Which one is the one that fails the C# side or the C++ side. And if
you reverse the consumer / producer role is it still the same?
On Dec 14, 2007 4:50 PM, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> thats my thought also. however C# to C# work C++ to c++ works but C# to C++
> wont. Seems very odd.
thats my thought also. however C# to C# work C++ to c++ works but C# to C++
wont. Seems very odd.
nmittler wrote:
>
> Hey Rob,
> Agreed - this certainly smells of a flow control issue!
>
> The tricky bit is that two C++ clients can talk to each other without
> issue, whereas C#<->C++ doesn'
Could you post a link the the binary that has the issue?
On Dec 6, 2007 4:54 PM, Jeremy Ross <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The 4.1.1 Windows build seems to be missing the bin/activemq.bat. I started
> ActiveMQ using 'java -jar run.jar', which seems to be working, somewhat.
> Should I be
What amq version jdk and os? Also is it the client or the broker that
gets the OOM?
On Dec 7, 2007 12:19 PM, Alan Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All,
>
> We are using ActiveMQ v5, and have found an interesting situation with
> our sending process.
>
> We have just confirmed, that if we t
perhaps a different jndi.properties is being found on the classpath
before the AcitveMQ one.
On Dec 10, 2007 3:55 AM, manish_mk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can anybody please reply.
>
> Regards,
> Manish
>
>
> manish_mk wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I am trying to integrated ActiveMQ with C
The broker will create the log files and periodically checkpoint
status to them even if no messages are being written to them.
Furthermore, sending non-persistent messages to an HA broker does not
make much sense because the only messages that are HA, and get
recovered on failure, are the persiste
Hi in ActiveMQ 5.0.0 we startup a couple of clients by default and
don't configure them with any credentials. So I think that those
clients are the one creating those problems.
If you removed the and and
sections which are all optional (and new) features.. then I think it
should work again.
Use the REST support that activemq provides. See:
http://activemq.apache.org/rest.html
On Dec 10, 2007 11:21 AM, Rob Bowley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using activeMq internally on tcp but have an application which needs to
> subscribe sitting in on the other side of a firewall whi
it can easily be done if the embedded broker is embedded or if your
using the peer transport to implicitly create the embedded broker.
See:
http://activemq.apache.org/peer-transport-reference.html
On Dec 10, 2007 5:49 PM, xbranko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is it possible, and if so how, to con
Looks like we should start the embedded broker async to avoid hanging
the Jboss startup.
I created issue: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1519
to track.
On Nov 12, 2007 12:07 PM, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/11/2007, ikbenben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > h
Hi yes.. exclusive with priorities should work! They were designed
for that. But I warn you that all 3 features used in combination has
not been highly tested. Please try it out and let us know your
results. If you develop any junit tests to confirm the expected
behavior please contribute those
please post a stack trace and or a junit test showing the problem.
On Dec 12, 2007 8:46 PM, Boris Mazniker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I experienced the exact same problem in 5.0. Everything worked fine for 4.1.
> In 5.0, when vm transport is initializing, it goes through authorization and
> fa
you might also want to ask on the tomcat lists.
On Dec 13, 2007 5:37 AM, JoC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have some problems setting up ActiveMQ with a standalone Tomcat.
>
> I have created a minimal web app with a Spring MDP that works great if I use
> Eclipse with WTP. Clean tomcat, clean ec
As a work around you can try:
tcp://localhost:61616?transport.socket.keepAlive=true
On Dec 13, 2007 6:30 AM, Carlos Quiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm using ActiveMQ 5 (Taken from svn using the activemq_5 tag) and I was
> thinking to see how to setup that all my connections use the
You never need to add the vm transport:
broker.addConnector("vm://localhost:61616");
it gets created/destroyed on the fly. Also make sure the all the
brokers have unique broker names. And all the steps you are doing are
done automatically using the peer transport [1]. Like:
new ActiveMQConnect
What amq, jvm, os versions were ya using?
On Dec 13, 2007 9:13 AM, bill richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,all
> i encountered one exception,which is listed below.I canot figure out why.
> help me,its urgent.
>
> WARN 2007-12-13 17:56:39,172 ActiveMQConnection:onAsyncException - Async
> ex
What's a bindings file??
On Dec 13, 2007 12:09 PM, Ramki_kkd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Has anyone configured a message bridge with ActiveMQ and WLS 10?
> I don't know how to create bindings file at ActiveMQ side. Any help would be
> highly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
> RK
> --
> Vi
It just the focus of alot of the developers for the last few months
have been on AMQ 5. It's easier for most of us developers/volunteers
to help out on that version rather than having to load up the old
version.
