Hi,
I'm wondering if C# client for Active MQ supports SSL. If it doesn't, are
there any plans on adding the support in the near future?
Thanks,
Boris.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/C--client-support-for-SSL-tp14308272s2354p14308272.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User m
I experienced the exact same problem in 5.0. Everything worked fine for 4.1.
In 5.0, when vm transport is initializing, it goes through authorization and
fails since there is no correct username/password.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Trouble-with-JAAS---5.0.0-tp142509
This is good news. Please let me know if there is anything I can do.
I would love to retest this once it has been marked as resolved.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 12/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Well my first impression was wrong also. I was assuming it was an issue
On 12/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well my first impression was wrong also. I was assuming it was an issue with
> C++ and the broker. However after extensive testing I am sure it is a
> problem with interop with C# and C++. I would hope you dont run into this
> issue.
>
> I d
Well my first impression was wrong also. I was assuming it was an issue with
C++ and the broker. However after extensive testing I am sure it is a
problem with interop with C# and C++. I would hope you dont run into this
issue.
I did get to testing C# to C# and I let it run full speed for over
Ah, I see. That's different from the impression I was initially getting from
your post. In particular, our clients would be Java servlets, so we might
not run into these issues. I am in the process of making some stress tests
myself right now.
Hellweek wrote:
>
> Here is what I can say.
>
>
Hi All.
I've got a problem that I'm not sure if I can solve in AMQ (I'm using
4.1.1).
I would like to have listeners active on overlapping queue wildcards. For
example, listener 1 listens to FOO.* and listener 2 listens to *.BAR.
This should be all well and good until I get the message FOO.BAR
Steffen Ewert wrote:
Thanks Daniel!
I think my problem is the missing @ResourceAdapter annotation. But, do you
know in which jar I can find the org.jboss.annotation.ejb.ResourceAdapter
annotation? I work on JBoss 4.2.2GA and i can't find the package
"org.jboss.annotation" anywhere ... :-( Mu
It appears that it does not support C++ and is not as mature as ActiveMQ.
Hellweek wrote:
>
> I will examine this option today. Thanks for the heads up.
>
> Jonathan Share wrote:
>>
>> Hellweek wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I t
bump :)
ikbenben wrote:
>
> Hey James,
>
> thanks for the feedback. i had read the docs.
>
> just to be sure i am understanding correctly, suppose we have 2 jboss
> nodes in a cluster, both with activemq-ra.rar and jbossweb-tomcat55.sar
> deployed. then, when the 1st node is started, both
Daniel Pocock wrote:
How did each product fair?
1. Tibco EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance
tests.
2. MSMQ don't even get me started with this POS.
3. SONIC EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance
tests.
4. ActiveMQ can not make it past any stress
Hello,
I have the same problem: Using JBoss 4.2.2 + ActiveMQ 4.1.1.
I follow these steps:
+ I create a slim context based on the copy of the default context ->
./bin/run.sh -c slim ok
+ Then i remove jms (JBossMQ) from the deploy directory to be sure to not
use it -> ok
+ Then i copy the Active
Do you have multiple jms jars on the classpath?
On 12/12/2007, Rudi23 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to use ActiveMq with Spring as it is described on the homepage.
>
> So in my beans.xml i put this:
>
> class="org.apache.activemq.pool.PooledConnectionFactory
Might not have answered that question very well for you.
We plan on using a mixed API enviroment.
For many of the exchanges we deal with we have to talk via C++ as most
exchanges do not support C#.
However once we are past the exchanges we plan on using C# as the primary
language. As such we o
Here is what I can say.
With the exception of the issue that I have posted about here I can tell you
that I am very happy with the performance of ActiveMQ.
As our applications depend on some for of MOM all of our applications use a
common MessagingLayer. As such it took very little time for us
Thanks Daniel!
I think my problem is the missing @ResourceAdapter annotation. But, do you
know in which jar I can find the org.jboss.annotation.ejb.ResourceAdapter
annotation? I work on JBoss 4.2.2GA and i can't find the package
"org.jboss.annotation" anywhere ... :-( Must I install a additionaly
The Test programs I provideded will demonstrate the issue. To be fair and
honest the issue seems to be an issue with using the C# API and C++ API.
Get the three test programs and you will see the the issue very clear.
Roger Hoover wrote:
>
> Can anyone confirm or deny the second issue menti
I had no real need for a JAVA API as such it was not included in our
evaluation.
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2007, Hellweek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I pulled the 5.0 down yesterday. As well as the 5.0 RC1, RC2, RC3
>
> Cool thanks. BTW in your previous mail detailing your issues
Thanks,
I was not sure where I should open the JIRA issue. Will follow this issue
and retest once resolved.
nmittler wrote:
>
> Appreciate your feedback and helping to identify this problem! I've
> captured this in a JIRA issue here:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP-157
I will examine this option today. Thanks for the heads up.
Jonathan Share wrote:
>
> Hellweek wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I know what I am about to post will upset a few people, however I think
>> it
>> is important that I document my experience with ActiveMQ in the hopes
>> that
>> others like
Hello,
I'm trying to use ActiveMq with Spring as it is described on the homepage.
So in my beans.xml i put this:
tcp://192.168.70.201:61616
Hi,
I am using ACTIVE MQ 4.1.1. While running a MDB application with XA
transaction I am getting the following warning message.
17:12:21,577 WARN [ServerSessionImpl:10] Local transaction had not
been commited. Commiting now.
My application is running fine. But I am worried if this will have an
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 7/21/07, Chris Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Let alone the message that was in the queue. (Even if persistant
>> delivery)
>> is selected... So without setting up a CLUSTER of ActiveMQ servers. How
>> do
>> I get the JMS server to maintain the state of the
How did each product fair?
1. Tibco EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance
tests.
2. MSMQ don't even get me started with this POS.
3. SONIC EMS no issues with any of the stress tests and performance
tests.
4. ActiveMQ can not make it past any stress tests. See issues be
24 matches
Mail list logo
