Re: NullPointerException with RA on Glassfish

2008-01-06 Thread Rob Davies
please discuss it on the list kai On Jan 6, 2008, at 9:26 PM, khudalla wrote: Hi, Chris, James! I have put some time into this issue and already have commented on it in JIRA. I think I have found the problem and already have hacked up a solution which I would like to elaborate on. However

Re: Stomp to REST missing message body using examples

2008-01-06 Thread Archie Cowan
I'm a little closer now... After reading that the message type is toggled on whether or not the content-length header is included, http://activemq.apache.org/stomp.html, I dug in to the stomp gem and found that it is hard coded to always send the content-length header. def _transmit(s, comman

Re: NullPointerException with RA on Glassfish

2008-01-06 Thread khudalla
Hi, Chris, James! I have put some time into this issue and already have commented on it in JIRA. I think I have found the problem and already have hacked up a solution which I would like to elaborate on. However, James, in JIRA the issue is not assigned to anyone and I would like to discuss some

Stomp to REST missing message body using examples

2008-01-06 Thread Archie Cowan
Hello, Using the latest AMQ 5.0.0 release and the ruby stomp-1.0.5 gem, I'm trying to send some messages via the example catstomp.rb script and receive the messages using the example javascript from http://activemq.apache.org/ajax.html. However, it doesn't appear that the message body is making it

Re: ActiveMQ 5 and Log4j JMSAppender error

2008-01-06 Thread TOPPER_HARLEY
I dont think so, I doubt youll get much help there.does it ALWAYS happen or just sometimes? The reason I mention that is that we have gotten this exception before with a spring based JMS listeners trying to connect to a TCP AMQ broker URL and both were AMQ 4.1.1 out of the box. However, it was

Re: more topics against more filters - overhead estmation

2008-01-06 Thread Rob Davies
I'll assume all the clients are active at the same time - and that you don't require durable subscribers. In which case there will be the destination itself - which is a relatively small object and queued messages for each subscriber to a destination. The trade of is one of performance agains

more topics against more filters - overhead estmation

2008-01-06 Thread breezee
Hi, I am planning a system which will involve one broker and many clients (about 40) that will use it. calculating the usage, i will have to hold about 700 topics per client, total of 28000. That seems pretty large . I am considering making some topics shared for different usages, using message f