Re: disabling InactivityMonitor ( maxInactivityDuration = 0 ) disables failover

Hi, thanks for prompt reply. We can not upgrade easyl, because we use amq 4.1.1 in production :( is it true, that failover protocol depends on InactivityMonitor? regards, fatih rajdavies wrote: > > > > yolcuabbas wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> we use activemq 4.1.1 and have following problem. the

Re: Network of Brokers - Broker A talking to Broker B

On Feb 15, 2008 2:12 PM, wha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm using the latest snapshot 5.1 > > I'm having some problems with a really simple setup. I want broker A to send > its messages to Broker B. > Broker A has a producer and Broker B has a consumer. > > Here's my config for broker A

Re: Regarding Store and Forward: Network of Brokers

On Feb 18, 2008 1:08 PM, wha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How did you make it work ? > > I've been trying forever to make my brokerA talk to my BrokerB > > I have the following setup: > > Consumer -> BrokerB <--> BrokerA <- Producer > > My messages get stuck on Broker A, even though network con

Re: Network of Brokers - Broker A talking to Broker B

Okay, I figured out some things since my last post. But I'm still unable to make messages pass from Broker A to Broker B. I have the following activemq.xml: So, I have a producer publishing messages to brokerA and then I'm trying to forward thos

Messages not received after amq 5.0

We upgraded to active-mq 5.0.0 and realized our messages are not been received (delivered from broker) when all the modules are not in the same host. In other words, if we send a message to localhost it is received and delivered ok, otherwise it never reaches the client but in our broker appear

Re: Regarding Store and Forward: Network of Brokers

How did you make it work ? I've been trying forever to make my brokerA talk to my BrokerB I have the following setup: Consumer -> BrokerB <--> BrokerA <- Producer My messages get stuck on Broker A, even though network connection between BrokerA and BrokerB has been established. I have set dyn

Re: Issue with Windows Binary Zip - Won't open

Zanderfax wrote: > > I have been trying to download the windows binary zip file from several of > the mirrors and the backup site. When the download finishes, the zip will > not open. > > Is anyone else having this issue? > Very odd - which version were you trying to download ? -- View thi

Re: Help With Virtual Topic

sub3 wrote: > > Hi, > I can't seem to get the VirtualTopic working correctly. I have 1 producer > & 2 consumers. However, each message only ends up getting to 1 of the > receivers. Can someone tell me if I am setting these up correctly: > > Producer: > Destination myQueue = session.createTo

Re: disabling InactivityMonitor ( maxInactivityDuration = 0 ) disables failover

yolcuabbas wrote: > > Hi, > > we use activemq 4.1.1 and have following problem. the uri is > failover://(tcp://:xxx?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0). > > If I put the value of maxInactivityDuration to 0 and try to stop the > connection over jconsole, my client dont try to reconnect to

Re: redeliveryCounter not updated correctly using ActiveMQ 5.0.0

Sven Panko wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am having a problem with redelivery of messages after transaction > rollback. I am using XA in combination with Springs > DefaultMessageListenerContainer and have a simple test case in which the > MessageListener throws an IllegalStateException which trigger

disabling InactivityMonitor ( maxInactivityDuration = 0 ) disables failover

Hi, we use activemq 4.1.1 and have following problem. the uri is failover://(tcp://:xxx?wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=0). If I put the value of maxInactivityDuration to 0 and try to stop the connection over jconsole, my client dont try to reconnect to broker. is the failover protocol depe