Re: selecting an open-source JMS implementation

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 2:46 PM, ilango_g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like > WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true? Yes, ActiveMQ implements the JMS 1.1 spec. > Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a s

Re: selecting an open-source JMS implementation

Yes it is. Just start using it. ilango_g wrote: > > Hi > I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like > WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true? > Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a simple JMS > application implementing queues and a recipient

Re: Is Pure Master/Slave Applicable?

Olee wrote: > > Hi, I have tried this, before start activemq, I clean up all the data on > both slave and master, the slave can attached to the master successfully, > but when I run some client program, the async problem often occurs. > > Have you ever use Pure Master/Slave mode? Is it works?

selecting an open-source JMS implementation

Hi I have assumed so far that ActiveMQ is a JMS implementation just like WebSphere MQ. Is that necessarily true? Where I work, I have been assigned the task of implementing a simple JMS application implementing queues and a recipient list. If I need to achieve this, I want to build this using an

NMS and network connectivity

Here's my setup: ActiveMQ 5.1 NMS 1.0 with connection URL: tcp://machinename:61616?jms.prefetchPolicy.all=1 I'm having a problem with AMQ/NMS when the network connection is lost. To simulate this problem I manually disable/enable the network interface on my local box during the course of the tes

Re: zero "Messages Received" for queues in AMQ Web Console

Hello guys, can somebody who have configured network of brokers check in the Web Console (http://:8161/admin/queues.jsp) if it shows zeros in "Messages Received" column, or it matches "Messages Sent" for you? Just let me know. Thanks! Yuriy Gapon wrote: > > We have configured a network of 2 b

Re: Bad Failover Behaviour

I haven't tried the lastest snapshot, but it's not too big of an issue in my case where things are constantly being published. I just couldn't find any mentions of it and was wondering if it was something I was doing wrong. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bad-Failover-Beha

Re: Durable Queue

2008/10/8 Markus Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi, > > how does durable queues work? They persist the message on disk or in a database. > We have a requirement for passing large > messages (size from 10k to 1mb) around using camel. In case of erro

Durable Queue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, how does durable queues work? We have a requirement for passing large messages (size from 10k to 1mb) around using camel. In case of error in the processing the message is put to another queue. We do not want to send the messages multiple times ov

Re: Reverse queue walking

Hi, take a look at the following article http://activemq.apache.org/how-can-i-support-priority-queues.html Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Scripting in Java - http://www.scriptinginjava.