Hi,
I am trying to write a standalone JMS host that can transactionally receive
messages from ActiveMQ using JTA. I have implemented ServerSessionPool and
ServerSession and created a ConnectionConsumer using the JS Connection by
passing the instance os the ServerSessionPool implementation. Howeve
hi,
you need to install the missing jar file manually into you local repository
which is found
under the ${MAVEN_HOME}/confi/settings.xml
download the jar file from the
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.agilejava.docbkx/docbkx-maven-plugin
and run the below command from your command line
m
hi,
you need to install the missing jar file manually into you local repository
which is found
under the ${MAVEN_HOME}/confi/settings.xml
download the jar file from the
http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.agilejava.docbkx/docbkx-maven-plugin
and run the below command from your command line
Hi,
Ho do I configure an XAConnectionFactory in jndi.properties, so that my JMS
client can lookup instances XA connection factories to participate in a
global transaction?
Kind regards
Meeraj
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/XA-Connection-Factory-and-JNDI-tf746s2354.h
Well, seeing as how this message went unanswered for so long, I decided to
crack open the source. Might as well help all those who might have a
similar question in the future.
I'm going to call it a bug. There's a Map in HttpTunnelServlet that maps
clientID's to BlockingQueue transport objects.
Dear ActiveMQ users,
I am new to ActiveMQ. Can anyone tell me why I cannot download ActiveMQ 5.0
Snapshot?
Regards,
Xinjun
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Cannot-download-ActiveMQ-5.0-Snapshot-tf067s2354.html#a12680074
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list a
i'm using a 4.1.1 broker, and cms-2.1.1 clients as consumers/producers,
working with queues, CLIENT_ACK mode.
i noticed some strange behaviour when the consumer is offline while the
producer sends. for testpurpose i have the producer send 300 messages to
some queue. i then start the consumer and
this is a known issue - its been addressed in version 5.0 by ensuring
the vm transport is async by default
cheers,
Rob
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
On Sep 14, 2007, at 9:44 AM, Eduardo Corral wrote:
Hi everyone
We're using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 Broker, embedded in our server, and
while tr
Hi everyone
We're using ActiveMQ 4.1.1 Broker, embedded in our server, and while
trying to stop it, we get a deadlock:
Java stack information for the threads listed above:
===
"ActiveMQ Transport: tcp:///127.0.0.1:64319":
at
org.apache.ac