Re: memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

That's not a a memory leak you're seeing - that's the wacky Retroactive Consumer functionality - see http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html The default policy is FixedSizeSubscrptionRecoveryPolicy - and the default cache size for each topic in 5.1 is about 6mb. I'd suggest conf

id sequence

hi all, I'm using activemq 5.1.0 with jdbc persistence (postgresql). when I send a message a new row is created in activemq_msgs , but id increments by 3 . (4 7 10...) why is it so? thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/id-sequence-tp19912788p19912788.html Sent from t

memory leak problem with ActiveMQ 5.1

I have run across a memory leak that I have been able to reproduce. I am profiling the sample application in NetBeans and I believe that I have traced the problem to org.apache.activemq.openwire.v3.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightUnmarshalByteSequence(DataInput, BooleanStream) The sample program is

ActiveMQ persistence extremely slow with JDBC

Hi, we got a problem when using journal configured with JDBC, here are some details: We configured the journal with an Oracle datasource, but it is *extremely* slow when sending messages to ActiveMQ, about 1.5 minutes per message..., and our config file looks like below: ...

Re: Error in documentation

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Eddie Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to configure some very simple authentication to the web console on > 5.1, and noticed an error in the documentation: > http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html#WebConsole-ExampleconfigurationusingJetty6 >

Error in documentation

Hi, I'm trying to configure some very simple authentication to the web console on 5.1, and noticed an error in the documentation: http://activemq.apache.org/web-console.html#WebConsole-ExampleconfigurationusingJetty6 In the Step 1 example xml snip, it appears to be malformed near the end of th

Re: Null Pointer Exception on broker

Hello, I am running apache-activemq-5.1.0 under Centos 5.2 and having the exact same issue - I was under the assumption (from the posts in this tread) that this was fixedjust reportingThank you! Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp://localhost/127.0.0.1:61616" java.lang.ClassCastE

Re: NMS and network connectivity

Apologies for responding to myself, but I wanted to mention that I did try the 1.1 NMS client with the "wireFormat.MaxInactivityDuration=" connection option, and it did resolve the issues we had with zombie/orphan connections on the broker. -- View this message in context: http://www.nab

Re: NMS and network connectivity

Jim, Thanks for responding. I did try the same test under AMQ 5.2 and 5.3, but the result was the same each time. I will try the 1.1 release with the parameter you suggest and report back. One follow up question: I thought the MaxInactivityDuration was already defaulted to 30 seconds: http://

Re: Unable to download ActiveMQ 5.2

I just added a link to the vote thread in the release page warning. 2008/10/9 James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/10/9 Eddie Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Does anybody know the actual release date/time for AMQ 5.2? I keep seeing >> the "please come back in a few days". If it's not going to

Re: Unable to download ActiveMQ 5.2

2008/10/9 Eddie Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Does anybody know the actual release date/time for AMQ 5.2? I keep seeing > the "please come back in a few days". If it's not going to be released in a > few days, the page should be removed or updated. If you want to know the exact progress of the re

RE: Unable to download ActiveMQ 5.2

Does anybody know the actual release date/time for AMQ 5.2? I keep seeing the "please come back in a few days". If it's not going to be released in a few days, the page should be removed or updated. Thanks Eddie > Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:04:18 -0700> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > use

Re: NMS and network connectivity

Hi, We had a similar problem as well. We called them "zombie connections". I think we solved this by moving to ActiveMQ 5.2. If that doesn't work, you can turn on the timeout inactivity option by setting the "wireFormat.MaxInactivityDuration=" connection option. This option is in the NMS 1.1

Re: A bug or A intent design while useing using consumer.receive()

BTW the default in ActiveMQ from 5.2 onwards is now to use the failover transport - so unless you disable it or change the failover protocol, it will silently reconnect and recover for you without Spring having to do anything http://activemq.apache.org/failover-transport-reference.html 2008/10/9

Problem with spring context and activemq 5.1.0

Hi, I have a problem with configuring amq:connectionFactory in my srping config file. Ive searched google, and found some people who had the same problem, but their solution dont work for me for some reason. Same issue as me http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1638 http://issues.apache.

A bug or A intent design while useing using consumer.receive()

when using consumer.receive() to receive messages from a selected broker, if i shutdown the selected broker . the consumer.receive() didn't throw any Exception . Nevertheless ExceptionListener or TransferListener can catch the disconnected exception , but i thought that the client cons