James Strachan wrote:
On 16/10/2007, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Cool.
What threw me off is that the only reference in the source code to
'zeroconf' is a link to http://www.zeroconf.org within the
RendezvousDiscoveryAgent, which appears to all be based on JmDNS?
Yeah, we're usin
using 4.1.1 with client that is consuming messages from a topic using
onMessage for system that passes 400 - 600K messages per day.
Problem - in some but not all clients to the topic, at unpredictable
intervals , we see errors ( below stack trace ) that look like the work of
the "InactivityMonit
Ive edited the activemq.xml file to add the XMPP transport:
http://activemq.org/config/1.0";>
I tried to restart activemq and i get this error:
___-
2007-10-16 14:17:01,904 [erSimpleAppMain] INFO Transp
Hello,
we are facing a strange problem.
I am running an embedded broker in my unit test:
URI activemqConfigurationUri = new
URI("xbean:conf/activemq.xml");
brokerService =
BrokerFactory.createBroker
On 16/10/2007, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Cool.
>
> What threw me off is that the only reference in the source code to
> 'zeroconf' is a link to http://www.zeroconf.org within the
> RendezvousDiscoveryAgent, which appears to all be based on JmDNS?
Yeah, we're using hte JmDNS library for
Cool.
What threw me off is that the only reference in the source code to
'zeroconf' is a link to http://www.zeroconf.org within the
RendezvousDiscoveryAgent, which appears to all be based on JmDNS?
Joe
James.Strachan wrote:
>
> On 16/10/2007, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Try usin
On 16/10/2007, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try using rendezvous or multicast for auto-discovery; I believe AMQ 5.0 no
> longer supports zeroconf.
Actually its still supported AFAIK - I just think Suran tried an old
XML configuration file thats not been ported to the new Spring XML
scheme
Hallo everybody,
everbody I'm using ActiveMQ in JBoss and within ServiveMix-ESB, as you can
see in the picture. Today I got the following Excptions on the ESB-side (I
just replaced IP with host):
Could not accept connection from /host: java.net.SocketException: Socket
closed
java.net.SocketExce
Try using rendezvous or multicast for auto-discovery; I believe AMQ 5.0 no
longer supports zeroconf.
Joe
Suran Jayathilaka wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I've been trying to start activemq with zeroconf. I'm using the latest
> 5.0 SNAPSHOT. I downloaded the source and copied the
> receiver-zeroconf.x
Hey folks,
imagine the following situation:
- One AMQ-Cluster called Cluster_1 consisting of host A1 and A2.
- One AMQ-Cluster called Cluster_2 consisting of host B1 and B2.
Both clusters work on their own shared memory segment.
Now host A1 and A2 from Cluster_1 connect to the hosts from Clust
Hi Fred,
We are experiencing the exact same problem here with ActiveMQ 5.0. We have
had the Iona guys in over the last few weeks and it has been raised as a
bug. I intend to follow up on it in the next few days and will keep you
posted.
Rgds,
Roger
--
View this message in context:
http://www
After some hacking in the sources, I've come up with a version of
FailoverTransport which doesn't hang in oneway() anymore. The "I want to
shutdown *now*" case is not properly handled in this code. Also, I need a
better way to get rid of the reconnectTask when I have to shut down.
One way I've fo
I tried the version you used and the error still occurred unfortunately.
I thought i should mention, the PHP stomp client is being used with SCA for
PHP, im not sure if this changes anything but i forgot to mention it in my
last post.
tabish121 wrote:
>
> What version of ActiveMQ are you usin
13 matches
Mail list logo
