Hi guys,
I have a question that if activemq have a producer connections limit when I
create a lot of producer connections to activemq server to send messages
simultaneously.
Well, I have the requirement that a lot of producer connections to access
activemq, how should I tuning activemq server to
We are using ActiveMQ 5.1 & Spring 2.5.4...
We are using ActiveMQ Embeeded broker
vm://localhost?broker.persistent=false
We are sending the email from all these listeners after doing some
logic.when something happens in the SMTP side and if the
Seems like setting prefetchPolicy=1 (or greater, if message volume warrants
it) should activate your multiple consumer threads.
- Gary
steve56 wrote:
>
>
> case 2:
> - set prefetchPolicy = 0
> - now all threads work consuming sequentially (non in parallel!)
> messages. i.e: a thread rece
I'm really mystified by why you want to rely on remote ldap to look up
a connection factory or destinations. I don't think you've thought
through what information needs to be distributed where by what means
and I think you are going towards a much harder to administer
heavyweight solution
Sorry for that stupid question:) - it is clear now.
Postol wrote:
>
> Hello All,
>
> maybe it is a stupid question, but I am little bit confused, which objects
> should be used, when I am developing clients, which will communicate with
> ActiveMQ broker.
>
> I am not sure if I should use typ
You've registered a JMS ExceptionListener with the Connection ?
On 18 Mar 2009, at 18:06, mffrench wrote:
must add I tested the same code with other queuers (QPID, ...) and I
get
exception with these queuers ...
mffrench wrote:
yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (
Hello,
It looks like unsubscribing a durable subscriber using Stomp works only if
the same name has been used both for the client id and for the subscription
name.
This is the setup in the JUnit test in StompTest.java - testDurableUnsub() -
where 'test' is the name for the client and the subscri
must add I tested the same code with other queuers (QPID, ...) and I get
exception with these queuers ...
mffrench wrote:
>
> yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (it's a jms
> listener).
> can you tell me what options I must set to enable the log level in the
> activemq cl
yes my client is connected... and it only receive message (it's a jms
listener).
can you tell me what options I must set to enable the log level in the
activemq client ?
Some netstat
Before killing :
tcp6 0 0 *:61611 *:* LISTEN
18673/java
Is your client really connected? Has it sent or received a message. With
activemq, the connection is created on demand on first but not when the
connection factory is created.
Can you enable debug logging and see what additional information you can
gather?
2009/3/18 mffrench
>
> Here's my JNDI c
UP
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> some times I get an activemq exception (broker side) which appends
> regularly when I do some stress tests (many producers / consumers on the
> broker) and when I do some simple transactionnal tests.
>
> I've some difficulies to reproduce every time nor expl
UP
mffrench wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I do not understand why the routing is done on the GET and not directly on
> the PUT. I do not see the interest to keep the message in the non final
> destination broker. For me this kind of routing raise some questions like
> :
>
> + if you have N nodes if
Here's my JNDI configuration :
java.naming.factory.initial =
org.apache.activemq.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
java.naming.provider.url = tcp://127.0.0.1:61611
connectionFactoryNames = MICHEL
queue.TEST = TEST
As you can see I provide a brokerUrl with tcp://... and I never get any
exception
Hello Huntc,
I read your blog especially the Authorisation part. I think we are talking
about the same thing. The LDAP server I set up also uses ACI to grant or
limit the access to specific topic/queue.
I guess this discussion is mainly about whether ActiveMQ has an embedded
JNDI provider for c
If this is 5.2, and you do not provide a brokerUrl to your activemq
connection factory then the failover transport will be used by default and
it will block waiting to reconnect.
Provide a brokerUrl and use "tcp://..." and you will get the exception you
require.
2009/3/18 mffrench
>
> Hello,
>
>
Hello,
if I kill ActiveMQ, there is no exception raised to my connected JMS
listener and so my client doesn't detect the link is broken with ActiveMQ. I
think this is a bug which should be corrected. Is there any issue about this
?
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/
2009/3/17 DanielR :
>
> I can't get it working... any examples would be nice please
Here's a bunch of examples...
http://camel.apache.org/examples.html
The spring XQuery example might be a good start...
http://camel.apache.org/spring-xquery-example.html
you might find its easier to write your p
2009/3/18 Antsa :
>
>
> huntc wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious as to what is trying to be achieved here. Could you please
>> explain why it is useful to perform a naming/directory lookup for a queue
>> or topic name?
>>
> My use case is probably due to my newbie status with JMS.
> Session.createTopic javad
janylj wrote:
>
> I was trying to have a centralized repository of destinations and
> ConnectionFactory. I could use a uniform namespace for destination to
> avoid conflicting. However, I don't want to allow users creating
> destination or ConnectionFactory on the fly. I would like them accessin
19 matches
Mail list logo
