Re: The matching wildcard is strict error with AMQ 5 (was Re: AMQ 4.1 and Spring XML beans)

Hello all I've been getting a few queries about this issue from various people off-list, so I thought I'd reply here with some useful ideas for future generations struggling with this issue. My advice: If I remember correctly, you should check your Spring XML, the ActiveMQ schema and the sc

Re: Messages does not show up in database

Are you using the high performance disk journal? On 21/11/2007, Erlend Aakre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I changed the persistenceAdapter to JDBC and a mysql database and user has been set up (tables has been automatically generated). But when I add messages to the queue nothing is saved in

Re: Messages does not show up in database

What does your producer code look like? On 21/11/2007, Erlend Aakre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I changed the persistenceAdapter to JDBC and a mysql database and user has > been set up (tables has been automatically generated). But when I add > messages to the queue nothing is saved in the data

Messages does not show up in database

I changed the persistenceAdapter to JDBC and a mysql database and user has been set up (tables has been automatically generated). But when I add messages to the queue nothing is saved in the database. The messages can be retrieved OK from the queue, but are not saved when added, or when activemq

Re: VirtualTopic and persistency problem

James, I use the following to create the destinations when starting the broker: public void startBroker() throws Exception { BrokerService broker = new BrokerService(); ActiveMQQueue d1 = (ActiveMQQueue) ActiveMQDestination.createDestination("Consumer.module1.VirtualTopic.mytopic", Activ

Re: VirtualTopic and persistency problem

BTW are you positive that the consumer queues are actually created in each of the test cases you're doing? i.e. when you start/stop the broker are they created up front before you send any messages? If not you might wanna use this... http://activemq.apache.org/configure-startup-destinations.html

VirtualTopic and persistency problem

I have a problem with VirtualTopics and persistency. Consider the following setup: I have a producer which produces messages to virtualtopic: VirtualTopic.mytopic I have a manager with an embedded broker and two statically defined queues: Consumer.module1.VirtualTopic.mytopic and Consumer.module

Re: Problem changing from "AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE" to "SESSION_TRANSACTED"

I registered on JIRA and submitetd AMQCPP-155 Nate... nmittler wrote: > > Hi John, > That sounds like the correct use case. Even if it wasn't, it > shouldn't core dump :) > > Would you mind capturing this in a JIRA issue > (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP > ) and attachin

(AMQ-CPP) Client excepction when sending (a lot of) messages

I'm having problems with my client application, not beeing able to send/receive messages (queue blocked) after a certain amount of messages have been send (DeliveryMode::PERSISTENT, Session::CLIENT_ACKNOWLEDGE - all messages get acknowledged upon receiving). Also, there seems to be problems with m

Re: Problem changing from "AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE" to "SESSION_TRANSACTED"

Hi John, That sounds like the correct use case. Even if it wasn't, it shouldn't core dump :) Would you mind capturing this in a JIRA issue (http://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/AMQCPP ) and attaching a sample that causes the problem? Thanks, Nate On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:52 AM, JohnOldma

Problem changing from "AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE" to "SESSION_TRANSACTED"

Hi Using: CMS 2.1.1 ActiveMQ 4.1.1 SUSE 10.2 Based on the sample code, have set up a simple client/server queue, using createSession with AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE. Messages appear to work as expected. However, I want to eventually end up with a failover setup, with two servers, and therefore need to l

Re: how can I configure persistence adapter in URI?

On 21/11/2007, bbray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The BrokerService is exactly what I was looking for. I initially had trouble > with it, but I realized looking at your example that I was mistakenly > calling addConnector() before I called setPersistanceAdapter(). When I > swapped them around i

Re: High Availability and Load Balancing

The reason for master/slave is to avoid catastrophic hardware failure loosing messages. i.e. if you loose an active broker's hardware machine (its disk or its data centre entirely) you've lost the messages - with Master/Slave the slave is kept in sync so has all of the messages the master had to av

Re: how can I configure persistence adapter in URI?

The BrokerService is exactly what I was looking for. I initially had trouble with it, but I realized looking at your example that I was mistakenly calling addConnector() before I called setPersistanceAdapter(). When I swapped them around it worked great! Thanks, Brian rajdavies wrote: > > >