Re: JMS the way to go?

James.Strachan wrote: > > > I'd be tempted to hide the middleware from your application code; then > use something like Camel's bean integration to integrate the > 'messaging' into your business logic in a kinda invisible way - then > you don't have to spend a while figuring out how to use the

Messages get stuck temporarily

Hi, We have messages that get submitted to the queue daily. Every so often, these messages get stuck in the queue until another message arrives the next day. It almost seems like the second message "pushes" out the first... Any idea why? Is there some configuration property that's causing t

Trouble with the maven-activemq-perf-plugin

I am interested in using the maven-activemq-perf-plugin for load testing. I am not able to get this to work as described by the wiki: http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html I tried changing the groupId in the activemq-perf pom.xml as suggested in the following th

Re: STOMP remove Durable Subscriber

The issue is definitely still here. I've created issue with test case: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1890 I'll try to nail it down soon. Cheers -- Dejan Bosanac http://www.ttmsolutions.com - get a free ActiveMQ user guide ActiveMQ in Action - http://www.manning.com/snyder/ Sc

Re: How to deal with blocked transport

5.1 Does have better dead connection handling. Please test it out and let us know if you see the improvements. On Sun, Aug 3, 2008 at 9:41 PM, beyond005 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There are some comments about blocked transport in slow consumer topic: > > when using TCP there can be occasions

Re: message group question

On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Mark Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to take advantage of the message group feature in ActiveMQ > 5.1. After reading the page (http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html), > I have a question. > > Is the message group feature for multiple consume

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

I opened issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1889 and have committed a fix. Thanks for the report.. Still looking forward for your test case contribution so that the test suite can catch this error in the future. On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 8:35 AM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

message group question

I would like to take advantage of the message group feature in ActiveMQ 5.1. After reading the page (http://activemq.apache.org/message-groups.html), I have a question. Is the message group feature for multiple consumers on the same queue/topic? What I mean is that in the example, there are cons

Re: Memory leak in broker when subscribing to a topic using TCP connector + noLocal?

I just tried out your attached test case and yeah it looks like a problem. Could you shoot us back an email letting us know that you are willing to contribute the test case to the ASF under the ASL 2.0 license so we can include parts of it in test suite? On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 6:26 PM, Pieper, Aa

Re: activemq-admin failing on snapshot

You might want to capture a stack trace of the broker while it's trying to initialize the jmx connector to get an idea which call is the one that's blocking excessively. Is your DNS resolving name quickly on that machine? Regards, Hiram On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Dylan Vanderhoof <[EMAIL PR

Re: pure master/slave

Yes that is exactly right. The master cannot take over from the slave. On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 2:21 AM, qlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I have the same question on it. When I kills slave broker, I have found that > the master broker is down as well. > AMQ developer, would you please explain it

Re: InterruptedException at connetion.close()

Could you create a JIRA issue for that please: http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 4:11 AM, solmyr72 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a thread that opens up a connection, sends some messages, then closes > the connection: > > class MyThread extends Thre

Re: Journal Problem

What version you using? On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:51 AM, Fuzzo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi all! > The scenario is the following: > - one producer to topic > - two consumer > > Sometimes i get the following error: > > ERROR JournalPersistenceAdapter - Failed to mark the Journal: > org.apa

Re: Debugging a locked state

This is when the client is first forced to issue a request to the broker. Are you sure your broker is up? If you are using failover and the broker is down, it will make this call block. On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:26 AM, sub3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > Occasionally, my system locks up (7

Received expired message: MessageDispatch from ActiveMQMessageConsumer

Hi Currently we're having a time lag of around 40-50 seconds from producer and consumer's system time(both are running onto different systems). After the producer has sent the message object, the consumer gets it immediately but due to system time's delay, it shud be taken as 40+x(time delay for