Re: Is there a time-frame for a 5.1 release

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:51 PM, Jason Rosenberg wrote: Just wondering if there's a guideline time-frame for a 5.1 release. I'm wanting to upgrade to 5.1, but management is leary of upgrading to a snapshot version, for obvious reasons! Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble

Re: StoreUsage, TempUsage and MemoryUsage

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
On Jan 31, 2008, at 7:26 PM, dalin wrote: rajdavies wrote: Store usage controls the maximum size of the AMQMessage Store TempUsage is the maximum size of the store used for non-persistent messages that may optionally overflow from memory awaiting dispatch MemoryUsage is the maximum amount o

Re: FailoverTransport in 5.1 seems to make more noise...

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
On Jan 31, 2008, at 6:31 PM, Jason Rosenberg wrote: All, I've been testing with AMQ 5.1-SNAPSHOT, using the FailoverTransport. I'm using TcpTransport as the underyling transport. I've noticed that is seems to report more on the logging level, items that might have previously been reported

Re: StoreUsage, TempUsage and MemoryUsage

2008-01-31 Thread Tamir
I'm sorry, but I still don't understand the meaning of each setting. Doe the StoreUsage affect the size of disk space the AMQStore would consume? Cause that's not what I've seen in my tests (of course, there's always the possibility I didn't use it right). Is there any documentation about those se

Re: Activemq integration

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
On Feb 1, 2008, at 5:20 AM, activebud wrote: Marco Buss thanks for the reply , yes messages are persistence and i can verify it with activemq admin .but activemq server defaults display as persistance false , i could not find nay place to make the server defaults to pesistance true in ac

Re: Activemq integration

2008-01-31 Thread activebud
Marco Buss thanks for the reply , yes messages are persistence and i can verify it with activemq admin .but activemq server defaults display as persistance false , i could not find nay place to make the server defaults to pesistance true in activemq.xml file. it display as follows Configure

Exception : factory:java.io.IOException

2008-01-31 Thread JS75
Dear All: Now I need to implement two requirements with MQ4.1. 1. Start my embedded broker with cofig.xml file. 2. Use MS SQL Server instead of default derby. And here is my activeMQ.xml (I put it in C disk) http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans"; xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1

noclassdeffound problem with activemq-rar-5.0.0 in glassfish

2008-01-31 Thread long cao
hi, we are trying to deploy activemq-rar-5.0.0 within our sjas server. we are encountering a noclassdeffounderror: org/apache/commons/logging/LogFactory. does any have clues or suggestions at how to resolve this? the log4j jar as well as commons logging jar are packaged within the rar file itse

Is there a time-frame for a 5.1 release

2008-01-31 Thread Jason Rosenberg
Just wondering if there's a guideline time-frame for a 5.1 release. I'm wanting to upgrade to 5.1, but management is leary of upgrading to a snapshot version, for obvious reasons! Jason -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-a-time-frame-for-a-5.1-release-tp15213331s23

Re: StoreUsage, TempUsage and MemoryUsage

2008-01-31 Thread dalin
rajdavies wrote: > > Store usage controls the maximum size of the AMQMessage Store > TempUsage is the maximum size of the store used for non-persistent > messages that may optionally overflow from memory awaiting dispatch > MemoryUsage is the maximum amount of memory the broker will use > > c

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

2008-01-31 Thread ttmdev
Eric, Move to the latest 5.1.1 SNAPSHOT. I think your 'duplex' configuration will work much better with that SNAPSHOT. Joe Eric-AWL wrote: > > You were right ttmdev. > In a half-duplex configuration, it works ! > > Like you tell it to me, I had to add "sleep" temporisation after > connect

Re: "Embedded broker", "network of brokers" and "temporary queues"

2008-01-31 Thread Eric-AWL
You were right ttmdev. In a half-duplex configuration, it works ! Like you tell it to me, I had to add "sleep" temporisation after connection start, and before some releases of resources. Thank you very very much Eric-AWL ttmdev wrote: > > Any chance you can post the source for your test clie

FailoverTransport in 5.1 seems to make more noise...

2008-01-31 Thread Jason Rosenberg
All, I've been testing with AMQ 5.1-SNAPSHOT, using the FailoverTransport. I'm using TcpTransport as the underyling transport. I've noticed that is seems to report more on the logging level, items that might have previously been reported with [DEBUG] are now [INFO] or [WARN]. This is causing s

Re: StoreUsage, TempUsage and MemoryUsage

2008-01-31 Thread Rob Davies
On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:36 PM, Tamir wrote: I'm trying to figure out the effect of those settings on the AMQPersistenceAdapter (through the SystemUsage object). I'm working with an embedded broker. So far I was unable to find it, and couldn't find anything in the docs as well. Anyone know

Should it be ok to use 4.1.1 on client side, with 5.1 broker?

2008-01-31 Thread Jason Rosenberg
Hello, I've been able to upgrade successfully so far to activemq 5.1-SNAPSHOT. However, I am seeing some issues with the client-side, primarily in the logging output coming from the FailoverTransport (another issue, another post) Anyway, in the mean-time, I'm wondering if it is a valid conf

StoreUsage, TempUsage and MemoryUsage

2008-01-31 Thread Tamir
I'm trying to figure out the effect of those settings on the AMQPersistenceAdapter (through the SystemUsage object). I'm working with an embedded broker. So far I was unable to find it, and couldn't find anything in the docs as well. Anyone knows what those objects control ? -- View this message

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

2008-01-31 Thread Eric-AWL
Hi ! I just finished a test with one fixed queue for the answer from the server, instead of using temporary queues. On the client, for every message the client want to send, I associate a JMSCorrelationID, and I create one consumer on this fixed queue with a selector on this CorrelationID. The s

Re: Is ActiveMQ the right tool?

2008-01-31 Thread Dejan Bosanac
Hi Maarten > > I'm running a cluster of webservers and I'd like to write certain events > > (logins, logouts, etc.) to a central log. To do that, I'd like the > > webservers to send event messages to a broker. A logging machine should > > periodically fetch, process, aggregate and write those eve

Re: Is ActiveMQ the right tool?

2008-01-31 Thread Arjen van der Meijden
On 31-1-2008 14:04 Maarten Manders wrote: I'm running a cluster of webservers and I'd like to write certain events (logins, logouts, etc.) to a central log. To do that, I'd like the webservers to send event messages to a broker. A logging machine should periodically fetch, process, aggregate and

Is ActiveMQ the right tool?

2008-01-31 Thread Maarten Manders
Hello, I'm relatively new to ActiveMQ and MOM in general and I'd like to find out if I'm using ActiveMQ for the right job - and I have some newbie questions. :-) I'm running a cluster of webservers and I'd like to write certain events (logins, logouts, etc.) to a central log. To do that, I'd lik

Re: ActiveMQ topology question (Store and Forward)

2008-01-31 Thread Tamir
Worked like a charm. Now I have a follow up question ... I'm looking for some documentation about some advanced configuration (at least I think it's advanced :-) ) : * I want to limit the length of the queue (to limit it's memory usage). I want everything to be persisted to disk, but only to hol

Re: Prefetch Limit of 1000 .... without acknowledges

2008-01-31 Thread Eric-AWL
Hi! I'm french so excuse me for my english mistakes. Now I am in 5.0.0, the release version. My two servers are Linux servers. You will find a lot of informations about the problem and tar files of my configuration in the thread named "Embedded brokers" "network of brokers" "temporary queues".