Hi
We're using activemq 5.1.0, the client connects to the broker using
failover:
new ActiveMQConnectionFactory( "failover:" + brokerUri );
The problem is that after the brokers restart there seems to be a problem
with the reconnect of the client (Received unexpected response for command
id ...)
Hi gary，
The fix can migrate to version 5.2.0? I think it is a critical bug.
Leon Liu
Gary Tully 写道:
> Leon,
> can you try a recent snapshot[1], I think your issue may be another
> variant of https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2020 which I
> fixed last week.
>
> [1]
> http://people.apa
Hi
There is no any news about the ActiveMQ 5.2.0 release in [1][2].
But I saw you updated the news in the confluence page.
Maybe we need export the static page files from confluence.
[1]http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/
[2]http://activemq.apache.org/
Willem
Gary Tully wrote:
> The Apache Active
Okay so what I'm gleaming from my reading is that I have a VM configured
broker so it runs inside my Java process (In Spring / Tomcat). This is
actually preferable to installing a service/binary and connecting to that as
I originally thought I was doing. (As it's more portable)
The 'out of the bo
5.1.0. I believe it's happening with 5.2.0, too, but have not thoroughly
tested.
The problem is that the broker runs out of memory. At the point in time of the
failure, no more messages could be sent anyway because the broker is out of
memory.
So we're less worried about blocking producers a
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Frugia, Kirby A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can reproduce this with the non-embedded, out-of-the-box broker. I also
> think it's an under-the-hood problem.
>
> Until we get a fix, we've set pending message queue limits on our busy
> topics. So, for example, th
2008/12/4 James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2008/12/4 Stephen J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> If I try with camel I receive the following error:
>>
>> Caused by: org.apache.camel.ResolveEndpointFailedException: Failed to
>> resolve endpoint: mqtestserver://TEST.OUTBOUND?targetClient=1 due to: Ther
Hi
I guess I am really misunderstanding the use of the technology then.
If I have a queue called "jbtesting" on a ActiveMQ instance (the only 1 I
have setup anywhere) and my webapp is connecting to localhost and posting
messages into jbtesting, as illustrated by my Spring config files sent in
or
Hi,
the web console is not automatically integrated in your application when
you embed the broker. You need to embed Jetty (or some other servlet
container) as well and deploy web console app
Take a look at the default conf/activemq.xml and webapps/admin folder to
find out how things are done in
I guess this will be a case of "RTFM" for me. ;)
I just was looking at the Web Console that is provided from the default
'getting started' so I didn't really configure anything other than click the
link in the doc.
Pointer to any info to help me understand this would be great. (As is the
ActiveM
I can reproduce this with the non-embedded, out-of-the-box broker. I also
think it's an under-the-hood problem.
Until we get a fix, we've set pending message queue limits on our busy topics.
So, for example, the broker will only queue up 500 messages on a particular
topic per consumer. This
On Sun, 2008-12-07 at 22:59 -0800, prasha8 wrote:
> Have been working on a pilot project to use ActiveMQ as core message provider
> for a legacy system (which is C++ based)
>
> One of the critical requirement is to figure out the best approach to solve
> following problem
> 1. I have ESB convertin
Hi,
I don't see anything wrong with your configuration. You just might
consider adding depend-on for connection factory bean or the follwing
URL vm://localhost?create=false&waitForStart=1 (if you use 5.2.0) to
ensure your broker starts before the connection factory. Take a look at
this link fo
Hi,
I can't see fro you example how you initialize your web console. Are you
sure it points to the right broker?
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Scripting in Java - http://www.scriptingin
Leon,
can you try a recent snapshot[1], I think your issue may be another
variant of https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-2020 which I
fixed last week.
[1]
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/5.3-SNAPSHOT/
2008/12/8 Leon Liu <[EMAIL P
L.S.,
Is it possible to move a message to the DLQ after the TTL has expired? When
using ActiveMQ queues for communicating between applications, it would be
nice to know if a message consumer somewhere has died by attaching a
consumer to the DLQ for 'catching' the errors.
Regards,
Gert
-
I use an embedded broker too and have gone through all the possible
iterations of config options for threading, acknowledgements and message
storage.
Alas, an apparent "memory leak" still persists with slow consumers that
close/die with messages still in-flight/pending. I've had several other
pe
17 matches
Mail list logo
