looks like you are creating transacted sessions and not calling commit
- is that you mean to do ?
On Jan 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Olivier Bigard wrote:
Hello,
We had the same problem with ActiveMQ 5.0.0.
Yesterday we downloaded the last 5.1 SNAPSHOT and the message
disappeared,
but ActiveMQ i
It looks like you've hit flow control - you might want to disable it -
see here: http://activemq.apache.org/producer-flow-control.html
cheers,
Rob
On Jan 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, Olivier Bigard wrote:
Hello,
We had the same problem with ActiveMQ 5.0.0.
Yesterday we downloaded the last 5.1 SNA
Hello,
We had the same problem with ActiveMQ 5.0.0.
Yesterday we downloaded the last 5.1 SNAPSHOT and the message disappeared,
but ActiveMQ is still frozen after some messages...
I put a message in the forum with our Java code.
We are running ActiveMQ on Solaris platform with JDK 1.5.0_07.
Can a
I'm trying to setup ActiveMQ 5 as a windows service. The service is created
successfully but immediately shuts down after being started. Has anyone
successfully got ActiveMQ5 installed as a windows service? The following is
the contents from my wrapper.log file with the debug option set to 'true'
Hi Jean,
A MessageListener should only be set if you are using an asynchronous
consumer, you will need to comment out
"subscriber.setMessageListener(ml);" in your code if you're going to be
using a synchronous consumer (ie. consumer.receive) which looks to be
the case in your sample code. afa
I find it weird too. The configuration of the database are the same for both.
I have tried replacing the default mysql connector with the one provided by
data direct. But the same problem occured but now with additional warning:
Database driver NOT recognized
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 07/01
Dear All:
I tried to receive message from topic, however, I got exception below.
[java] [java] javax.jms.IllegalStateException: Cannot
synchronously receive a message when a MessageListener is set
[java] [java] at
org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQSession.checkMessageListener
What is the best way to determine (to the extent that this makes sense) a
message's position in a queue?
Assuming messages represents a long running tasks and so the queue is
depleted at a rather slow pace and the messages are removed from the queue
in the same order as they are added, I would l
On Jan 17, 2008 12:35 PM, DavidShaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am looking to embed an ActiveMQ JMS queue into an existing application we
> have developed. Is the developer forum for people developing ActiveMQ
> itself or for people writing software that utilizes ActiveMQ?
The user mailing l
You are correct: the dev list is for activemq development. You're
probably better off using the users list. No penalty though if you
get them mixed up :).
Thanks for using ActiveMQ,
Hadrian
On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:35 PM, DavidShaw wrote:
I am looking to embed an ActiveMQ JMS queue into a
I am looking to embed an ActiveMQ JMS queue into an existing application we
have developed. Is the developer forum for people developing ActiveMQ
itself or for people writing software that utilizes ActiveMQ?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/User-vs-Developer-forums--tp1493
Thanks for the reply, but I dont think thats our issue. We are still on 4.1.1
and dont use persistent messaging at all.
Thanks for the input though...
dmarks wrote:
>
> "Has anyone seen this before or know why it might be happening?"
>
> We have seen this happenand think it may be related
"Has anyone seen this before or know why it might be happening?"
We have seen this happenand think it may be related to persisted
messages generated from 4.1.1 having problems once 5.0.0 was brought up.
Simply clearing out the datastore (we didn't need to save those messages)
fixed our proble
On 17/01/2008, jvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> James.Strachan wrote:
> >
> > On 17/01/2008, jvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> pplive wrote:
> >> >
> >> > BrokerService service=BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
> >> > URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
> >> > servi
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 17/01/2008, jvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> pplive wrote:
>> >
>> > BrokerService service=BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
>> > URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
>> > service.setMessageAuthorizationPolicy(new
>> > MyMessageAuthorizationPol
On 17/01/2008, jvr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> pplive wrote:
> >
> > BrokerService service=BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
> > URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
> > service.setMessageAuthorizationPolicy(new
> > MyMessageAuthorizationPolicy());
> >
> > am I worong ??
> >
>
Hello,
ok, attaching the source code file does apparently not work here.
So here are the relevant code parts from the producer and processor classes,
which create the connections to ActiveMQ and the messages.
Sorry for the trouble...
Regards,
Jürgen Schumacher
Procucer.java
Hello,
I am currently doing some stress tests with ActiveMQ 5. I have searched the
mailing list archive for similar reports, but they always seemed to resolve
to something like "it's fixed in the latest snapshot", which definitely did
not help in my case.
My test setup is as follows:
- 1 comp
On 21/08/2007, pplive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BrokerService service=BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
> URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
> service.setMessageAuthorizationPolicy(new
> MyMessageAuthorizationPolicy());
>
> am I worong ??
That looks right to me.
--
Jam
19 matches
Mail list logo
