Re: Message not forwarded unless a consumer was "once active"

kpalania wrote: > > Messages from a broker (say broker A) do not get forwarded to another > broker, broker B (has duplex set to TRUE and the network connector points > to broker A) unless and until I have a consumer that was active atleast > once. If I run a simple java application that dequeue

LDAPAuthoizationMap permissions

Judging from exceptions I'm no longer receiving the plugin is able to authenticate the user and find the topic and queue objects. However it does not see the admin attribute and refuses to let my user create the ActiveMQ.Advisory.Connections topic. I don't see anywhere in the configuration what th

Message not forwarded unless a consumer was "once active"

Messages from a broker (say broker A) do not get forwarded to another broker, broker B (has duplex set to TRUE and the network connector points to broker A) unless and until I have a consumer that was active atleast once. If I run a simple java application that dequeues the messages off of the que

Only memory transaction store with JDBC persistence adapter??

I'm working on setting up ActiveMQ in a JDBC master/slave topology. It will also need to participate in XA transactions. When tracing through the code, I was surprised to see this in the JDBCPersistenceAdapter: private MemoryTransactionStore transactionStore; So when using pure JDBC for mess

Receiver blocking on a queue with many message - persistence issue?

I have a persistent queue backed by kaha (nothing too fancy) with about 80 messages in it. My consumer is batch insert them into a database, receiving mesages one by one and saving them up until reaching a full batch, persisting them, then acknowledging. I've notice sometimes the consumer wi

Re: Trouble configuring attribute for LDAPAuthorizationMap

I am no Spring guru, but it appears to me that MessageFormat is treated as a complex type and thus needs a custom property editor? http://static.springframework.org/spring/docs/2.0.x/reference/validation.html Anyway, I think you can work around the problem as follows http://ac

Re: ActiveMQ 5.1 + 5.2: sending "list" to ActiveMQ.Agent topic causes stacktrace

No problem ... I updated docs and closed the issue Cheers mjustin wrote: Many thanks for your quick reply, it works like a charm! I added a comment with your information to the JIRA report. Best Regards Michael Justin -- Dejan Bosanac http://www.ttmsolutions.com http://www.scriptin

Re: ActiveMQ 5.1 + 5.2: sending "list" to ActiveMQ.Agent topic causes stacktrace

Many thanks for your quick reply, it works like a charm! I added a comment with your information to the JIRA report. Best Regards Michael Justin -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.1-%2B-5.2%3A-sending-%22list%22-to-ActiveMQ.Agent-topic-causes-stacktrace-tp1865

Re: activemq workflows

2008/7/25 AD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hello, > > Is there an easy way to programatically configure a workflow that a message > has to follow through various queues ? for example when a consumer finishes > processing a message there is a rule to send it to the next queue to be > processed? Sure! :)

activemq workflows

Hello, Is there an easy way to programatically configure a workflow that a message has to follow through various queues ? for example when a consumer finishes processing a message there is a rule to send it to the next queue to be processed? Thanks Adam

Is there a feature in ActiveMQ which helps in making Camel throttler to work in clustered environment?

Hi I am trying to implement Camel throttler in a multi clustered environment along with ActiveMQ. I heard that camel is not cluster aware since it is a local throttle. This means that the throttler will apply the throttling limitation on each cluster instead of considering all the clusters as

Re: ActiveMQ 5.1 + 5.2: sending "list" to ActiveMQ.Agent topic causes stacktrace

Hi, you should enable JMX and instruct broker to create a connector in order to make this work. Regards -- Dejan Bosanac http://www.ttmsolutions.com http://www.scriptinginjava.net mjustin wrote: After uncommenting the commandAgent entry in activemq.xml

ActiveMQ 5.1 + 5.2: sending "list" to ActiveMQ.Agent topic causes stacktrace

After uncommenting the commandAgent entry in activemq.xml http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerUrl="vm://localhost"/> sending a 'list' message to the ActiveMQ results in this message: ERROR CommandMessageListener - Failed to process message due to: java.la ng.Exception: ja

Re: ActiveMQ 5.1 has thread leak

Maybe you've found the issue (the slow increase of the number of threads), I saw on 5.1.0 / single broker. I wanted to test that with a simple application, but now I think I've only seen it with our complete app. We're also using a few topics. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.

Re: Help needed. About message loss in distributed queue in network of brokers environment

I will get a chance (hour or so) to look at this later today and see if I can reproduce and/or diagnose. 2008/7/25 Bryan.Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I am deadly waiting for solution or a work around to this problem. > But till now that issue created on JIRA is still open and not assigned. > --

Re: Unable to compile actviemq-cpp-2.2 with VS2003

VC2003 does not support covariant return types, along with other ANSI defined C++ language features and won't work with ActiveMQ-CPP. Regards Tim. On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 20:11 -0700, anju_singh wrote: > Hi, > > Changed the version in 2005 vcproject file (vs2005-activemq.vcproj) to 7.10 > and tri

Re: Memory Usage limit in ActiveMQ 4.1.2 and ActiveMQ 5.1.0

Hi all, Even i am looking forward for the explaination. My initial assumption turned out to be false. I thought setting will limit my publishing of messages once the data file size reaches 1mb (in case of persistent messages and durable subscriber not being active). But what is really hap

Re: Expired messages not moved to dead letter queue.

mlukica wrote: > > Check: > http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1796 > I switched to 5.2-SNAPSHOT, but this didn't help. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Expired-messages-not-moved-to-dead-letter-queue.-tp18608013p18646581.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mai