Hello.
I have a Q with several consumers (C++ consumers).Some of the consumers are
slow, so I like that messages will be consumed from the Q by consumers that
are available and not busy.
The Q is handling a small number of messages and they don't need to be
persistance.
Although I have set the p
Hi there,
I've just started using ActiveMQ, and I am having trouble running it as a
daemon.
I am able to launch it just fine with 'bin/activemq', but when I run
'bin/macosx/activemq start', it appears to be starting, but does not.
I'm running Mac OS 10.4.11.
More details:
typing 'bin/macosx/act
Thanks Rob!!
Moving addConnector() to the last work.
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 27 Mar 2008, at 22:49, sk123 wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to understand ActiveMQ's security feature.
>>
>> I started with simple authentication but seem to be missing
>> something. I
>> have search the
Hi Joe, thank you for your reply. I saw the error message, what I cannot
figure out is why it prints it:
- is it trying to reconnect after being disconnected and failing?
- is it connecting more than once because of wrong configuration?
- how does it decide which client id to use, why?
What I am
The following statement, taken from your standard error output, tells me that
the broker w/the name "ds-pl3.technion.ac.il" is rejecting a connection
request from a client because the client is trying to use a client id
(NC_planetlab1.tmit.bme.hu_inboundds-pl3.technion.ac.il) that is already in
us
Hi,
I tried searching the mailing list archive for an answer but to no avail. So
here's yet another question on networks of brokers. I am using activemq 5.0,
I want to configure a network of brokers with a given topology, that is
deciding which broker is to be connected to which (using multiple n
I noted the leak when running a 5.1 SNAPSHOT against JDK 1.5.0_06-b05 for
Windows XP Pro SP2.
Joe
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 27 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Sachindra Nath wrote:
>
>> This bug is supposed to have been fixed in SUN VM 1.5.0_12.
>> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid
In the code below I'm sending 5000 of these:
static final String MSG = "1"; // 1 character msg
so it shouldn't be a memory issue. The java file of the code below is here:
http://66.17.204.68:8765/~andrew/CommandLinePublisher.java
Thanks,
Andrew
-Original Message-
From
Hi rajdavies,
Thanks for your reply. And I have one more question, is there any way for
queue consumer to ensure message never enter into DLQ regardless what was
set at producer? (or in another word, a "durable" queue consumer)
Thank you.
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 28 Mar 2008, at 06:41, thia
Actually i had set the frequency in import processor of one of this broker
giving that error message to 5mins but when i removed that the error is no
more errors.
When i save my record and by way of debugging the send message method in
TopicExport Processor class is able to send with the generated
Hatta wrote:
>
>
> Hi QWERTY
>
>
> Hi again guys!
>
> Just to let you know - the problem regarding the 36 process are now
> resolved.
>
> My sys admin upgraded the kernel version from 2.4 to 2.6
>
> After doing that, the process are gone and active mq 5.0.0 is stable.
>
> Thanks for all
On 26 Mar 2008, at 21:57, mccraig_ wrote:
i'm getting exceptions from AMQMessageStore, and one of my queues is
stuck
i put 200,000 messages on a queue, and after a couple of hours and
50,000
consumed messages consumers stopped getting any more messages.
restarting
the broker gave me ex
On 27 Mar 2008, at 04:18, Sachindra Nath wrote:
This bug is supposed to have been fixed in SUN VM 1.5.0_12.
http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do;jsessionid=ee6ec97669ab91923bde6c
d8c041?bug_id=6460501
Would we still expect the ActiveMQ5.0 + Sun JDK 1.5.0_12 memory leak?
Possibly - cou
Great! thanks for explaining this to everyone John
cheers,
Rob
On 27 Mar 2008, at 20:42, John F. Lentz wrote:
After looking at the documentation more closely I think I've
answered my own
question, and that this behavior is by design.
"To read the field value, readBytes should be successiv
On 27 Mar 2008, at 22:49, sk123 wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to understand ActiveMQ's security feature.
I started with simple authentication but seem to be missing
something. I
have search the forum as well as Google but no luck.
My test starts the embedded broker and makes a connection. Based
On 28 Mar 2008, at 00:36, mgorkani wrote:
In my test setup i have 3 servers which are using multicast
discovery to find
connections for a network of brokers. Each broker has client
listener for
topic A. If one of the brokers publishes to the topic, all of them
should
get it. Would that b
On 28 Mar 2008, at 06:41, thiamteck wrote:
My college just told me that the message only enter DLQ after consumer
reconnect, if the consumer is same server as the ActiveMQ. Anyway, I
not yet
test it out myself.
This is something we need to add - to actively timeout messages -
currently
On 28 Mar 2008, at 09:26, makr wrote:
As I understand such "synchronous publish" is not available in current
ActiveMQ release but this is a desirable feature?
Does this statement apply to both communication models? publish-
subscribe
(topic) and send-receive (queue)?
Is such feature includ
On 28 Mar 2008, at 09:42, Ramit Arora wrote:
Hi All,
I have a situation where I have to consume persisent messages from
many
non-durable subscribers. My publishers push persistent messages to a
topic,
which are consumed asynchronously by non-durable subscribers. I am
using the
AMQ Persi
On 28 Mar 2008, at 12:45, Garfield071 wrote:
I am brand new on ActvieMQ.
I am wondering how the resolution of the clients IP adress is done
by the
broker. Do I have to assign a URL to each client and define it in a
DNS ?
How the client is wake up when a new message. I know that the clie
inlined:
On 29 Mar 2008, at 00:50, francois1 wrote:
Hi,
My chat application needs to multicast messages to the proper chat
rooms. An
important requirement is that clients must be able to subscribe and
unsubscribe to/from chat rooms. It looks like that it could be done
with
message select
On 29 Mar 2008, at 04:42, sparky2708 wrote:
Since 5.0.0 is basically unusable with all the InactivityMonitor and
EOFExceptions when will a 5.0.x version become available that we can
use?
5.1 Snapshot seems not much better.
Just out of curiosity, how did 5.0.0 come out with so many bugs in
How big are your messages ? - they might be reclaimed if you hit a
memory limit in the broker
On 29 Mar 2008, at 07:22, Andrew M wrote:
My Retroactive Consumer is only receiving the last 789 out of 5000
msgs
sent. Any suggestions?
Thanks.
import javax.jms.Connection;
import javax.jms
On 31 Mar 2008, at 02:01, Oleg Deribas wrote:
Andrew M wrote:
It looks from this page:
http://activemq.apache.org/nms.html
like NMS allows openwire to talk to .NET languages. Are there any
examples
of that?
Here is example: http://activemq.apache.org/nms/nms.html
But it looks like this
24 matches
Mail list logo
