Re: Setting stomp wire format parameters

I think this may be related to these bugs: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1203 and https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1192 . What Hiram Chirino describes is a dead ringer for my situation... -- copy of Hiram's comments from AMQ-1192 I think this is due

Re: Getting BindException on client side after restart of broker

I'm sorry...Trying again. http://www.nabble.com/file/p17843946/spring-config.xml spring-config.xml http://www.nabble.com/file/p17843946/BindException.txt BindException.txt http://www.nabble.com/file/p17843946/JmsLogMessengerTest.java JmsLogMessengerTest.java rajdavies wrote: > > I couldn't ac

Re: Setting stomp wire format parameters

I checked out AMQ-1739. I think my situation is different. My stomp sockets all show as ESTABLISHED, not CLOSE_WAIT. The interesting thing is that the message producer clients don't show the sockets as existing anymore. I think what may be happening is that an intermediary firewall drops the conne

Strange behaviour when broker ran out of disk space

Hi, I'm encountering a strange behaviour on ActiveMQ 5.1 broker using AMQStore for persistence. In my setup, an ActiveMQCPP (2.1.3) producer with AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE is sending persistent message to a queue, which is being processed slowly on a consumer using VMTransport on same VM as the broker. I d

Re: Examples do not work

A little harsh... Could you provide some more information on the problems you experienced? On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 7:17 PM, grndvl1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To showcase the ActiveMQ possibilities the demos should work. They > don't... > I just got the latest version and wow does the demo

Re: JMS Threading Restriction

Thanks Rob. Josh On 6/14/08, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 14 Jun 2008, at 01:50, Joshua Smith wrote: > > All- >> >> I'm reading a number of references on JMS written some time between 2001 >> and >> now. The challenge that comes with that is knowing which things are still >> tr

Re: persistent messages for durable subscribers are not purged from disc

On 13 Jun 2008, at 16:04, Duro wrote: It looks that there is a problem in activemq journal wich is used by default amqPersistenceAdapter. I have tested this also on amq 4.1.1 journaledJDBC adapter with same bug. When jdbcPersistenceAdapter with 4.1.1(non-journal) or kahaPersistenceAdapter