Hi folks. I'm a bit of a newbie to activemq. I've been trying both the
4.1.1 and 5.0 snapshot (20071120.092745). I was wondering if the method for
specifying persistant/durable topic publishing or subscribing has changed in
5.0.
I have the following test perl code using Net::Stomp
#publis
On 26/11/2007, Jason Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm curious whether you've found a solution to this. I've seen also that if
> you use the maxReconnectAttempts, and it fails to reconnect, then the
> connection cannot be reliably recovered.
If a connection fails to reconnect it must b
On 27/11/2007, Bas Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 14-nov-2007, at 11:39, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set.
>
> Clear as a bell, nice, just what the doctor ordered.
>
> Just to be safe, I'll stick with amq ;)
Great choice! :
>
> Just pop the resequencer in between the producer and consumer queue;
> then you can finely control how the priority ordering works etc. e.g.
> you can use complex expressions/rules for sorting things etc. Such as
> using JMSPriority first, then by some other header.
>
> In Camel...
>
> fr
On 14-nov-2007, at 11:39, James Strachan wrote:
Compliant JMS providers should preserve the JMSCorrelationID you set.
Clear as a bell, nice, just what the doctor ordered.
Just to be safe, I'll stick with amq ;)
Thanks,
bas.
--
bas a schulte - http://
www.connecte
I created an issue for this in the ActiveMQ JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQ-1503
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Out-of-memory-error-with-durable-subscribers-tf4487985s2354.html#a13959856
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
I'm curious whether you've found a solution to this. I've seen also that if
you use the maxReconnectAttempts, and it fails to reconnect, then the
connection cannot be reliably recovered.
I've tried it with the Jencks AMQPool for my connection pooling, as well as
the standard ActiveMQ PooledConne
Timothy Bish wrote:
There is not anyone working on this. We don't currently have Debian
machines so its not really feasible for us to do this. I would love
to find someone who would work on adding the ability to build rpm,
debs and solaris pkg files etc. I just don't have time to devote to
Do you happen to have more than one element in your xml cfg file?
Koka wrote:
>
> Why is the broker starting itself again? Below is what I see after I start
> up ActiveMQ
>
> ACTIVEMQ_HOME: /home/wchung/apache-activemq-4.1.1
> ACTIVEMQ_BASE: /home/wchung/apache-activemq-4.1.1
> Loading messag
It could be a dependency issue in your spring.xml
http://activemq.apache.org/the-vm-transport-starts-a-broker-before-my-configured-broker-starts.html
On 26/11/2007, Koka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why is the broker starting itself again? Below is what I see after I start up
> ActiveMQ
>
> ACTI
Why is the broker starting itself again? Below is what I see after I start up
ActiveMQ
ACTIVEMQ_HOME: /home/wchung/apache-activemq-4.1.1
ACTIVEMQ_BASE: /home/wchung/apache-activemq-4.1.1
Loading message broker from: xbean:Static_Matt.xml
INFO BrokerService - ActiveMQ 4.1.1 JMS M
The INFO and WARN messages below are telling me that you already have a
broker running on the machine with the same configuration. That other broker
has the default message store locked and is currently bound to the JMX port
of 1099.
INFO faultPersistenceAdapterFactory - Journal is locked...
There is not anyone working on this. We don't currently have Debian
machines so its not really feasible for us to do this. I would love to
find someone who would work on adding the ability to build rpm, debs and
solaris pkg files etc. I just don't have time to devote to that. It
would be go
Is anyone working on official Debian packages of ActiveMQ CMS and CPP?
It would be very convenient to have these available - if it is not already
happening, I am happy to contribute some effort towards this.
Regards,
Daniel
yes they do.
http://activemq.org/config/1.0";>
http://activemq.org/config/1.0";>
http://activemq.org/config/1.0";>
rajdavies wrote:
>
> does every broker have a different broker name?
>
> On Nov 23, 2007, at 7:57 PM, Koka wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm trying to set up a static network of
On 26/11/2007, Viswanath Durbha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here is the spring xml that I used to configure MQQueueConnectionFactory with
> credentials. The following worked for me.
>
>
>class="org.apache.camel.component.jms.JmsComponent">
>
>
>
>class="org.springframework.jms.co
Here is the spring xml that I used to configure MQQueueConnectionFactory with
credentials. The following worked for me.
This works for me.
Thanks,
Viswanath
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 23/11/2007, Viswanath Durbha <[EMAIL PROTEC
17 matches
Mail list logo
