We're using Lingo with Failover transport for some of our calls. I'd assume
that these calls would us the failover transport, so if it fails, the
Failover thread would attempt the reconnect.
However, I keep getting errors like:
javax.jms.JMSException:
edu.emory.mathcs.backport.java.util.concurr
On Thursday 02 October 2008, Joe Fernandez said:
> Are your 'assignments' messages are being sent out as non persistent? If
> so, then that is more than likely your problem.
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-i-not-receive-messages-on-my-durable-topi
>c-subscription.html
They *should* be persi
I'm trying to set up AMQ security using JaaS with a database for users and
passwords.
So far all I have found as an implementation for this is Tagish
(http://free.tagish.net/jaas/doc-1.0.3/index.html) which seems to be a bit
out of date.
Does anyone know of a better solution? Should I just be r
Hi,
I want to connect 3 brokers that are running on 3 different systems
connected to each other using Network Of Brokers(NOB). I did the following
changes in the config
1) Host1
http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core";
brokerName="Host1Broker" dataDirectory="${activemq.base}/data1">
.
Thank you so much, thats fantastic
i did not expect such a speedy responce
thankyou again
thats so cool!
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, harpritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Im very new to all this and will probably ask a stupid question, my
>> ap
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:50 AM, pkimbrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've embedded ActiveMQ 5.1.0 into JBoss 4.2.3. Everything seems to be
> working, but about every 5 minutes, I get a warning on my JBoss sysout
> console:
>
> WARN [BrokerRegistry] Broker localhost not started so using test.br
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:46 AM, harpritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Im very new to all this and will probably ask a stupid question, my
> appologies in advance.
>
> I have a remote location that only supports SMTP and would like to use a JMS
> implementaion to communicate with my remote
2008/10/2 kneumei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding how JMS works, or maybe I didn't explain myself
> very well. How I am viewing JMS's relationship to my code right now is like
> this: My business objects (with their associated queues) are on the server.
> They produce messa
Perhaps I am misunderstanding how JMS works, or maybe I didn't explain myself
very well. How I am viewing JMS's relationship to my code right now is like
this: My business objects (with their associated queues) are on the server.
They produce messages. Consumers (on a client machine) may come
2008/10/2 kneumei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Is there a way to delete the queue programatically from the broker instead of
> using JMX? In my application, there are certain business objects that each
> have an associated queue. When the object is deleted, I need the queue to
> close.
>
> If there is
Is there a way to delete the queue programatically from the broker instead of
using JMX? In my application, there are certain business objects that each
have an associated queue. When the object is deleted, I need the queue to
close.
If there is not a way to do this, I imagine that I am not usin
Are your 'assignments' messages are being sent out as non persistent? If so,
then that is more than likely your problem.
http://activemq.apache.org/why-do-i-not-receive-messages-on-my-durable-topic-subscription.html
Tom Corbin wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Joe Fernandez said:
>> U
I've embedded ActiveMQ 5.1.0 into JBoss 4.2.3. Everything seems to be
working, but about every 5 minutes, I get a warning on my JBoss sysout
console:
WARN [BrokerRegistry] Broker localhost not started so using test.broker1
instead
"test.broker1" is my broker name.
I'm sure I have something mi
On Wednesday 01 October 2008, Joe Fernandez said:
> Use care, if you've assigned the multicast uri to all the brokers' network
> and transport connectors. They'll all end up trying to connect to one
> another. I think what you may want to consider is more of a hub-n-spoke
> topology, where the hub
BTW if you want the queue to disappear when your JMS consumer closes,
use a temporary queue
2008/10/2 James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Each queue uses up resources in the broker unless you use the JMX APIs
> to delete queues from the broker.
>
> 2008/10/2 kneumei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> Hi
Each queue uses up resources in the broker unless you use the JMX APIs
to delete queues from the broker.
2008/10/2 kneumei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
> I am building an application in which I am using ActiveMQ to send messages
> to clients. So far I have something like this. The BrokerService
Regarding the QueueThread: Here is the stack trace for it:
"QueueThread:queue://1" daemon prio=6 tid=0x0adc9c00 nid=0x8a8 waiting on
condition [0x0bc0f000..0x0bc0fc94]
java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x031
Hi
Im very new to all this and will probably ask a stupid question, my
appologies in advance.
I have a remote location that only supports SMTP and would like to use a JMS
implementaion to communicate with my remote applications.
Can ActiveMQ be configured to support this requierment?
FYI the r
Hi,
I am building an application in which I am using ActiveMQ to send messages
to clients. So far I have something like this. The BrokerService and
connectionFactory are created when my application starts up and are put into
a singleton, and the connectionFactory is made available to other parts
Hello,
I would like to know what is the maxPageSize parameter ?
Given the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1585 AMQ-1585
, I set this parameter to a large value to avoid master/slave
synchronization problems and it solved my problem.
I had a second problem with selectors and
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:37 AM, Dejan Bosanac
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are taking this route, you can try defining your broker
> configuration in a separate xml file and do something like
>
> BrokerService broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
> URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
> broker.sta
Hello,
I have a site with ActiveMQ 5.1. After several hours of work with traffic 10
k messages/ hour, windows task manager shows memory usage of java.exe
process about 150 MB. Usually, at this point broker stops to respond to send
requests from jms client. After NT service restart, everything st
2008/10/2 Dejan Bosanac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Cool. Thanks for the info :)
BTW if anyone wants a head start in hacking up an activemq-rest
module, there's a Camel one I've started hacking together (though its
very early days...)
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/activemq/camel/trunk/components/cam
Cool. Thanks for the info :)
--
Dejan Bosanac
http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide
ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Scripting in Java - http://www.scriptinginjava.net
James Strachan wrote:
> Yeah; its way more mature with a much more active communi
2008/10/2 Dejan Bosanac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have this on my wish list for quite some time, but never managed to
> find time to do it :(
>
> I originally looked at other design protocol you've made
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/rest-protocols.html
>
> but this one is much more complete.
>
> Th
I have this on my wish list for quite some time, but never managed to
find time to do it :(
I originally looked at other design protocol you've made
http://activemq.apache.org/rest-protocols.html
but this one is much more complete.
This RESTful protocol you defined for queues could be implement
2008/10/2 Dejan Bosanac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The first time you access some web app (REST servlet in this case), the
> session will be created by the server and a unique id will be associated
> to it. You'll get that info as a jsessionid (usually in a cookie) in a
> response to your request. For
The first time you access some web app (REST servlet in this case), the
session will be created by the server and a unique id will be associated
to it. You'll get that info as a jsessionid (usually in a cookie) in a
response to your request. For subsequent calls you have an option to
pass that sess
If you are taking this route, you can try defining your broker
configuration in a separate xml file and do something like
BrokerService broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
broker.start();
it will be easier to configure it that way.
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
htt
Hi All,
I have done a search across the forums and there doesn't seem to be much
hope, but i thought i would try and ask none the less %-|
Does anyone know anything about configuring ActiveMQ as XA? I am using
Websphere App server and can't for the life of me work out how to set it
up!!
any hel
30 matches
Mail list logo
