Re: Why an embedded broker can be unavailable?

2008-11-28 Thread David Borja
Ok ... i'm gonna try this ... Thanx! On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Gary Tully <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > not sure, is there an ordering issue causing two brokers or does the > start property need to be explicitly set: > see the last section of: > http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-ref

Re: Reconciliation after ActiveMQ server crash.

2008-11-28 Thread David Jencks
I looked at the failover docs I could find and I think thabach was asking a different question that AFAICT the failover docs don't discuss... anyway I've wondered about this question :-) : Suppose a client sends a message inside a transaction and either the client or broker crashes before t

Re: Reconciliation after ActiveMQ server crash.

2008-11-28 Thread Rob Davies
This is handled by the ActiveMQ failover transport (the default in 5.1 onwards). It replays messages on your behalf that haven't been acknowledged - there is duplicate detection built in to the broker and the clients too ... cheers, Rob cheers, Rob Rob Davies http://fusesource.com http:

Re: Why an embedded broker can be unavailable?

2008-11-28 Thread Gary Tully
not sure, is there an ordering issue causing two brokers or does the start property need to be explicitly set: see the last section of: http://activemq.apache.org/vm-transport-reference.html 2008/11/28 David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > any ideas?? > > Thanx ... > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM

Reconciliation after ActiveMQ server crash.

2008-11-28 Thread thabach
Hey everyone I have a conceptual question regarding reconciliation after a JMS server crash. According to the JMS specification (paragraph 4.4.13, see below) there is room for some ambiguity leaving a producer in doubt if a message successfully made it to the server or not in case of server failu

Re: Why an embedded broker can be unavailable?

2008-11-28 Thread David Borja
any ideas?? Thanx ... On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 2:42 PM, David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The version of activemq is 4.1.2 ... > > > Thanx. > > > On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 8:24 AM, David Borja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Rob ... >> >> Yes .. the broker is started ... >> >> This is the

ActiveMQ stopped sending messages.

2008-11-28 Thread arcg
I am using Tomcat 5.5 server and Apache-Activemq-5.1.0 to send messages between 2 applications. I have a QueueConsumer implemented which monitors the ActiveMQ and onMessageAvailable() sends the message to the backend application. I had started ActiveMQ some 2 days back and it was working fine. Sud