On Dec 14, 2007 3:32 AM, Martin Grotzke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I shouldn't
You using AMQ 5.0.0 ??
On Dec 14, 2007 6:23 AM, Dave Song <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,there
>
> I have a question when using JDBC Master/Slave. Some of the messages that
> have sent to queue are not consumed by messageListener
>
>
> I used ActiveMQ with spring. It worked perfect with one bro
You could have also found this info in the FAQ:
http://activemq.apache.org/my-producer-blocks.html
On Dec 14, 2007 12:59 PM, Hiram Chirino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In ActiveMQ 4, all in transit messages are held in memory. If you
> have a slow consumer, to avoid exausting the JVM memory and
In ActiveMQ 4, all in transit messages are held in memory. If you
have a slow consumer, to avoid exausting the JVM memory and getting an
out of memory error, ActiveMQ has a configurable limit of how many in
transit messages it will hold. Once it is reached, producers will be
slowed down / blocke
The general anwser is no. ActiveMQ has only traditionally maintained
wire protocol compatibility between clients and brokers in the same
major release. But the wire protocol in ActiveMQ 4 introduced
versioning which allows the possibility to support backward
compatibility. Testing has shown that
Perhaps there is an error in you Mule configuration or perhaps Mule
has a bug. If you submit a test cases using the pure JMS client
showing an error we could help with that easier.
Regards,
Hiram
On Dec 14, 2007 9:47 AM, krv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Community,
>
> No one replied to this
Hi Please let use know the version being used along with the platform
info jdk/os and versions. Perhaps this is happening consistently on
some OSes/jdks.
On Dec 14, 2007 10:44 AM, LizNJ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We have an application that uses activemq to send data from one server to
> anot
Yes it should.
On Dec 14, 2007 12:10 PM, mrh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've been testing a program using AMQ 4.1.1 and just noticed that 5.0.0 is
> now out... when was it released, and will CMS work with it?
>
> Thanks,
> mrh
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-5
Correction: will ActiveMQ-CPP work with it?
Thanks,
mrh
mrh wrote:
>
> I've been testing a program using AMQ 4.1.1 and just noticed that 5.0.0 is
> now out... when was it released, and will CMS work with it?
>
> Thanks,
> mrh
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-5.
I've been testing a program using AMQ 4.1.1 and just noticed that 5.0.0 is
now out... when was it released, and will CMS work with it?
Thanks,
mrh
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-5.0CMS-tp14339691s2354p14339691.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archi
I've added another page to the wiki concerning version numbers for packaging:
The page ActiveMQ-CPP product version number has been created to specify
the way version numbers are used in the project, with some examples.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AMQCPP/ActiveMQ-CPP+product+ver
Mani.. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As per the instructions given in "Getting Start with ActiveMQ.."
> I am trying to run ActiveMQ but unfortunately it doesn't start and throws
> exception continuously like..
>
> INFO NetworkConnector - Establishing network connection
> between from vm://lo
We have an application that uses activemq to send data from one server to
another. It works just fine, but during the night no data is sent. If we do
not restart all the servers in the AM before messages are sent we get
errors. The errors don't seem to be consistant.
At first we got an error comp
Hi Community,
No one replied to this thread since two days :,(. I am really stuck here.
Someone puleez comment on this.
Vivek
krv wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am facing a problem using http connector in 5.0.0. I have written a
> simple sender and receiver components to a queue. Here is what
Hello,
is it possible to have inter broker communication between ActiveMQ of
different
major number releases?
I tried between 3.2.2 and 4.1.1 but I got:
javax.jms.JMSException: start failed: Read timed out at the 3.2.2 and
java.io.IOException: Wire format negociation timeout: peer did not send his
in what kinds of situation,producer's send() will block?
when AMQ's cache is full?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/in-what-kinds-of-situation%2Cproducer%27s-send%28%29-will-block--tp14334387s2354p14334387.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.co
Hi,there
I have a question when using JDBC Master/Slave. Some of the messages that
have sent to queue are not consumed by messageListener
I used ActiveMQ with spring. It worked perfect with one broker. the beans
configuration is like:
Ok, I shouldn't have asked if we should move to AMQ 5 ;)
So there is no problem with our code/configuration/setup?
But thinking about AMQ 5 - why do you recommend this? Is AMQ 4.1.1 in
general not stable / good enough, or, in other words, is AMQ 5 so much
better?
And what would we have to change
35 matches
Mail list logo
