Jim Gomes wrote:
I am currently taking a look at this. Part of the solution is to set
a timeout for your transport using a URI parameter like so:
activemq:tcp://amqsrv:61616?transport.requesttimeout=1
Thanks Jim. BTW, is there any place (possibly in the source code) where
all possible U
I am getting JMSExceptions caused by EOFExceptions as shown by the stack
trace below. I don't really know why it is occurring, can't can't reliably
produce the exception, but it does occur frequently. Can anyone point me to
where in my code I should look to correct this problem? Or if it is a
conf
Thanks for the reply.
The url you refered to is applicable to "topics", but for "queues",
retrospective consumers should be able to get all the messages on the queue.
right?
Thanks,
vasant
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-4.1.1%3A-retroactive-consumer-not-gettin
I am currently taking a look at this. Part of the solution is to set
a timeout for your transport using a URI parameter like so:
activemq:tcp://amqsrv:61616?transport.requesttimeout=1
Where requesttimeout is in milliseconds. However, there is a bug with
the timeout, because it will continuo
I don't think he needs to acknowledge. It appears he's using an asynchronous
receiver w/in an AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE session. In this scenario, the
acknowledgment occurs automatically when the onMessage method returns.
Joe
Goto www.ttmsolutions.com for a free ActiveMQ user guide
liushk wrote:
>
Any updates on this issue?
navnetkachroo wrote:
>
> The users.properties, login.config, and groups.properties files are in
> $ACTIVEMQ_HOME/conf/org/apache/activemq/security ... I give this path as
> an argument while (java.security.auth.login.config) starting ActiveMQ.
>
> I tried commenting
Hey gdaswani,
Thanks! That is very helpful information, and saved me hours. I've
since heard the same things about 5.0 from other sources. It's too
bad the ActiveMQ downloads page doesn't recommend a stable release
that is... stable.
Thanks again!
Krishna
On Apr 2, 2008, at 10:00 AM, gd
I don't think that the retroactive consumer feature guarantees delivery of
all messages sent while the consumer was inactive. The way this feature is
described, it is more of a best-attempt effort to deliver the messages.
http://activemq.apache.org/retroactive-consumer.html
Have you considered
Thanks for your response Oleg.
Actually I wanted to get notified on the client side (C#) if the connection
with ActiveMQ is lost because of any reason like the ActiveMQ server is down
or network not available.
I found that if we attach an event handler for ExceptionListener to the
connection ob
We are using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and a retroactive consumer does not receive all
messages.
OS: Windows 2003 Server
Java: 1.5.0_11
In this particular case, we had 403 messages on the queue, we call
receiveNoWait() in a loop and after N messages where N < 403,
receiveNoWiat() returns nothing. The value
Hi
I have tried both with and without connectionTimeout property in the
transport URL
but it does not work, I think there is some firewall issue in the network
Iam using (just a thought)
Thanks
Akhil
tmi wrote:
>
> Does it work when you omit the connectionTimeout property in the transport
> URL?
Does it work when you omit the connectionTimeout property in the transport
URL?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Unable-to-connect-to-remote-broker-tp16467328s2354p16467541.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi all,
Here is the setup and the statistics from a test run.
Tools:-
Spring2.5.2,ApacheActiveMQ4.1.1
Spring config same on both producer and consumers:
It may be tha
Hi everybody,
I´ve been testing activeMQ and it´s pretty nice but I have a doubt: Is the
publish´s performance different using ajax of directly on java?
I made a send and a receive messages application test. When I opened one
receive application in all browsers I have (FF, IE7, Safari 3, IE6) and
Hi,
I have started broker in one machine & try to connect it from listener in
another machine, I am getting following error
In machine where broker is running
[java] 13:52:11 ERROR Could not accept connection : Connection reset by
peer: socket write error
Hi,
I just wondered if there was any more feedback on this as this problem
essentially means I'm not able to make my messages persistent.
Without persistence I've already had cases where an odd message here
and there has gone missing.
Many thanks.
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Dhruba Bandopadh
Dear All,
Bug description:
1. Server listen to advisory messages
2. Client connect ==> advisory messages are sent correctly.
3. Client connection.stop ===> no advisory message :-(
Solution:
3update. Client connection.close & connection.stop
==> advisory messages are sent correctly.
Dear All,
To correlate between client users and actual connections we need to pass
info to the connection.
General Setup:
1. Server is listening on topic.subject1 advisory topic to get
connection/disconnect information.
2. Client user2 connects to broker [server] to consume topic.subject1
messa
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Arjen van der Meijden <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My consumer just consumes a message, processes it and then goes on waiting
> for another one. So if that message happens to be a 'kill'-message, it dies
> (if the message was sent after the consumer started).
>
>
On 3-4-2008 8:50, Joel Poloney wrote:
Is your "kill"-message on every call? Or is that only when you manually
interrupt it? I'm wondering if you changed the Stomp-implementation such
that if you've consumed all of the messages (and it's waiting for a new
message to come through), it automatically
20 matches
Mail list logo
