Re: ActiveMQ 5.2 - broker stops sending messages

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Ron Reynolds wrote: > i know it's a vague subject line and i'm almost certain it's been asked > before but i'm under a tight deadline on a near-production system and i need > help.  the situation is this: > > - single broker (5.2) with only 4 queues (not topics)

Re: ActiveMQ 5.2 - broker stops sending messages

This looks similar to a known issue - AMQ-2009 - can you try the latest 5.3 snaphot ? cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://fusesource.com http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ On 23 Mar 2009, at 19:53, Ron Reynolds wrote: i know it's a vague subject line and i'm almost certain it's been asked bef

ActiveMQ 5.2 - broker stops sending messages

i know it's a vague subject line and i'm almost certain it's been asked before but i'm under a tight deadline on a near-production system and i need help. the situation is this: - single broker (5.2) with only 4 queues (not topics) - default broker config with prefetchPolicy.queuePrefetch=0 ad

Re: Clustering for HA

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Erik Drolshammer wrote: > Hi! > We try to set up two brokers according to [1] to get some redundancy in our > solution. The shared filesystem is based on GFS, but it doesn't seem to work > that well. The master node use a lot of cpu, but the throughput is horrible

Re: Question about Active MQ network of brokers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:34 AM, mffrench wrote: > > Thanks for your answer. Would like to know if there is a sense to raise a > JIRA for this ? It could be a good way to simplify the configuration ... Sure, for any improvements you'd like to see, please create a JIRA issue to provide your expla

Re: NFS locking issue for Master/Slave

I have found a solution!!! NFSv4. In it's default configuration on NetApp (DataOnTop 7.3.1, I suspect 7.2.x will be the same) and a simple client side mount option: mount -t nfs4 server:/vol/vol_mqdata_tst01 mqdata_tst01 With in 30 seconds the passive node can pick up the lock! NFS V3 wil

Re: Problem trying to route with Interceptors

Also attaching the Java class. Andreas --- Progress Software GmbH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Agrippinawerft 26, 50678 Koeln; Niederlassung: Fuerstenrieder Str. 279, 81377 Muenchen Amtsgericht Koeln, HRB 15620; Geschaeftsfuehrung: David Ireland

Re: Problem trying to route with Interceptors

Hi again , Well, I am not a Camel expert and don't know all the components from the top of my head. What I can say is that what you are trying to achieve would be possible with a very simple camel processor. Perhaps it is even simpler to extract the color from the message body in an even

Re: Problem trying to route with Interceptors

Hi. I need to use interceptors because I need to inspect the body of the message. My filters are based on some characters of the body. With camel, you can only check if some string is contained in the body (may be i'm wrong?) Andreas Gies-3 wrote: > > Hi there, > > Apart from the question

Re: Problem trying to route with Interceptors

Hi there, Apart from the question why you want to do such a thin in an interceptor instead of using virtual destinations or a camel route Could you share your activemq.xml to let us see how you hooked in the plugin in the broker ? Perhaps you could include some logging statements in y

Re: Reconnection

Hi there, i assume that you have set the clientId and consumer name to the same value after the reconnect ? Best regards Andreas On Mar 23, 2009, at 5:15 PM, dongabda wrote: I have a messagebroker and a producer in Java (Both in same PC). The consumer is in other PC and C++(activemq-cpp.2

Re: Question about Active MQ network of brokers

Thanks for your answer. Would like to know if there is a sense to raise a JIRA for this ? It could be a good way to simplify the configuration ... ++ bsnyder wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, mffrench wrote: >> >> About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ???

Re: actual status of activeMQ and AMQP

Hello, As you maybe know the future AMQP 1.0 release is out of the box soon (http://jira.amqp.org/confluence/display/AMQP/Advanced+Message+Queuing+Protocol)... And as you maybe notice too a famous IT enterprise work now on the AMQP specification : Microsoft. So it's now more only a redhat businne

exception and exclusive queue

Hello, There is no exception raised when I open a jms consumer on an exclusive queue which is already locked by another consumer ? The second consumer does not receive any messages but I would like to get an exception to close it naturally... How is this possible ? Thanks -- View this messa

Re: Problem trying to route with Interceptors

any ideas? DanielR wrote: > > I have a main queue named QUEUE.COLOR. > 1 Producer send a lot of messages to QUEUE.COLOR > Messages only have "red ..." or "blue..." in their body > > In trying to route the messages with "red ..." to QUEUE.RED and the > messages with "blue..." to QUEUE.BLUE ON

Re: Question about Active MQ network of brokers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 10:13 AM, mffrench wrote: > > About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ??? There's no special value for that. The solution is to note the most amount of hops that a message might need to make across brokers to reach a subscription. Note that messages

Reconnection

I have a messagebroker and a producer in Java (Both in same PC). The consumer is in other PC and C++(activemq-cpp.2.2.4) I use Topics with durableconsumer. When the messagebroker is stopped and I launch the consumer, it gives a CMSException. This is perfect. but when all is running (messagebroker,

Re: Question about Active MQ network of brokers

About the networkTTL is there a way to set it to infinite value ??? Thanks ... ++ bsnyder wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 9:40 AM, mffrench wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I would like to know if it's possible to configure ActiveMQ to route >> messages from a broker A to a broker C through a bro

Clustering for HA

Hi! We try to set up two brokers according to [1] to get some redundancy in our solution. The shared filesystem is based on GFS, but it doesn't seem to work that well. The master node use a lot of cpu, but the throughput is horrible. Can anyone point me to some resources describing the setup

Re: New question about activemq network

This thread comes from a misunderstanding. Please ignore it ;) ++ mffrench wrote: > > Hello, > > I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on > the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final > destination broker. For me this kind of routi

Re: Clustering amq

anybody can help ? runshan wrote: > > I've clustered three amq server > > with A configurated a duplex bridge to B and c > uri="static://(tcp://*.*.*.180:61616,tcp://*.*.*.181:61616)"/> > > B and c with no networkConnector configuration > > then two clients Consumer connected to A and B s