which version of ActiveMQ?
On 30/01/2008, Eric-AWL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Context
>
> A "client" process is on "ytsvmx01s" server, Server process is on
> "ytsvmx02s" server (an other server). A duplex network of brokers is made by
> the client configuration.
>
>
I guess you could walk through the active & archive journal files to
analyse message flows. Though this will include all messages on all
destinations so Rob's idea might be easier to do.
On 31/01/2008, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:56 PM, brian12 wrote:
>
> >
>
That problem has been fixed - take the latest snapshot release
On Jan 30, 2008, at 3:18 PM, marcus olsson wrote:
I also did that on the ActiveMQ server-side, but this resulted in
"too many
files" problem, since ActiveMQ never closed down any connections.
ttmdev wrote:
I started getting
On Jan 30, 2008, at 12:56 PM, brian12 wrote:
I have a need to log all messages to all topics that pass through a
particular broker for offline analysis. I can write a client that
subscribes to all the topics, and dumps the data to disk. However,
I'd
rather use something that's built-in to
On Jan 30, 2008, at 11:20 AM, Eric-AWL wrote:
Hi
Context
A "client" process is on "ytsvmx01s" server, Server process is on
"ytsvmx02s" server (an other server). A duplex network of brokers is
made by
the client configuration.
An embedded VM client process, with 100 threads.
- each
On 31/01/2008, at 3:54 PM, David Lloyd wrote:
Paul,
Paul Smith wrote:
On 31/01/2008, at 2:37 PM, QWERTY? wrote:
Hi,
We're currently using Hibernate and ActiveMQ, but i want to
suppress all the
activeMQ messages comming through log4j
is there an easy way to do this? I can only get it d
Paul,
Paul Smith wrote:
On 31/01/2008, at 2:37 PM, QWERTY? wrote:
Hi,
We're currently using Hibernate and ActiveMQ, but i want to suppress
all the
activeMQ messages comming through log4j
is there an easy way to do this? I can only get it down to debug
messages so
far using
log4j.logg
On 31/01/2008, at 2:37 PM, QWERTY? wrote:
Hi,
We're currently using Hibernate and ActiveMQ, but i want to suppress
all the
activeMQ messages comming through log4j
is there an easy way to do this? I can only get it down to debug
messages so
far using
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq=de
Hi,
We're currently using Hibernate and ActiveMQ, but i want to suppress all the
activeMQ messages comming through log4j
is there an easy way to do this? I can only get it down to debug messages so
far using
log4j.logger.org.apache.activemq=debug
Cheers,
--
View this message in context:
htt
I am using ActiveMQ version 5.0.0 . I create a stomp producer and add
messages to a queue (does not matter if the messages are added as persistent
or not, same behavior). I create a consumer to read from that queue. Once
the consumer begins to read, the producer is slowed down drastically ( from
activebud schrieb:
Hi All,
I am using activemq 5 , mysql 5.0.37 and
mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-bin.jar
my activemq.xml as follows
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schem
On 1/30/08, gustav.mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I assume you only want to ACK a message once the consumer/worker thread has
> processed it? I have also been wondering what the best pattern is for that.
> I was also wondering if the correct way to proceed is to create a listener
> for each w
I also did that on the ActiveMQ server-side, but this resulted in "too many
files" problem, since ActiveMQ never closed down any connections.
ttmdev wrote:
>
> I started getting the inactivity exceptions when I switched to the latest
> 5.0 and addressed them by setting wireFormat.maxInactivity
With a forwarding bridge in-place between a remote collector and the central
server, a queue that is created on the collector will not automatically be
reflected/created on the server. You either have to define a queue in the
server broker's cfg file or have clients, which are connected to the se
I assume you only want to ACK a message once the consumer/worker thread has
processed it? I have also been wondering what the best pattern is for that.
I was also wondering if the correct way to proceed is to create a listener
for each worker thread? And if a listener thread is busy, with the requ
I have a need to log all messages to all topics that pass through a
particular broker for offline analysis. I can write a client that
subscribes to all the topics, and dumps the data to disk. However, I'd
rather use something that's built-in to ActiveMQ if it's available. I was
looking at the A
I'm not sure what are you trying to achieve, but if you need to group
messages in one queue, you can use selectors
(http://activemq.apache.org/selectors.html). You have an example of
how to use them in test cases. Another option would be to send
messages to different queues.
On Jan 30, 2008 1:19 P
Hi All,
I am using activemq 5 , mysql 5.0.37 and
mysql-connector-java-3.1.12-bin.jar
my activemq.xml as follows
http://www.springframework.org/schema/beans";
xmlns:amq="http://activemq.org/config/1.0";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www
Yes, sorry for not RTFM, it's not very logical though, to ACK all
messages when you ack one.
So what are my options then? Stomp protocol doesn't seem to support sessions:
"The session-id header is a unique identifier for this session (though
it isn't actually used yet).
"
Should I create separate
I guess I responded instinctively without thinking it through. This is
definitely a correct behavior.
Cheers
On Jan 30, 2008 9:39 AM, gustav.mauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am under the impression this is correct behaviour. See for example:
> http://java.sun.com/products/jms/tutorial/ pag
Hi
Context
A "client" process is on "ytsvmx01s" server, Server process is on
"ytsvmx02s" server (an other server). A duplex network of brokers is made by
the client configuration.
An embedded VM client process, with 100 threads.
- each thread create a temporary queue
- each thread send
I'm new to ActiveMQ, so bear with me ...
I want to use ActiveMQ in the following scenario, and haven't find a way to
configure it the way I want it.
I have a lot of remove JVM (let's call them collectors) that send data to
one central JVM (server).
For scalability and availability reasons, I wan
I am under the impression this is correct behaviour. See for example:
http://java.sun.com/products/jms/tutorial/ page 63
Sebastjan Trepca wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ(both versions are affected) with STOMP protocol and
> noticed a problem with it. At least I hope it's a problem.
>
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
