is stoped?

Dear Sir: Here is my scenario - multi-producers and multi-consumers in the same application. I am sure all consumers and producers are closed before I close the application. And please note that I close the application by terminate JVM. (so I may not close broker properly?) So sometimes I found so

Re: too many open files

In <23592103.p...@talk.nabble.com> DataMover wrote: > At this point it is clear that it is an [Centos] issue. You're not allowed to raise the ulimit boundaries above the configured hard limit, that's why your attemts with the ulimit command fails. I haven't worked with Centos, but in my debian

Re: Installing DLQ Broker plugin (interceptor) for 5.3.0

Hi, sometimes opening the eyes a bit more have great effect. Indeed, I missed out the correct name of the class to use. Thanks a lot! Felix Jose Luna-2 wrote: > > > > > > > - Original Message >> From: fehm >> To: users@activemq.apache.org >> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 7:25:57

Re: too many open files

Thanks guys. At this point it is clear that it is an operating system issue. Since it "does" work on windows, it is too bad that linux needs some tweaking to make it work. The windows test was done with a default install. As for Centos: We did in fact put the ulimit command in the activemq scr