Hi,
I notice that inside the Geronimo project (under the spec folder) in the SVN
repo there is JMS 1.1 spec source code, is it safe to say that this is the
source for th JMS 1.1 spec that is AcitveMQ 4.1.1 depends upon ?
Cheers
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JMS-Spec-1
Marco,
Thank you for the response. Are there limitations on how long a session can
stay open and the number of messages it can handle? If I use the 2nd example
in our application, the session may stay open for a few weeks.
Best,
-- Thomas
Marco Buss wrote:
>
> You only need one session for y
tpamsler schrieb:
Hello,
I am trying to figure out if I need to create a new session for every
message that I produce and or consume?
For example do I need to do the following to send two messages:
// Sending MSG1
session1 = connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
messagePro
I am in the process of converting from Orion JMS to ActiveMQ. In Orion we
only use Text Messages. We set a few message properties with names that
have a period in them such as test.message=Test. In Orion we could set the
selector to test.message='Test'. In ActiveMQ this throws an invalid
selec
Hello,
I am trying to figure out if I need to create a new session for every
message that I produce and or consume?
For example do I need to do the following to send two messages:
// Sending MSG1
session1 = connection.createSession(false, Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE);
messageProducer1 = session1.c
Thanks. I think writing a simple STOMP client would be the best way.
Unfortunately we're currently using ObjectMessages. Do we have to convert
the messaging to TextMessages? Does ActiveMQ convert ObjectMessages
automatically to TextMessages?
Kind regards
Juergen
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> activ