If you experience problems - the best thing to do is to raise a
support issues (jira) , with a junit test case (hopefully one class -
look at the src for examples) asap
Provide details about your environment, the version of AMQ you are
running and any config information as well.
cheers,
Ro
and i set static queues in
.
the situation is the same. receive action like a register action although
excluedDestinations is set.
sigh... how can i make sure of this? just use JMS TO JMS method to solve the
problem? JMS TO JMS solution have some reconnecting problem so why i use
networkCon
and i found another interesting thing.
both AMQs i don't set a static queue.
so i use cilent to send messages to queue TEST.FOO1 on 'TOP' AMQ.
if i use client to receive from one of the other AMQ once named FOO1, the
next time all messages will forward to this FOO1.
if i receive the same queue on
i set 3 networkConnector to connect another 3 AMQ in my XML. this AMQ named
'TOP'.
in each of the networkConnector i set the same excludedDistinations queue
named TEST.FOO, in order to receive messages if other 3 AMQ have the
messages in that queue TEST.FOO.
i use client connect to 'TOP' AMQ to s
I watch this thread with interest because I also have issues with activemq
and have not found any solution (using released version 5.0). I kind of lost
hope right now with using activemq.
I use Stomp for publisher and consumer. There are about 30 producers and 40
consumers each using their own co
it really seems like if the project depends on a snapshot, the apache
snapshot repository should be in the pom
as a workaround you can add it to your pom (or settings.xml or
whatever) but it would be nice if this wasn't necessary
apache-snaps
apache snapshot repo
Waiting for stuff to sync to disk is always gonna be slow btw. More
details here on tuning (e.g. parallelise, using many producers and
consumers or use transactions and batching)
http://open.iona.com/wiki/display/ProdInfo/FUSE+Message+Broker+Performance+Tuning+Guide
On 21/12/2007, EricMeena <[EM
Thanks RajDevies,
I also used the default value (32mb) as you suggested, still this didn't
help me.
Do you think there are some other properties to combine with the syncOnWrite
to make performance acceptable??
Thank you.
rajdavies wrote:
>
> Although syncOnWrite will be slow - I think the siz
I have an ActiveMQ 4.1.1 broker and client. Sometimes a client hangs in the
middle of the wireformat negotiation, and does not recognize that it is
stuck. This does not happen all the time, but once we did have about 10% of
800 clients freeze overnight. Client logs:
2007-12-13 01:08:16,917 DEB
jianxiac wrote:
>
> Dear all,
> I set up the REST/AJAX examples following the instruction:
>
> http://activemq.apache.org/web-samples.html
>
> and ran the simple HTTP GET / POST via regular web browser technology
> (hyperlinks and HTML forms), by posting messages with the html form:
>
i solved my project with AMQ, but the problem is still there without my
project.
in my project i have 3 AMQs. one is the TOP, another two are children of the
TOP.and two children do NOT have communication.so i just connect the TOP to
two children, and two children connect to TOP without two childr
Please keep try the latest 5.0-SNAPSHOT - as we are working our way
through any issues you find
On Dec 21, 2007, at 11:17 AM, John Smith wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone have the perfect combination of ActiveMQ release that
has been
working for a longer period of time with large (>=10MB) and durabl
Hi,
Does anyone have the perfect combination of ActiveMQ release that has been
working for a longer period of time with large (>=10MB) and durable
messages?
We have tried various combinations of AMQ4.0, 4.1.1 and 5.0 with the default
old file storage, MySQL, Derby and Kaha, but we have not been l
Hi,
What is the perfect combination of ActiveMQ release that has been working
for you for a longer period of time with large (>=10MB) and durable
messages?
We have tried various combinations of AMQ4.0, 4.1.1 and 5.0 with the default
old file storage, MySQL, Derby and Kaha, but we have not been l
Hi,
We have been hit with this exception on our sending of messages:
Exception in thread "ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:29406"
java.lang.NegativeArraySizeException
at
org.apache.activemq.openwire.v2.BaseDataStreamMarshaller.tightUnmarshalByteSequence(BaseDataStreamM
arshaller.java:
Awesome Michael!!
On Dec 21, 2007, at 8:41 AM, mjustin wrote:
About BTActiveMQClient
BTActiveMQClient is a component for Delphi(tm) and Free Pascal which
provides easy access to the Apache ActiveMQ messaging system. With
BTActiveMQClient, applications can connect to Apache ActiveMQ servers,
s
Hi,
OK, that does sound reasonable, but if that is the case, then how can you
distinguish between just wait time and actual CPU time in the profiler
output?
Hiram Chirino wrote:
>
> Hi I don't think your interpreting the profiler correctly.
>
> It is expected that most of the time that threa
About BTActiveMQClient
BTActiveMQClient is a component for Delphi(tm) and Free Pascal which
provides easy access to the Apache ActiveMQ messaging system. With
BTActiveMQClient, applications can connect to Apache ActiveMQ servers,
subscribe to queues and topics, send and receive messages and objec
18 matches
Mail list logo