BrokerService service=BrokerFactory.createBroker(new
URI("xbean:activemq.xml"));
service.setMessageAuthorizationPolicy(new
MyMessageAuthorizationPolicy());
am I worong ??
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/MessageAuthorizationPolicy-does-not
http://activemq.org/config/1.0"/>
Then can not start the ActiveMQ broker
call for help..
thx.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/How-to-configurate-MessageAuthorizationPolicy-in-activemq.xml---tf4302997s2354.html#a12248232
Sent from the ActiveMQ
Hello Active MQ users/developers ,
Our application uses non persistent
embedded broker ,durable subscribers , topic publishers . The active mq
version is 4.1.1(release version). There are two topic publishers and
two durable subscribers respectively.
In your previou
I can set/get both String and Int properties on a TextMessage just fine. I am
using AMQ 4.1.1
Joe
RobBugh wrote:
>
> I can get around the problem if I use a MapMessage instead of a
> TextMessage. Is this correct behavior though? Shouldn't I still be able to
> set/get properties on a TextMessa
Hey,
thx for the hint.
Funny, i always used it like that, but i always thought this would be some
kind of dirty hack and there would be a "clean" way to set up broker
connections...:-)
ttmdev wrote:
>
> transportConnector elements are used by brokers to listen for and accept
> connectio
I can get around the problem if I use a MapMessage instead of a TextMessage.
Is this correct behavior though? Shouldn't I still be able to set/get
properties on a TextMessage?
RobBugh wrote:
>
> I'm having problems retrieving custom properties set on TextMessages. I
> have a persistent queue to
Hello Active MQ users/developers ,
Our application is currently using Actiive MQ
4.1.1 version. We have an embedded broker in Tomcat 5.5 , without
persistence , durable subscribers and Topic publishers , with a time to
live of 5 minutes for the messages. I have observed th
transportConnector elements are used by brokers to listen for and accept
connection requests from clients and other brokers.
Joe
j0llyr0g3r wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> i got a really simple question and i hope someone can help me out.
>
> I simply don't get it: I just want to connect two br
I'm having problems retrieving custom properties set on TextMessages. I have
a persistent queue to pass messages between a simple producer and consumer.
The producer sets several properties on a TextMessage such as,
TextMessage message = m_session.createTextMessage("EMSSyncRequest");
Hi folks,
i got a really simple question and i hope someone can help me out.
I simply don't get it: I just want to connect two brokers, let's call them A
and B.
Ok, so my broker A looks like this:
Simple thing. Listen on 61610 for consumers and
On 8/20/07, ttmdev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bruce,
>
> Are your presentation slides on AMQ publicly available and if so can you
> please direct us to them?
I've attached them for you and I've CC'd you directly because the MLM
will strip the attachment.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30",
Bruce,
Are your presentation slides on AMQ publicly available and if so can you
please direct us to them?
Thanks.
bsnyder wrote:
>
> On 8/17/07, Brian Munroe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 8/15/07, Bruce Snyder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It's all the luck of the draw really. We
James,
I have implemented the plugin that 1) runs on the predefined schedule 2)
cleans all the destinations that are without producers, consumers and
pending messages 3) will start after defined delay so to avoid removing
destinations defined through configuration file.
Would like contribute th
Any responses?
xbranko wrote:
>
> What are the release dates for version 5.0? Even having tentative dates
> (with no obligations or strings attached) would be great.
>
> Thanks,
> Branko
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/What-are-version-5.0-release-dates--tf3984671s
You could just use the web console to remove the queue?
On 8/20/07, bill richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,all
> i m using activeMq recently.And now i need to delete a named queue,which is
> created like this:
> session.createQueue(Name);
> and i want to remove this queue.
> And i have fo
On 8/20/07, bill richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> hi,all
> i m using activeMq recently.And now i need to delete a named queue,which is
> created like this:
> session.createQueue(Name);
> and i want to remove this queue.
> And i have found that this work can be done with jmx.but i have no ide
hi,all
i m using activeMq recently.And now i need to delete a named queue,which is
created like this:
session.createQueue(Name);
and i want to remove this queue.
And i have found that this work can be done with jmx.but i have no idea with
BrokerService and ManagedRegionBroker which are the constr
What would it take to get this in AMQ? Is this something you guys
could do if it were a sponsored task?
On 8/20/07, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we dont actively try and purge messages from storage yet - only when
> they are paged in from store to process (e.g. if there is a consumer
>
New test done ! I have put this code into my first project.
If i try to create a Connection, a Session and a Consumer there is no
problem at all.
But if i create a QueueConnection, a QueueSession and a QueueReceiver i got
the "error".
the QueueConnection is corretly create but the QueueSession not
Hey folks,
i am having a hard time trying to find out how clustering works seamlessly
with amq.
Imagine the following situation:
-> One cluster consisting of a master and a slave broker
-> One consumer and one producer
-> Persistence / Clustering mechanism is filesystem-based via shared storage
Here is my new investigation :
I create a new project!
I only implement one class which implements ServletContextListener and
MessageListener, and wrote this so simple code :
public class ActiveMQBrokerStartListener implements ServletContextListener,
MessageListener {
BrokerService broke
hi:
my activemq.xml
what can i do when i sent a topic message to tcp://192.168.1.156:61616 ,this
message can receive from host2?
the Network Brokers only use in queue?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Network-Brokers-probleam-tf4297571s2354.html#a12232398
denez wrote:
I try your both sample, but it still doesn't work.
I try to move my project directory because originally contains space. but
still have the same error.
I probaly miss something in my configuration or someting is wrong in my
code.
I don't understand.
So, could you give me or send me
Hi folk,
I have used a stomp client with *apache-activemq-4.2-20070607.230602-81. *I
sent and then received messages from a same queue. But when I send with an *
expires *header set of non-zero value, I can't get the message I sent. It
works properly when *expires *is set to 0 or with AMQ version
in our project, we need to provide the power for the server to kick out some
subscribers no matter whether they are still consuming or not..
how to implement this ?
Thanks for reading this message..
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-unsubscribe-a-durable-su
I try your both sample, but it still doesn't work.
I try to move my project directory because originally contains space. but
still have the same error.
I probaly miss something in my configuration or someting is wrong in my
code.
I don't understand.
So, could you give me or send me a sample web ap
26 matches
Mail list logo