On 9 Apr 2008, at 23:30, realSri wrote:
Hi,
When do you expect the next release (5.1 or 5.0.1 ?) to come out
(which has
the inactivity monitor fix) ?
If we have 5.0 clients and broker does upgrading broker suffice ?
(assuming
the fix is on the broker side).
Thanks,
- Sri
--
View this m
I have two brokers (call them A and B), where A establishes a connection to B
with the options:
duplex="true" networkTTL="3" dynamicOnly="true"
I have two clients connecting to broker A, and one to B. One of the clients
on A is subscribing to a queue, the other is publishing to it. The client
o
could someone please suggest a way to implement acknowledge which would be
used to get notification about receiving a message.
method signature:
public void acknowledge(ConnectionContext context, MessageAck ack)
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/BrokerFilter.acknowl
Hi,
When do you expect the next release (5.1 or 5.0.1 ?) to come out (which has
the inactivity monitor fix) ?
If we have 5.0 clients and broker does upgrading broker suffice ? (assuming
the fix is on the broker side).
Thanks,
- Sri
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Activem
This is my Spring configuration and I have ActiveMQ integrated with JBoss. I
am able to add messages to the queue but they never seem to get picked up. I
understand that the connection needs to be started. Where should this be
done? And is it possible to make it the default behavior? I tried to st
When i stopped using jms transactions, and started using client
acknowledgements, all these problems went away, and AMQ 5.1-snapshot is now
very stable and working just as expected.
So my personal recommendation - do not use transactions. Use client
acknoledgements instead (acknowledge instead of
i have been working on jmx and have found a way to know wether a message has
been consumed and that would be to invoke the getMessage method on the queue
mbean with the message id.
is there a better, simpler or more efficient way to know the status of a
message?
thanks
--
View this message in c
Ah. Okay, thanks.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Unfortunately you need to set any persistence parameters before adding
> a connector ...
>
>
>
> On 9 Apr 2008, at 00:44, yg_cvg wrote:
>
>>
>> Oddly enough, doing
>>
>> m_broker = BrokerFactory.createBroker("broker:()?
>> persistent=false");
>
Okay, I think I found the problem.
There is a race condition between the time the message is set with the
broker sequence number (RegionBroker.java in send method), and the time it
is actually put in the database (DefaultJDBCAdapter.java in doAddMessage
method).
I have seen that sometimes messa
thx - fix just committed
On 9 Apr 2008, at 15:25, jackrabbit wrote:
FYI: the issue number is AMQ-1651.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wrong-exception-thrown--tp16560154s2354p16586193.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
FYI: the issue number is AMQ-1651.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/wrong-exception-thrown--tp16560154s2354p16586193.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
you can take a look at this article
http://www.nighttale.net/onjava/integrating-activemq-web-console.html
it might help
Cheers
--
Dejan Bosanac
www.scriptinginjava.net
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Dil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have created a broker programatically in java code w
On a 64bit OS install all the system libraries, or at least a large
majority are going to built as 64 bit libraries. So the obvious
question is do you even have 32 bit versions installed to link a 32 bit
ActiveMQ CPP library against? You may want to look at the GNU Libtool
documentation to see wh
I have created a broker programatically in java code with name fred. i.e,
vm:fred producer consumer seem to be working fine, how do i configure
webconsole to observe queues for this broker.
here is some code of broker:
public class ProdConnection {
public static final ActiveMQConnectionFa
See http://activemq.apache.org/how-do-i-use-jms-efficiently.html
On 09/04/2008, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are not using your J2EE providers JMS proxy to cache things; you
> are using vanilla JMS.
>
> So try using the PooledConnectionFactory from ActiveMQ instead.
>
>
>
> O
You are not using your J2EE providers JMS proxy to cache things; you
are using vanilla JMS.
So try using the PooledConnectionFactory from ActiveMQ instead.
On 09/04/2008, paoletto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i wrote the following Stateless Session Bean, and ran in a j2ee application
> on jb
i wrote the following Stateless Session Bean, and ran in a j2ee application
on jbossAS.
With the following implementation i have the problem that, if for example i
put the send in a for
to send 1000 messages (invocations) in a row, after about 200-250 the sender
start to slow down and at
about 30
Noted Dhurba! (High Five dude!!!)
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I ll be highlighting more issues as I 'll be strangling activemq until the
end of this month for production readiness. :-D
Regards
Hatta
Dhruba Bandopadhyay-2 wrote:
>
> Yeah I faced this problem as well.
>
> It was some time ba
Yeah I faced this problem as well.
It was some time back but from what I can remember I believe the
solution was to have two jars available.
1. spring-2.5.3.jar
2. spring-webmvc-2.5.3.jar
The reason is that now, post 2.5, the DispatcherServlet is in the second jar.
This would be preferable to m
19 matches
Mail list logo