Re: Able to send message to ActiveMQ but Not getting reply to Client

Hi Chago/James, you are right. I had same problem and because of this i am not able to use latest tech. provided by Activemq and jetty(Continuation). I am facing only one issue that is whenever client do polling that time i am not getting any consumer for that client so even if we have data

RE: InactiveIOException Channel was inactive for too long

Please set the inactivity flag on your broker as wireFormat.maxInactivityDuration=-1 http://activemq.apache.org/configuring-wire-formats.html -Original Message- From: tmccauley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2007 9:33 AM To: users@activemq.apache.

Re: Duplicate (persistant) messages with durable subscriptions

I'm experiencing the same or a very similar problem, although it is on version 4.1.1, oddly enough. In my case the broker sends messages to a durable topic with two consumers. They both receive the message just fine. If I then re-start the broker while leaving the clients running, the second cli

Re: Duplicate (persistant) messages with durable subscriptions

I'm experiencing the same or a very similar problem, although it is on version 4.1.1, oddly enough. In my case the broker sends messages to a durable topic with two consumers. They both receive the message just fine. If I then re-start the broker while leaving the clients running, the second cli

Re: Duplicate (persistant) messages with durable subscriptions

I'm experiencing the same or a very similar problem, although it is on version 4.1.1, oddly enough. In my case the broker sends messages to a durable topic with two consumers. They both receive the message just fine. If I then re-start the broker while leaving the clients running, the second cli

Re: Duplicate (persistant) messages with durable subscriptions

I'm experiencing the same or a very similar problem, although it is on version 4.1.1, oddly enough. In my case the broker sends messages to a durable topic with two consumers. They both receive the message just fine. If I then re-start the broker while leaving the clients running, the second cli

InactiveIOException Channel was inactive for too long

I am getting [09:15:54.910] Async exception with no exception listener: org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too long. [09:15:54.910] org.apache.activemq.transport.InactivityIOException: Channel was inactive for too long. on a Listener running under Li

Message Queue get stuck with 2 consumers connected to it

Hi all I'm using network of brokers config with 2 brokers After some time one of the queues on one broker stopped dispatching messages to its 2 consumers, log files contained no errors and any kind of strange behavior, 3 other queues on the same broker were just fine my config file for brokers is

Re: Virtual Topic not working as expected - defect, or misunderstanding?

Hi, James - thanks for the quick reply. I had not started it in persistent mode and I was not statically defining the consumer queue. However, upon doing that the same results apply. I *should* be able to start this broker, send messages to the topic, bring down the broker, bring up the broker,

Re: VM Transport problem when closing connections

No i am not using Spring and YES, I have also tried it without "failover". The result is the same. TOPPER_HARLEY wrote: > > Hi, > Are you using Spring? Can you use an > org.apache.activemq.xbean.BrokerFactoryBean? > > This will create and start the broker and just leave it there in the VM. >

Re: Able to send message to ActiveMQ but Not getting reply to Client

I know others that have had this problem running with the 4.1.x series. Is that the case for you? -- jim JigarP wrote: > > Hi , > >I am using ActiveMQ/AJAX for my web based application. I have > integrated ajax successfully in my application but getting below issue > sometime. > > 1) I s

Re: Daemon process manager

http://www.plope.com/software/supervisor2/ Roger Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We're planning to use ActiveMQ as an asynchronous messaging layer between daemon processes written in various languages (connecting to ActiveMQ via STOMP). We need a convenient way to launch, shutdown, or restart

Re: Not getting all my messages in an Ajax client

Can you upgrade to 5.0? I have tried to help others with the same problem, but it worked for them when they upgraded to latest code. -- jim bbuffone wrote: > > I have started using Active MQ to build an Ajax application and currently > running into problems. When I publish messages from the

Re: Detecting lost ajax clients

Can you provide more detail regarding the problem. I assume you are using the amq.js file? If you are, the browser is constantly polling the server for data. If there is a connection problem, the browser is the first to know about it. In these cases, reconnect logic will have to exist in the brows

NMS bridge

Hi all! I want to connect some Java apps and a nearby MSMQ instance. In the past we put in place a solution using the Level-8 'Geneva Message Queue Connector', which provided a (slightly hairy) Java client. I'd like to put something in place using the amq.net stuff to provide interoperability wi

Re: Virtual Topic not working as expected - defect, or misunderstanding?

On 24/09/2007, dantelope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The following test produces unexpected results: > > 1) Start a broker with a statically defined destination topic called > VirtualTopic.FOO > 2) Start a consumer listening to Consumer.A.VirtualTopic.FOO > 3) Start a sender and send N messages

Re: Is it possible to have a DLQ for each Queue/Topic?

On 25/09/2007, mythz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Is it possible to have a DLQ for each Queue/Topic? rather than all messages > going to ActiveMQ.DLQ? > i.e. getting poison messages for Test.Queue go to DLQ.Test.Queue? Absolutely. Its just a case of specifying the strategy to use... http://acti

Is it possible to have a DLQ for each Queue/Topic?

Is it possible to have a DLQ for each Queue/Topic? rather than all messages going to ActiveMQ.DLQ? i.e. getting poison messages for Test.Queue go to DLQ.Test.Queue? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-have-a-DLQ-for-each-Queue-Topic--tf4514966s2354.html#a1287

Re: How to check if the broker your connected to is still running?

On 23/09/2007, mythz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How can I check that the broker I'm listening on is still running? > > I have a master slave setup where if master broker goes down one of the > slaves takes over. The problem is that the listener does not reconnect to > the new master broker. > >

Re: Daemon process manager

Have you tried using the Java Service Wrapper tool in the binary distro. e.g. go into activemq/bin/linux and see the wrapper scripts; it lets you setup daemons and use unix signals to monitor/start/stop/restart etc On 24/09/2007, Roger Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're planning to use Acti

Re: How to check if the broker your connected to is still running?

mythz wrote: > > How can I check that the broker I'm listening on is still running? > > I have a master slave setup where if master broker goes down one of the > slaves takes over. The problem is that the listener does not reconnect to > the new master broker. > > So how can the listener check

Re: Daemon process manager

Hi, Roger Hoover wrote: > > We need a convenient way to launch, shutdown, or restart the > daemons and supervise them (restart them if they die). We also want to > start multiple copies of daemon process, all listening to the same queue. > > Can anyone recommend any free/open-source tools for