I ran into some related problems (on trunk/5.3) where deleting a queue
basically completely hosed the broker but I've been completely unable
to reproduce this outside the javaee5 tck environment. However all
the tests I've tried in "public" environments have worked great so
most likely it
OK
I have been unable to get ActiveMQ to work in a system with two connected
networks
in the this set up
system A has two NICs
NIC 0 connected to the public network
NIC 1 connected to a private network
I have configured AMQ to only listen on the private network for messages. I
have posted th
I will be doing the same and will share my results.
On 1/27/09 2:10 PM, "JasonCzerak" wrote:
> Well, i'll be finding out in a few weeks here. ;-)
I believe this is fixed in 5.3 - (trunk) - which will be released in
the next few weeks or so
On 27 Jan 2009, at 20:14, MaenXe wrote:
Can I bump my own thread? It seems there are other users who have
this
issue, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in fixing it.
Is this
a bug
Can I bump my own thread? It seems there are other users who have this
issue, but there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest in fixing it. Is this
a bug?
M@
MaenXe wrote:
>
> I have a couple of Queues that I am unable to completely get rid of. If I
> delete the Queue either from JMX(using r
JasonCzerak wrote:
>
>
>
> JasonCzerak wrote:
>>
>> How's this working out for folks? Any gotchya's? How about tips on
>> performances, mount options, vol options, tcp/ip tuning for small files,
>> etc etc etc.
>>
>> I read of locking issues on the 4.x versions, this has all been solved on
Hey all,
One of the developers in our company is writing an application that uses NMS
and every once in a while the queue becomes unresponsive to consumers, although
producers can continue to produce to it. Other times a message will get stuck
at the top of the queue and producers and consumer
Fair enough. All my list mail goes into one folder, which
means I can't visually separate emails from different lists.
I can, but only by thinking that subjects without markers
belong to ActiveMQ. Hope I don't end up on any other lists
that don't add markers - then I'm into having to have separat
I am logging messages using log4j to a queue on an ActiveMQBroker.
Now, I want dependent on whether a flag is on to be able to log to a broker
specified by let's say: java.naming.provider.url = tcp://machineA:61616, and
if it is off to log to java.naming.provider.url = tcp://machineB:61616
When
Hello,
I have a solution deployed using AMQ5.1, and since it has come to my
attention that triversal issue on AMQ when adding a [;] simicolon on the
ActiveMQ link - http://:8161/admin/xml/;queues.jsp, it exposes
the filesystem.
Knowing that we use Jetty as an embedded server, how do we go about
10 matches
Mail list logo
