Re: Queue message order

Hi Andreas, That's an insightful question and there is a good answer, albeit complicated. The test is trying to validate the exception handling logic in our STOMP client. To prevent the poison pill problem where the same bad message gets redelivered over and over in an infinite loop, the logic f

Re: Queue message order

Thanks, Bruce. I'll give this a try. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Bruce Snyder wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple > > STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered o

Re: Queue message order

Hi Roger, may be I missed something, but if the application doesn't need the messages to be in order, why are you testing for it ? Just wondering Andreas On Apr 29, 2009, at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover wrote: Hi, Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple STOMP Perl

Re: Queue message order

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:15 AM, Roger Hoover wrote: > Hi, > > Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order?  I have a simple > STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered out of order.  I've > run it against AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0 in with both persistent and > non-persistent mess

Queue message order

Hi, Are queued messages supposed to be delivered in order? I have a simple STOMP Perl script below that shows messages delivered out of order. I've run it against AMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0 in with both persistent and non-persistent messages. Note from the message ids and timestamps that the newer mes

Re: AMQ 5.2 no longer sets persistent header for STOMP

Thanks, Dejan. I was wrong about this. The behavior is the same on AMQ 4. Neither version sends that header to STOMP clients. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:06 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote: > Hi Roger, > > sounds like a bug. Can you file a Jira issue for this? > > Cheers > -- > Dejan Bosanac > > Open So

Re: Libraries to include while compiling my activemq-cpp code

On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 08:35 -0700, nmittal wrote: > > > Timothy Bish wrote: > > > > > > It still appears if your environment is working against you. You need > > to spend some time figuring out what is installed and where. > > > >> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libuuid.so when s

Re: pendingMessageLimitStrategy not working

I'm not positive, but I believe that the pendingMessageLimitStrategy only works with topics. - Freelance Application Development Consultant LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbekasjr http://www.linkedin.com/in/johnbekasjr -- View this message in context: http://www.nabb

Re: Libraries to include while compiling my activemq-cpp code

Timothy Bish wrote: > > > It still appears if your environment is working against you. You need > to spend some time figuring out what is installed and where. > >> /usr/bin/ld: skipping incompatible /usr/lib/libuuid.so when searching >> for -luuid > > This error usually means that you don't

Re: Performance of high number of topics or selectors

There are some hard limits in terms of fds and memory utilisation both for destinations and connections. The simplest approach to achieve scalability at these levels (100k topics) is to divide and conquer using a network of brokers and a random

Re: Performance of high number of topics or selectors

Well, the send to everyone and manually filter turned out to be a really bad idea -- I guess the message gets copied too many times or whatever. It gets an OOM error with a 512 MB heap for 10,000 clients. So I'm still looking for a better way, whether it be general approach or tuning to handle hi

Reconnect of the durable consumers after ActiveMQ restart/fail

Hi, I have this setup where I set few durable consumers (setMessageListener) and they succesfully register on ActiveMQ. But as soon as the ActiveMQ shutdowns (by whatever the cause is) and is later restarted all the previous registred consumers are left hanging somwhere and are not visible as reg

Re: AMQ 5.2 no longer sets persistent header for STOMP

Hi Roger, sounds like a bug. Can you file a Jira issue for this? Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/ ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Blog - http://www.nighttale.net On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Roger Hoover wrote: > Hi, > > In AMQ 4