Thats awesome. saves a lot of time for me as a developer trying to do my own
synchronization.
thanks Tim.
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 06:44 -0700, nmittal wrote:
>> below is an excerpt from the book "ActiveMQ in action"...
>> The JMS spec specifically defines concurrency for
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 07:08 -0700, nmittal wrote:
> Hi All,
> If I am not mistaken, then destinations are created from Sessions.
> (session->createTopic() or session->createQueue())
>
> Then how come, destinations are required to be thread safe while Sessions
> are not?
>
> thanks
> Nishant
Main
On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 06:44 -0700, nmittal wrote:
> below is an excerpt from the book "ActiveMQ in action"...
> The JMS spec specifically defines concurrency for various objects in the JMS
> API and requires that only a few objects support concurrent access. The
> ConnectionFactory, Connection and
First off, I am a newbie when it comes to JMS & ActiveMQ.
I have been looking into a messaging solution to serve as middleware for a
message producer that will insert XML messages into a queue via HTTP POST.
The producer is an existing system written in C++ that cannot be modified
(so Java and t
Hi All,
If I am not mistaken, then destinations are created from Sessions.
(session->createTopic() or session->createQueue())
Then how come, destinations are required to be thread safe while Sessions
are not?
thanks
Nishant
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CMS%3A-Session%
below is an excerpt from the book "ActiveMQ in action"...
The JMS spec specifically defines concurrency for various objects in the JMS
API and requires that only a few objects support concurrent access. The
ConnectionFactory, Connection and Destination objects are required to
support concurrent ac
Understood. Thanks.
Timothy Bish wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:11 -0700, nmittal wrote:
>> Hi All, in the examples that come with the CMS distribution, I see the
>> following...
>> class SimpleProducer: public Runnable
>>
>> is there a reason why a producer has to inherit from Runnable.
Hi there,
please find comments inline...
On May 1, 2009, at 12:10 AM, Websphere and ActiveMQ wrote:
Today I have configured ActiveMQ and Websphere successfully, also I
can send
message by my Application.
Note: I use JMS API to send/receive message.
Now I have following questions.
1. After
Hi there,
sorry to say, but the IBM guy is kind of wrong. You can bind AMQ
administered objects
in any JNDI store. This having said, the ActiveMQ JNDI implementation
takes the information
from a file called jndi.properties on the classpath. You cannot
programmatically bind objects
into the
