Networks work by brokers acting as consumers on other brokers which
probably explains the unexpected consumer counts?
On 26/02/2008, metaldork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi. i'm preparing to migrate to jms for oracle toplink cache synching and am
> currently doing some configuration and loa
On 26/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My take (which I am going publish articles shortly) is that VTD-XML
> is vastly superior to JAXP in routing/switching XML payloads...
JAXP is just an API for XPath. I don't see why VTD-XML can't implement
that API - it'd make it really easy
Hi,
I have 2 brokers (ActiveMQ 5.0) connected together with this configuration:
dev-amq01 <--> dev-amq02
- dev-amq01:
- dev-amq02:
Communication between both brokers is ok for one or two days, but
eventually, I get on one broker an error:
Async error occurred: javax.jms.Inval
What is the format required to configure the ConnectionFactory and
Destinations(Queues) in LDAP such that my client code can use them.
Sun uses something like:
dn: cn=queueNameBlah,ou=JMSObjects,o=makonetworks.com
objectClass: top
objectClass: javaContainer
objectClass: javaObject
objectClass:
Greetings,
I'm a relative newbie and have a quick question on ActiveMQ performance.
We have a requirement for high volume publishing to a non-durable topic. We're
currently using ActiveMQ and are quite happy with it but are being pushed by
another
team to move to JBoss Messaging. Does any
hi. i'm preparing to migrate to jms for oracle toplink cache synching and am
currently doing some configuration and load testing. my test is:
4 brokers in distributed topic configuration using dynamic discovery
a junit test that starts up 10 threads, each connecting as a consumer using
dynamic
We have had a white paper on VTD-XML from a long time ago
I thought readers of this list may interested
http://www.ximpleware.com/wp_SUN.pdf
- Original Message -
From: "jimmy Zhang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: VTD-XML 2.3
My take (w
My take (which I am going publish articles shortly) is that VTD-XML
is vastly superior to JAXP in routing/switching XML payloads... it is my
understanding
that in the most typical cases VTD-XML will shock the world (outperforming
JAXP by about 10~100x)
We support full XPath expression but again,
I guess VTD-XML is more suitable for the Camel sub project; we could
use it for XML routing and so forth.
http://activemq.apache.org/camel/
Given the fact that VTD-XML appears GPL we'd not be able to host it at
Apache, but we could host it at the camel-extra project...
http://code.google.com/p/cam
On 26/02/2008, jimmy Zhang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, all, I have just recently joined the list and wonder if
> someone can explain to me how FUSE routes XML messages
> in its current implementation... Is it DOM/XPath based or
> is it SAX/PULL based?
For FUSE related questions you should
Hi,
We're setting up 2 embedded brokers that are networked for redundancy.
Using Active MQ 5.1 snapshot, we're able to send messages to a queue and
have them processed. It's a low volume queue ( ~50 messages per day ) with
long running jobs ( 1 hr each job ). With 25 remote consumers, the jobs
Hi, all, I have just recently joined the list and wonder if
someone can explain to me how FUSE routes XML messages
in its current implementation... Is it DOM/XPath based or
is it SAX/PULL based? What is the performance number etc?
I appreciate any suggestions on this...
thanks,
Jimmy Zhang
I'm getting a class initialization error when I try to launch an applet using
ActiveMQ 5.0.0. The applet is basically a variant of the provided examples,
and they work within the eclipse applet viewer so I know the basic code is
sound.
The error is:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not ini
It's a good point. I can't think of an application that would do it on
purpose. A bug in the producer might be the only scenario where it could
cause problems.
I was just running some tests while preparing to upgrade to AMQ5 and wanted
to be clear on this.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Ben Ch
Certainly, but if order matters, wouldn't you expect to get all or none
of your messages that depend upon each other? Why would you send x as
non-persistent and x+1 as persistent if x+1 requires x to be processed?
Roger Hoover wrote:
There are applications in which message order matters and yo
There are applications in which message order matters and you generally
wouldn't expect message properties to affect the order of delivery unless
you're using a selector.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Ben Chobot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why wouldn't you want it to be this way?
>
> Roger Ho
Why wouldn't you want it to be this way?
Roger Hoover wrote:
Using STOMP on AMQ 5, if I enqueue some persistent and non-persistent
messages and then consume them, they don't get consumed in the order in
which they were produced. The non-persistent messages are delivered first
(with their relati
Hi Rob,
Is this the same thing as the Total Ordering feature (c.f.,
http://activemq.apache.org/total-ordering.html), or is it something
different? While it may be expected behavior, it was a little surprising to
read that was what would happen.
Best,
Jim
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Rob Da
Hi Johann,
It can take a little bit to figure out STOMPConnect, but once you have it
configured, it's very low maintenance. I had to do something very similar
to what you are attempting to do. I needed to be able to connect to TIBCO
EMS using the Apache NMS client (this was before direct support
BTW StompConnect is not a connection factory - is a Java bean that
uses a ConnectionFactory and has a start() method that must be called.
So we're talking about running this Java code...
StompConnect connector = new StompConnect(connectionFactory);
connector.start();
Feel free to wrap it up as a
On 26/02/2008, Johann Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that's exactly where I lose coherence. I'm not going to be writing any
> Java code here, so want to do it all via config.
Unfortunately right now you have to write Java code. There's no JBoss
specific configuration yet for StompConnec
And that's exactly where I lose coherence. I'm not going to be writing any Java
code here, so want to do it all via config. I created a datasource config for
JBOSS as follows:
StompConnect
tcp://localhost:61616
stomp/connect
And get a funky exception. However, I
Just create a StomConnect object, configure it with whatever
ConnectionFactory you want from JBoss and call its start() method.
Use whatever JBoss mechanisms you want (EJB/MBeans/spring) to configure that
e.g. here's the JavaDoc
http://stomp.codehaus.org/maven/apidocs/org/codehaus/stomp/jms/Stomp
Indeed... ;)
My problem is the documentation seems a little light, or I don't have enough of
a frame of reference to make sense of it.
Below the documentation from Stomp:
If you use some kind of dependency injection framework like Spring you can
configure StompConnect using XML if you prefer. J
On 26/02/2008, Johann Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> See http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=128884 for the
> response from JBOSS.
So basically they are passing the buck :)
--
James
---
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
Open Source Integration
http://o
Hi James,
See http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=128884 for the
response from JBOSS.
Regards,
j/
-Original Message-
From: James Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 February 2008 11:13
To: users@activemq.apache.org
Subject: Re: JBoss Messaging Stomp Configur
On 26/02/2008, Johann Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Unfortunately the choice of messaging platform is not in my control, so I
> have to go with one of the STOMP integration methods. I guess first prize
> will be StompConnect, but I'm struggling a little to make out head or tai
Hi Rob,
Unfortunately the choice of messaging platform is not in my control, so I have
to go with one of the STOMP integration methods. I guess first prize will be
StompConnect, but I'm struggling a little to make out head or tail of the
process.
I saw an article on ActiveMQ integration and tr
On 26 Feb 2008, at 06:49, Roger Hoover wrote:
Using STOMP on AMQ 5, if I enqueue some persistent and non-persistent
messages and then consume them, they don't get consumed in the order
in
which they were produced. The non-persistent messages are delivered
first
(with their relative order p
On 25 Feb 2008, at 21:06, Johann Ungerer wrote:
Hi All,
I'm totally new to the entire JMS environment, but am trying to
connect a .NET Client to a JBOSS Messaging implementation. Thus far
I've tried with the NMS client, using an OpenWire connector, but I
figure this will never work.
It
30 matches
Mail list logo
