didn't see a jira - so created one:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2100
On 9 Feb 2009, at 23:14, bonnyr wrote:
Gary,
Why would the collection be used in CLIENT_ACK mode then?
In our application we've got to work in this mode since there's a
processing
chain
that may take
Bonny - agreed - looks like that bit of code has never been
synchronized - will add a fix ...
cheers,
Rob
Rob Davies
http://fusesource.com
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On 9 Feb 2009, at 23:14, bonnyr wrote:
Gary,
Why would the collection be used in CLIENT_ACK mode then?
In our applic
gregory.guibert wrote:
>
> Thank you for the link on OpenDS, it looks great and seems to solve half
> my
> problem (alignment of data) :-)
> ...
> When using a jndi.properties file to create an initial context, the file
> looks like this:
> java.naming.factory.initial = com.sun.jndi.ldap.LdapCtx
Hello,
I tried ActiveMQ JNDI support. It seems to me only for testing, because the
administrative objects are specified in the jndi.properties of client
machine. There is no centralized place to manage the ConnectionFactory or
Destination. And we could not control who could access them.
Is my un
Gary,
Why would the collection be used in CLIENT_ACK mode then?
In our application we've got to work in this mode since there's a processing
chain
that may take a while between delivery of the message and its ack, so
chaging this
mode is not possible for our use case.
We're aware of the fact
That did the trick! Thanks!
Dejan Bosanac wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> try starting the ConsumerEvenetSource (ces.start()).
>
> Cheers
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
>
> Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
> ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
>
>
Gary Tully wrote:
>
> in transacted mode, who is managing the transaction demarcation? In
> other words, where is the session.commit() call?
>
This is a session based transaction as opposed to an external JTA operation.
The COMMIT is, therefore, made against the jms session object.
The call
Hello List,
in Stomp, the only way I know to see if a message is a ObjectMessage, or a
TextMessage, is to check if it contains a "transformation= ..." header.
However, if a subscriber uses the transformation header to tell the broker
which transformation the broker should use for object messages
Bill Schuller wrote:
>
> Do you have a consumer on the destination you are sending to?
>
Many thanks for your answer! For my test, I use a default installation of
ActiveMQ 5.2 or a 5.3 snapshot. There are no other clients, and no
consumers. The main problem however that there is a difference
Is there a way to control the number of ActiveMQ transport threads? We are
finding over 50 in thread dumps and want to know if we can throttle this
number.
Steve
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Can-I-limit-the-number-of-ActiveMQ-Transport-threads--tp21919008p21919008.htm
Thanks. That works!
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Dejan Bosanac wrote:
> Hi Roger,
>
> this is the normal behavior of the "client" acknowledgment mode. The broker
> acknowledges all messages up to the one you specified. So when you ack
> message 3, message 2 is also acked so when you try to a
Do you have a consumer on the destination you are sending to? I¹ll guess
that your problem is that your queue size is limited by something like
with paging disabled. Once the
destination reaches the limit, it blocks the consumer and it times out.
Setting the TTL causes the messages to expire, free
Hi,
try starting the ConsumerEvenetSource (ces.start()).
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
Open Source Integration - http://fusesource.com/
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Blog - http://www.nighttale.net
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:49 PM, darrickc wrote:
>
> I have an embedded broker
Pending Queue Size The number of messages in the queue that have yet to be
delivered to any client
Dispatched Counter The number of message in the queue that have been
delivered to a client, but not yet acknowledged
Enqueue Counter The number of messages that have been sent to this queue
Dequ
Hi, there is currently a known issue that ConsumerInfo shows total number of
consumers instead of just those for the specific destination
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2099
if you're using advisory messages, you might be hit by this bug.
Can you check what consumers JConsole show
Hi Roger,
this is the normal behavior of the "client" acknowledgment mode. The broker
acknowledges all messages up to the one you specified. So when you ack
message 3, message 2 is also acked so when you try to ack it later again you
receive an error.
The solution for your use case would be to us
Jonnie,
in transacted mode, who is managing the transaction demarcation? In
other words, where is the session.commit() call?
2009/2/8 sweetjonnie :
>
> at least one in the thread mentioned persistence and i wonder if my problem
> is related.
>
> i am newbie/retarded and cannot get my embedded brok
> I'm not quite able to cause this to happen in a simple test case. Perhaps
> this is to do with some
> thread timing/scheduling issues in the simple test case vs our application.
>
Yea, that is fairly typical.
> However, are you in a
> position to explain what the deliveredMessage collection is u
We have consumer on a queue in our project and spring's ScheduledTimerTask
which closes, releases reference on it, then creates and starts a new one
periodically (ones per 6 hours). When application stays idle for a long time
and consumer stays idle too, ConsumerInfo shows number of consumers > 1.
Hi Bjørn,
I think that may be a copy n' paste error in the documentation. The
payload in that advisory message is the original message, so there is
really no need for additional properties.
You need to do something like:
Message msg = advisoryConsumer.receive(1000);
ActiveMQMessage
Thank you for the link on OpenDS, it looks great and seems to solve half my
problem (alignment of data) :-)
As seen on Joe's Blog, the binding/lookup of any Java Object can be
performed on a LDAP server using the LdapCtxFactory provided by Sun.
http://joefernandezblog.blogspot.com/
When using a j
21 matches
Mail list logo
