Facing a new issue in ActiveMq (JVM related)

Hi I am facing this JVM issue while using the latest version of AMq. Is this related to JVM version or a compatibility issue with the AMq of JVM. PFB the logs. __ ERROR | wrapper | 2009/01/24 01:25

Re: Message PRIORITY

2009/2/16 Luana87 : > > > > James.Strachan wrote: >> >> 2009/2/16 Luana87 : >>> >>> Hello, >>> I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages >>> sent >>> from only one producer. >>> I am wondering which the correct way is. >>> In particular I would like to understand which t

Socket write timeout filter problem

Hi, During our internal testing we had enabled the socket write timeout filter via the connection url (with a value of 60,000). We noticed that when a message consumer died while processing a message it wasn't retried and just hung around in the work queue; some were in there several hours befo

Re: Severe performance hit upgrading to 5.2.0 from 5.1

Hi, any help on this? 5.2 shouldn't be a few times slower, but I can't find out why. All the other configs are out-of-box defaults. hackingbear wrote: > > Hi, > > I upgraded to 5.2.0 last week and witness my application performance > dropped substantially. I wrote a simple test which does: >

Re: Multiple Producers, single consumer

I have had a discussion with my colleague about exactly this problem. Don't take my advice, but what we came up with is the following: Have one queue on which the producers at the server put messages and the consumers on the client consumes these messages. But to return messages create a return qu

Multiple Producers, single consumer

Hi, I have to design an application where there are multiple producers that send message to the server. The consumer reads the message and should reply to the specific producer with the answer. Is ActiveMQ the right tool for my purpose? Please respond. If yes, can you please outline a brief ide

[ANN] VTD-XML 2.5 released

VTD-XML 2.5 is now released. Please go to https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=110612&package_id=120172&release_id=661376  to download the latest version. Changes from Version 2.4 (2/2009) * Added separate VTD indexing generating and loading (see http://vtd-xml.sf.net/persi

Re: AMQ 4.1.2, FailoverTransport and Firewall

Awesome! I take it no one has seen this problem. Rob Rob Bugh wrote: > > We have this configuration: > - AMQ 4.1.2 > - Client outside of a firewall. Uses FailoverTransport to connect to > brokers. > - Two brokers inside of firewall in master/slave configuration > > Problem: > Upon startup, if

Re: Message PRIORITY

James.Strachan wrote: > > 2009/2/16 Luana87 : >> >> Hello, >> I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages >> sent >> from only one producer. >> I am wondering which the correct way is. >> In particular I would like to understand which the difference is between >> messa

Re: Prefetch=0 how to?

Hi, just added a test that tries to reproduce your problem (testTwoConsumers) http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/activemq/trunk/activemq-core/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/ZeroPrefetchConsumerTest.java?view=markup and everything seems to be working fine. Can you try modifying it to reproroduce the

Re: Message PRIORITY

2009/2/16 Luana87 : > > Hello, > I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages sent > from only one producer. > I am wondering which the correct way is. > In particular I would like to understand which the difference is between > message.setJMSPriority(priority) and sender.s

Message PRIORITY

Hello, I'm starting to use ActiveMQ v5.2.0 and I need to prioritize messages sent from only one producer. I am wondering which the correct way is. In particular I would like to understand which the difference is between message.setJMSPriority(priority) and sender.setPriority(priority) where messag

DefaultMessageListenerContainer with PooledConnectionFactory

Hi, I've read several references and posts like [1], [2] and [3], to decide which should I use, DefaultMessageListenerContainer or SimpleMessageListenerContainer. Once I decide to go with DefaultMessageListenerContainer, should I use a plain ConnectionFactory or a PooledConnectionFactory? DMLC

Installation & Use of ActiveMQ NMS for MSMQ

hi all, I am sorry if this is an out of context post, and please excuse my noobness, however... To set the scene, At my company, we have a setup of 8 load balanced webservers (IIS), that stick a record into "Microsoft" MessageQueue (MSMQ). I have been performing research and testing into using

JCA container or DefaultMessageListenerContainer

I was going through how JMS can be configured using Springs. In one of my previous posts on consumer pooling in JMS I was told I can use any of these. Can anyone please highlight what are the pros and cons of each of these and when to use which. Also how to go about consumer side pooling in case

Re: ActiveMQ client library hanging indefinitely when attempting to use failover URL in conjunction with connection paramters

Hi, you should try setting jms.prefetchPolicy.all to failover transport. The following URL works just fine: failover:(tcp://localhost:61616?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0&keepAlive=true)?jms.prefetchPolicy.all=500&initialReconnectDelay=1&useExponentialBackOff=false&maxReconnectAttempts=0