On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:41 AM, TBuckel wrote:
Hi all,
I am having trouble setting up a *stable* ActiveMQ Pure Master/Slave
topology.
Initially I have tried v4.1.1 which failed with an exception. I
found an AMQ
JIRA ticket which said that Pure/Master slave didn't work in v4.1.1.
Ok, so I
On Feb 14, 2008, at 12:05 AM, davewolfs wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am hoping that some of you could provide me with some realistic
numbers on
the maximum number of Durable Topic subscribers.
I have never worked with Active MQ so I am not familiar with it's
limits.
In a production environm
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 4:17 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I mean the transportConnector Address..NeverMind I am clear in this but
>> comming to our networkConnector
>>
>> In broker1 the network Connector will have the
>>
>> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)"
>>
>>
Hi all,
I am having trouble setting up a *stable* ActiveMQ Pure Master/Slave
topology.
Initially I have tried v4.1.1 which failed with an exception. I found an AMQ
JIRA ticket which said that Pure/Master slave didn't work in v4.1.1.
Ok, so I switched to AMQ 5.0.0, created 2 configs (master/sl
On Feb 13, 2008 4:17 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I mean the transportConnector Address..NeverMind I am clear in this but
> comming to our networkConnector
>
> In broker1 the network Connector will have the
>
> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)"
>
> In broker2 the network Connector
Hello everyone,
I am hoping that some of you could provide me with some realistic numbers on
the maximum number of Durable Topic subscribers.
I have never worked with Active MQ so I am not familiar with it's limits.
In a production environment what are some realistic numbers for the maximum
dur
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 3:34 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Here is the uri
>>
>> I am using 2 different IP addresses
>>
>> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.1:61616,tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)"
>>
>> tcp://10.0.0.1:61616 -- Broker1
>> tcp://10.0.0.2:62626 -- Broker 2
>
> OK, two
On Feb 13, 2008 3:34 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is the uri
>
> I am using 2 different IP addresses
>
> uri = "static:(tcp://10.0.0.1:61616,tcp://10.0.0.2:62626)"
>
> tcp://10.0.0.1:61616 -- Broker1
> tcp://10.0.0.2:62626 -- Broker 2
OK, two things:
1) You don't want broker1 p
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 3:09 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanqs for the info..
>> I configured the broker1 networkConnector as shown below
>>
>> > networkTTL = "2"
>> uri="broker1,broker2 addresses" />
>>
>>
>>
On Feb 13, 2008 3:09 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanqs for the info..
> I configured the broker1 networkConnector as shown below
>
> networkTTL = "2"
> uri="broker1,broker2 addresses" />
>
>
> when I am listening to broker1 and
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 2:30 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Thanqs alot for the quick response. Actually I am new to ActiveMQ I was
>> not
>> aware of the ttl config can you tell where exactly in the activemq.xml do
>> I
>> need to do what I shud do (Ex: 6 brokers in th
Mike.Gingell wrote:
>
> I have embedded amq in TomCat 6 - seems like there are no problems (yet)
>
Can you tell me how you did that? I can't seem to find a step by step
guide.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-5.0-Web-console-deployment-tp11446923s2354p1546873
On Feb 13, 2008 2:30 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanqs alot for the quick response. Actually I am new to ActiveMQ I was not
> aware of the ttl config can you tell where exactly in the activemq.xml do I
> need to do what I shud do (Ex: 6 brokers in the network)
The networkTTL option
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008 12:22 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> HI
>>
>> Config:
>>
>> Amq - 5.0
>> OS - Linux
>>
>>
>> I configured the network of brokers by creating multiple instances of the
>> amq. I have a question like if I produce a message to the one of the
>> brok
On Feb 13, 2008 12:22 PM, GeekPro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> HI
>
> Config:
>
> Amq - 5.0
> OS - Linux
>
>
> I configured the network of brokers by creating multiple instances of the
> amq. I have a question like if I produce a message to the one of the broker
> in the network lets say broker1
HI
Config:
Amq - 5.0
OS - Linux
I configured the network of brokers by creating multiple instances of the
amq. I have a question like if I produce a message to the one of the broker
in the network lets say broker1 using failover protocol does the message
gets forwarded to the remaining brokers
Actually the database error was caused by the producer code. Can anybody
point me out what is wrong with this one?
I don't use failover transport and i am closing both the session and
producer.
If i dont use createSession(true, Session.TRANSACTED) I run oout of db
connections in 40 messages which
Hi Stéphane,
I'll be running some tests this week-end or next week. My setup will be 2
brokers communicating accross the network. On one side I'll be retrieving
from a database and the other I'll be storing. I'll be testing several
scenarios like network communication problems, heavy messages, et
Sorry I messed up the title on a previous post. Anyway...
Try as I might I just can not get the xml configuration to start an embedded
activemq broker.
Please can someone help turn my hack into a couple of short lines of xml.
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.0.0, Spring 2.5, JDK 1.6, Apache Tomcat/6.0.14
In
Try as I might I just can not get the xml configuration to start an embedded
activemq broker.
Please can someone help turn my hack into a couple of short lines of xml.
I'm using ActiveMQ 5.0.0, Spring 2.5, JDK 1.6, Apache Tomcat/6.0.14
In the war\WEB-INF\sitemanager-servlet.xml
The code for QB
Thanks for the info. I got it working.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Start-Stop-Consumer-and-duplicate-message-is-received.-tp15423159s2354p15461022.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi All,
I am quite new to ActiveMQ and experimenting with the persistency providers.
I am using an ActiveMQ 5.1 SNAPHOT of about ten days old.
I have set up the jdbc persistency without journalling on PostgreSQL 8.1.x
I notice some strrange behaviour:
1: I see never any acknowledgements coming
On 13/02/2008, Jeroen van Bergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> wha wrote:
> >
> > I can't see your entire code.
> > I don't know if you have a setMessageListener(YourConsumerClass) for your
> > consumer.
> > Your consumer class must implement MessageListener.
> >
>
> What I gathered from the J
Can you attach a test case for this ?
On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:54 AM, Jeroen van Bergen wrote:
wha wrote:
I can't see your entire code.
I don't know if you have a setMessageListener(YourConsumerClass)
for your
consumer.
Your consumer class must implement MessageListener.
What I gathered
24 matches
Mail list logo
